Masticatory Performance and Efficiency
R. Manly,Louise C. Braley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345500290040701
1950-08-01
Abstract:IMPLE, reliable methods for measuring masticatory function would be useful aids in evaluating the success of dental restorative procedures. One goal of dental restoration is to improve the masticatory function of patients who have lost teeth. It is surprising how little is known by the dentist concerning his achievement of this goal. Current practices are based on the satisfaction of the patient or the fulfillment of certain theoretical and arbitrary standards that have become accepted because of the clinical experience of their proponents. Tooth structure is replaced wherever it has been destroyed; occlusal surfaces are carved to provide considerable contact with opposing teeth and to approximiate ideal tooth form. The completed restorations are never checked objectively for their masticatory function and there are not even data to prove that the ideal tooth form will provide best function under all conditions. For example, flatter cusps might be advantageous in masticating processed foods, and the ocelusal shape might be modified to compensate for missing teeth. Perhaps contact area should be diminished on teeth which cannot tolerate forces readily, and the normal occlusal pattern might be discarded entirely for denture teeth among cases where forces are severely limited. Several investigations of this topic have appeared in the foreign literature but only a few in English, and there is no agreement concerning the test to be used. The procedures are complicated and vary in the foods and technics that are recommended. Investigators have been unable to agree as to which of several criteria should be used and have been puzzled by the wide variation in performance among persons having the same numbers and types of missing teeth. Most authors agree concerning the principles to be employed in designing a function test for mastication. The test should be selected from foods that are normally consumed. These foods should offer the proper degree of difficulty, permitting a normal dentition to receive a high rating and a deficient dentition, a poor rating. Any selective action that is performed by the normal and is missing from the deficient mouth should be taken into account. A certain degree of precision should be obtained, and the method should be simple, rapid, and inexpensive. Masticatory function tests have been described by Lehman,1 Gaudenz,2 Christiansen,3 Schutz,4 Paulsen,5 Claussen,6 Balters,7 Ascher,8 Gelman,9 Juul,10 Ono,'1 Sognnaes,12 and Dahlberg.13 A variety of test foods were proposed, including Spanish hazel nuts, Brazil nuts, sweet almonds, boiled egg white, potato, apple, carrot, bread, zwiebach, turnip, coconut, meat, cracked corn, and