Privacy Issues, Attacks, Countermeasures and Open Problems in Federated Learning: A Survey

Blessing Guembe,Sanjay Misra,Ambrose Azeta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2024.2410504

IF: 2.777

2024-10-05

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:Aim This study presents a cutting-edge survey on privacy issues, security attacks, countermeasures and open problems in FL.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Achieving Security and Privacy in Federated Learning Systems: Survey, Research Challenges and Future Directions

Alberto Blanco-Justicia,Josep Domingo-Ferrer,Sergio Martínez,David Sánchez,Adrian Flanagan,Kuan Eeik Tan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.06810

2020-12-12

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) allows a server to learn a machine learning (ML) model across multiple decentralized clients that privately store their own training data. In contrast with centralized ML approaches, FL saves computation to the server and does not require the clients to outsource their private data to the server. However, FL is not free of issues. On the one hand, the model updates sent by the clients at each training epoch might leak information on the clients' private data. On the other hand, the model learnt by the server may be subjected to attacks by malicious clients; these security attacks might poison the model or prevent it from converging. In this paper, we first examine security and privacy attacks to FL and critically survey solutions proposed in the literature to mitigate each attack. Afterwards, we discuss the difficulty of simultaneously achieving security and privacy protection. Finally, we sketch ways to tackle this open problem and attain both security and privacy.

Cryptography and Security,Artificial Intelligence
Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

Joshua C. Zhao,Saurabh Bagchi,Salman Avestimehr,Kevin S. Chan,Somali Chaterji,Dimitris Dimitriadis,Jiacheng Li,Ninghui Li,Arash Nourian,Holger R. Roth

2024-05-07

Abstract:Deep learning has shown incredible potential across a vast array of tasks and accompanying this growth has been an insatiable appetite for data. However, a large amount of data needed for enabling deep learning is stored on personal devices and recent concerns on privacy have further highlighted challenges for accessing such data. As a result, federated learning (FL) has emerged as an important privacy-preserving technology enabling collaborative training of machine learning models without the need to send the raw, potentially sensitive, data to a central server. However, the fundamental premise that sending model updates to a server is privacy-preserving only holds if the updates cannot be "reverse engineered" to infer information about the private training data. It has been shown under a wide variety of settings that this premise for privacy does {\em not} hold.

Cryptography and Security,Machine Learning
A Generalized Look at Federated Learning: Survey and Perspectives

Taki Hasan Rafi,Faiza Anan Noor,Tahmid Hussain,Dong-Kyu Chae,Zhaohui Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2303.14787

2023-01-01

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) refers to a distributed machine learning framework involving learning from several decentralized edge clients without sharing local dataset. This distributed strategy prevents data leakage and enables on-device training as it updates the global model based on the local model updates. Despite offering several advantages, including data privacy and scalability, FL poses challenges such as statistical and system heterogeneity of data in federated networks, communication bottlenecks, privacy and security issues. This survey contains a systematic summarization of previous work, studies, and experiments on FL and presents a list of possibilities for FL across a range of applications and use cases. Other than that, various challenges of implementing FL and promising directions revolving around the corresponding challenges are provided.
Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey

Qingdi Han,Siqi Lu,Wenhao Wang,Haipeng Qu,Jingsheng Li,Yang Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8084

2024-03-20

Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience

Abstract:Summary Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by data silos and the need for global data fusion. It offers a distributed machine learning framework with privacy‐preserving features, allowing model training without the need to collect user data. However, FL also presents significant security and privacy threats that hinder its widespread adoption. The requirements of privacy and security in FL are inherently conflicting. Privacy necessitates the concealment of individual client updates, while security requires the disclosure of client updates to detect anomalies. While most existing research focused on the privacy and security aspects of FL, very few studies have addressed the compatibility of these two demands. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a comprehensive defense scheme that ensures privacy, security, and compatibility in FL. We categorize the existing literature into two key directions: privacy defense and security defense. Privacy defense includes methods based on additive masks, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environment, whereas security defense encompasses distance‐, performance‐, clustering‐, and similarity‐based anomaly detection techniques and statistical information‐based anomaly update bypassing techniques when the server is trusted and privacy‐compatible anomaly update detection techniques when the server is not trusted. In addition, this article presents decentralized FL solutions based on blockchain. For each direction, we discuss specific technical solutions, their advantages, and disadvantages. By evaluating various defense methods, we identify the most suitable approach to address the primary challenge of "achieving a secure and robust FL system against malicious adversaries while protecting users' privacy." We then propose a theoretical reference framework for end‐to‐end protection of privacy and security in FL for the key problem, which summarizes the attack surface of FL systems from the client to the server under the security model where the client and server are malicious. Leveraging the strengths and characteristics of existing schemes, our proposed framework integrates multiple techniques to strike a balance between privacy, usability, and efficiency. This framework serves as a valuable reference and provides insights for future work in the field. Finally, we also provide recommendations for future research directions in this field.

computer science, theory & methods, software engineering
A multifaceted survey on privacy preservation of federated learning: progress, challenges, and opportunities

Sanchita Saha,Ashlesha Hota,Arup Kumar Chattopadhyay,Amitava Nag,Sukumar Nandi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10766-7

IF: 9.588

2024-06-23

Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) refers to a system of training and stabilizing local machine learning models at the global level by aggregating the learning gradients of the models. It reduces the concern of sharing the private data of participating entities for statistical analysis to be carried out at the server. It allows participating entities called clients or users to infer useful information from their raw data. As a consequence, the need to share their confidential information with any other entity or the central entity called server is eliminated. FL can be clearly interpreted as a privacy-preserving version of traditional machine learning and deep learning algorithms. However, despite this being an efficient distributed training scheme, the client's sensitive information can still be exposed to various security threats from the shared parameters. Since data has always been a major priority for any user or organization, this article is primarily concerned with discussing the significant problems and issues relevant to the preservation of data privacy and the viability and feasibility of several proposed solutions in the FL context. In this work, we conduct a detailed study on FL, the categorization of FL, the challenges of FL, and various attacks that can be executed to disclose the users' sensitive data used during learning. In this survey, we review and compare different privacy solutions for FL to prevent data leakage and discuss secret sharing (SS)-based security solutions for FL proposed by various researchers in concise form. We also briefly discuss quantum federated learning (QFL) and privacy-preservation techniques in QFL. In addition to these, a comparison and contrast of several survey works on FL is included in this work. We highlight the major applications based on FL. We discuss certain future directions pertaining to the open issues in the field of FL and finally conclude our work.

computer science, artificial intelligence
Federated Learning Attacks and Defenses: A Survey

Yao Chen,Yijie Gui,Hong Lin,Wensheng Gan,Yongdong Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14952

2022-11-27

Cryptography and Security

Abstract:In terms of artificial intelligence, there are several security and privacy deficiencies in the traditional centralized training methods of machine learning models by a server. To address this limitation, federated learning (FL) has been proposed and is known for breaking down ``data silos" and protecting the privacy of users. However, FL has not yet gained popularity in the industry, mainly due to its security, privacy, and high cost of communication. For the purpose of advancing the research in this field, building a robust FL system, and realizing the wide application of FL, this paper sorts out the possible attacks and corresponding defenses of the current FL system systematically. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the basic workflow of FL and related knowledge of attacks and defenses. It reviews a great deal of research about privacy theft and malicious attacks that have been studied in recent years. Most importantly, in view of the current three classification criteria, namely the three stages of machine learning, the three different roles in federated learning, and the CIA (Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability) guidelines on privacy protection, we divide attack approaches into two categories according to the training stage and the prediction stage in machine learning. Furthermore, we also identify the CIA property violated for each attack method and potential attack role. Various defense mechanisms are then analyzed separately from the level of privacy and security. Finally, we summarize the possible challenges in the application of FL from the aspect of attacks and defenses and discuss the future development direction of FL systems. In this way, the designed FL system has the ability to resist different attacks and is more secure and stable.
A Multifaceted Survey on Federated Learning: Fundamentals, Paradigm Shifts, Practical Issues, Recent Developments, Partnerships, Trade-Offs, Trustworthiness, and Ways Forward

Abdul Majeed,Seong Oun Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3413069

IF: 3.9

2024-06-21

IEEE Access

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) is considered a de facto standard for privacy preservation in AI environments because it does not require data to be aggregated in some central place to train an AI model. Preserving data on the client side and sharing only the model's parameters with a central server preserves privacy while training an AI model of higher generalizability. Unfortunately, sharing the model's parameters with the server can create privacy leaks, and therefore, FL is unable to meet privacy requirements in many situations. Furthermore, FL is prone to other technical issues, such as data poisoning, model poisoning, fairness, client dropout, and convergence issues, to name just a few. In this work, we provide a multifaceted survey on FL, including its fundamentals, paradigm shifts, technical issues, recent developments, and future prospects. First, we discuss the fundamental concepts of FL (workflow, categorization, the differences between centralized learning and FL, and applications of FL in diverse fields), and we then discuss the paradigm shifts brought on by FL from a broader perspective (e.g., data use, AI model development, resource sharing, etc.). Later, we pinpoint ten practical issues currently hindering the viability of the FL landscape, and we discuss developments made under each issue by summarizing state-of-the-art (SOTA) literature. We highlight FL partnerships with two or more technologies that either improve practical aspects/issues in FL or extend its adoption to new areas/domains. We pinpoint various trade-offs that exist in an FL ecosystem, and the corresponding SOTA developments to mitigate them. We also discuss the latest studies that have been proposed to make FL trustworthy and beneficial for the community. Lastly, we suggest valuable research directions towards enhancing technical efficacy by guiding researchers to less explored topics in FL.

computer science, information systems,telecommunications,engineering, electrical & electronic
On the Security & Privacy in Federated Learning

Gorka Abad,Stjepan Picek,Víctor Julio Ramírez-Durán,Aitor Urbieta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.05423

2021-12-10

Cryptography and Security

Abstract:Recent privacy awareness initiatives such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation subdued Machine Learning (ML) to privacy and security assessments. Federated Learning (FL) grants a privacy-driven, decentralized training scheme that improves ML models' security. The industry's fast-growing adaptation and security evaluations of FL technology exposed various vulnerabilities that threaten FL's confidentiality, integrity, or availability (CIA). This work assesses the CIA of FL by reviewing the state-of-the-art (SoTA) and creating a threat model that embraces the attack's surface, adversarial actors, capabilities, and goals. We propose the first unifying taxonomy for attacks and defenses and provide promising future research directions.
Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning

Peter Kairouz,H. Brendan McMahan,Brendan Avent,Aurélien Bellet,Mehdi Bennis,Arjun Nitin Bhagoji,Kallista Bonawitz,Zachary Charles,Graham Cormode,Rachel Cummings,Rafael G. L. D’Oliveira,Hubert Eichner,Salim El Rouayheb,David Evans,Josh Gardner,Zachary Garrett,Adrià Gascón,Badih Ghazi,Phillip B. Gibbons,Marco Gruteser,Zaid Harchaoui,Chaoyang He,Lie He,Zhouyuan Huo,Ben Hutchinson,Justin Hsu,Martin Jaggi,Tara Javidi,Gauri Joshi,Mikhail Khodak,Jakub Konecný,Aleksandra Korolova,Farinaz Koushanfar,Sanmi Koyejo,Tancrède Lepoint,Yang Liu,Prateek Mittal,Mehryar Mohri,Richard Nock,Ayfer Özgür,Rasmus Pagh,Hang Qi,Daniel Ramage,Ramesh Raskar,Mariana Raykova,Dawn Song,Weikang Song,Sebastian U. Stich,Ziteng Sun,Ananda Theertha Suresh,Florian Tramèr,Praneeth Vepakomma,Jianyu Wang,Li Xiong,Zheng Xu,Qiang Yang,Felix X. Yu,Han Yu,Sen Zhao,Edited by: Peter Kairouz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083

2021-01-01

Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning setting where many clients (e.g. mobile devices orwhole organizations) collaboratively train a model under the orchestration of a central server (e.g. serviceprovider), while keeping the training data decentralized. FL embodies the principles of focused datacollection and minimization, and can mitigate many of the systemic privacy risks and costs resultingfrom traditional, centralized machine learning and data science approaches. Motivated by the explosivegrowth in FL research, this paper discusses recent advances and presents an extensive collection of openproblems and challenges.<h3>Suggested Citation</h3>Edited by: Peter Kairouz and H. Brendan McMahan (2021), "Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning", Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning: Vol. 14: No. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/2200000083

English Else
Issues in federated learning: some experiments and preliminary results

Jamsher Bhanbhro,Simona Nisticò,Luigi Palopoli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81732-0

IF: 4.6

2024-12-04

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The growing need for data privacy and security in machine learning has led to exploring novel approaches like federated learning (FL) that allow collaborative training on distributed datasets, offering a decentralized alternative to traditional data collection methods. A prime benefit of FL is its emphasis on privacy, enabling data to stay on local devices by moving models instead of data. Despite its pioneering nature, FL faces issues such as diversity in data types, model complexity, privacy concerns, and the need for efficient resource distribution. This paper illustrates an empirical analysis of these challenges within specially designed scenarios, each aimed at studying a specific problem. In particular, differently from existing literature, we isolate the issues that can arise in an FL framework to observe their nature without the interference of external factors.

multidisciplinary sciences
Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Yanli Li,Zhongliang Guo,Nan Yang,Huaming Chen,Dong Yuan,Weiping Ding

2024-07-11

Abstract:Federated Learning (FL) offers innovative solutions for privacy-preserving collaborative machine learning (ML). Despite its promising potential, FL is vulnerable to various attacks due to its distributed nature, affecting the entire life cycle of FL services. These threats can harm the model's utility or compromise participants' privacy, either directly or indirectly. In response, numerous defense frameworks have been proposed, demonstrating effectiveness in specific settings and scenarios. To provide a clear understanding of the current research landscape, this paper reviews the most representative and state-of-the-art threats and defense frameworks throughout the FL service life cycle. We start by identifying FL threats that harm utility and privacy, including those with potential or direct impacts. Then, we dive into the defense frameworks, analyze the relationship between threats and defenses, and compare the trade-offs among different defense strategies. Finally, we summarize current research bottlenecks and offer insights into future research directions to conclude this survey. We hope this survey sheds light on trustworthy FL research and contributes to the FL community.

Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing,Artificial Intelligence
Challenges and future directions of secure federated learning: a survey

Kaiyue Zhang,Xuan Song,Chenhan Zhang,Shui Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-021-0598-z

Abstract:Federated learning came into being with the increasing concern of privacy security, as people's sensitive information is being exposed under the era of big data. It is an algorithm that does not collect users' raw data, but aggregates model parameters from each client and therefore protects user's privacy. Nonetheless, due to the inherent distributed nature of federated learning, it is more vulnerable under attacks since users may upload malicious data to break down the federated learning server. In addition, some recent studies have shown that attackers can recover information merely from parameters. Hence, there is still lots of room to improve the current federated learning frameworks. In this survey, we give a brief review of the state-of-the-art federated learning techniques and detailedly discuss the improvement of federated learning. Several open issues and existing solutions in federated learning are discussed. We also point out the future research directions of federated learning. Electronic supplementary material: Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at 10.1007/s11704-021-0598-z.
Threats to Federated Learning: A Survey

Lingjuan Lyu,Han Yu,Qiang Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.02133

2020-03-04

Cryptography and Security

Abstract:With the emergence of data silos and popular privacy awareness, the traditional centralized approach of training artificial intelligence (AI) models is facing strong challenges. Federated learning (FL) has recently emerged as a promising solution under this new reality. Existing FL protocol design has been shown to exhibit vulnerabilities which can be exploited by adversaries both within and without the system to compromise data privacy. It is thus of paramount importance to make FL system designers to be aware of the implications of future FL algorithm design on privacy-preservation. Currently, there is no survey on this topic. In this paper, we bridge this important gap in FL literature. By providing a concise introduction to the concept of FL, and a unique taxonomy covering threat models and two major attacks on FL: 1) poisoning attacks and 2) inference attacks, this paper provides an accessible review of this important topic. We highlight the intuitions, key techniques as well as fundamental assumptions adopted by various attacks, and discuss promising future research directions towards more robust privacy preservation in FL.
Security and Privacy Issues of Federated Learning

Jahid Hasan

2023-07-23

Abstract:Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising approach to address data privacy and confidentiality concerns by allowing multiple participants to construct a shared model without centralizing sensitive data. However, this decentralized paradigm introduces new security challenges, necessitating a comprehensive identification and classification of potential risks to ensure FL's security guarantees. This paper presents a comprehensive taxonomy of security and privacy challenges in Federated Learning (FL) across various machine learning models, including large language models. We specifically categorize attacks performed by the aggregator and participants, focusing on poisoning attacks, backdoor attacks, membership inference attacks, generative adversarial network (GAN) based attacks, and differential privacy attacks. Additionally, we propose new directions for future research, seeking innovative solutions to fortify FL systems against emerging security risks and uphold sensitive data confidentiality in distributed learning environments.

Cryptography and Security,Artificial Intelligence
Advancements in Federated Learning: Models, Methods, and Privacy

Huiming Chen,Huandong Wang,Qingyue Long,Depeng Jin,Yong Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11466

IF: 14.4

2023-02-22

Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) is a promising technique for addressing the rising privacy and security issues. Its main ingredient is to cooperatively learn the model among the distributed clients without uploading any sensitive data. In this paper, we conducted a thorough review of the related works, following the development context and deeply mining the key technologies behind FL from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Specifically, we first classify the existing works in FL architecture based on the network topology of FL systems with detailed analysis and summarization. Next, we abstract the current application problems, summarize the general techniques and frame the application problems into the general paradigm of FL base models. Moreover, we provide our proposed solutions for model training via FL. We have summarized and analyzed the existing FedOpt algorithms, and deeply revealed the algorithmic development principles of many first-order algorithms in depth, proposing a more generalized algorithm design framework. Based on these frameworks, we have instantiated FedOpt algorithms. As privacy and security is the fundamental requirement in FL, we provide the existing attack scenarios and the defense methods. To the best of our knowledge, we are among the first tier to review the theoretical methodology and propose our strategies since there are very few works surveying the theoretical approaches. Our survey targets motivating the development of high-performance, privacy-preserving, and secure methods to integrate FL into real-world applications.
Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challenges

Nuria Rodríguez-Barroso,Daniel Jiménez López,M. Victoria Luzón,Francisco Herrera,Eugenio Martínez-Cámara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.011

2022-01-20

Abstract:Federated learning is a machine learning paradigm that emerges as a solution to the privacy-preservation demands in artificial intelligence. As machine learning, federated learning is threatened by adversarial attacks against the integrity of the learning model and the privacy of data via a distributed approach to tackle local and global learning. This weak point is exacerbated by the inaccessibility of data in federated learning, which makes harder the protection against adversarial attacks and evidences the need to furtherance the research on defence methods to make federated learning a real solution for safeguarding data privacy. In this paper, we present an extensive review of the threats of federated learning, as well as as their corresponding countermeasures, attacks versus defences. This survey provides a taxonomy of adversarial attacks and a taxonomy of defence methods that depict a general picture of this vulnerability of federated learning and how to overcome it. Likewise, we expound guidelines for selecting the most adequate defence method according to the category of the adversarial attack. Besides, we carry out an extensive experimental study from which we draw further conclusions about the behaviour of attacks and defences and the guidelines for selecting the most adequate defence method according to the category of the adversarial attack. This study is finished leading to meditated learned lessons and challenges.

Cryptography and Security,Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning
Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses

Lingjuan Lyu,Han Yu,Xingjun Ma,Chen Chen,Lichao Sun,Jun Zhao,Qiang Yang,Philip S. Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2022.3216981

IF: 14.255

2022-01-01

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract:As data are increasingly being stored in different silos and societies becoming more aware of data privacy issues, the traditional centralized training of artificial intelligence (AI) models is facing efficiency and privacy challenges. Recently, federated learning (FL) has emerged as an alternative solution and continues to thrive in this new reality. Existing FL protocol designs have been shown to be vulnerable to adversaries within or outside of the system, compromising data privacy and system robustness. Besides training powerful global models, it is of paramount importance to design FL systems that have privacy guarantees and are resistant to different types of adversaries. In this article, we conduct a comprehensive survey on privacy and robustness in FL over the past five years. Through a concise introduction to the concept of FL and a unique taxonomy covering: 1) threat models; 2) privacy attacks and defenses; and 3) poisoning attacks and defenses, we provide an accessible review of this important topic. We highlight the intuitions, key techniques, and fundamental assumptions adopted by various attacks and defenses. Finally, we discuss promising future research directions toward robust and privacy-preserving FL, and their interplays with the multidisciplinary goals of FL.

computer science, artificial intelligence, theory & methods,engineering, electrical & electronic, hardware & architecture
Security and Privacy Threats to Federated Learning: Issues, Methods, and Challenges

Junpeng Zhang,Hui Zhu,Fengwei Wang,Jiaqi Zhao,Qi Xu,Hui Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2886795

IF: 1.968

2022-09-30

Security and Communication Networks

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) has nourished a promising method for data silos, which enables multiple participants to construct a joint model collaboratively without centralizing data. The security and privacy considerations of FL are focused on ensuring the robustness of the global model and the privacy of participants' information. However, the FL paradigm is under various security threats from the adversary aggregator and participants. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively identify and classify potential threats to provide a theoretical basis for FL with security guarantees. In this paper, a unique classification of attacks, which reviews state-of-the-art research on security and privacy issues for FL, is constructed from the perspective of malicious threats based on different computing parties. Specifically, we categorize attacks with respect to performed by aggregator and participant, highlighting the Deep Gradients Leakage attacks and Generative Adversarial Networks attacks. Following an overview of attack methods, we discuss the primary mitigation techniques against security risks and privacy breaches, especially the application of blockchain and Trusted Execution Environments. Finally, several promising directions for future research are discussed.

computer science, information systems,telecommunications
Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives

Linlin Wang,Tianqing Zhu,Wanlei Zhou,Philip S. Yu

2024-06-16

Abstract:Federated learning is fast becoming a popular paradigm for applications involving mobile devices, banking systems, healthcare, and IoT systems. Hence, over the past five years, researchers have undertaken extensive studies on the privacy leaks, security threats, and fairness associated with these emerging models. For the most part, these three critical concepts have been studied in isolation; however, recent research has revealed that there may be an intricate interplay between them. For instance, some researchers have discovered that pursuing fairness may compromise privacy, or that efforts to enhance security can impact fairness. These emerging insights shed light on the fundamental connections between privacy, security, and fairness within federated learning, and, by delving deeper into these interconnections, we may be able to significantly augment research and development across the field. Consequently, the aim of this survey is to offer comprehensive descriptions of the privacy, security, and fairness issues in federated learning. Moreover, we analyze the complex relationships between these three dimensions of cyber safety and pinpoint the fundamental elements that influence each of them. We contend that there exists a trade-off between privacy and fairness and between security and gradient sharing. On this basis, fairness can function as a bridge between privacy and security to build models that are either more secure or more private. Building upon our observations, we identify the trade-offs between privacy and fairness and between security and fairness within the context of federated learning. The survey then concludes with promising directions for future research in this vanguard field.

Machine Learning,Cryptography and Security,Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Privacy Issues, Attacks, Countermeasures and Open Problems in Federated Learning: A Survey

Achieving Security and Privacy in Federated Learning Systems: Survey, Research Challenges and Future Directions

Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

A Generalized Look at Federated Learning: Survey and Perspectives

Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey

A multifaceted survey on privacy preservation of federated learning: progress, challenges, and opportunities

Federated Learning Attacks and Defenses: A Survey

A Multifaceted Survey on Federated Learning: Fundamentals, Paradigm Shifts, Practical Issues, Recent Developments, Partnerships, Trade-Offs, Trustworthiness, and Ways Forward

On the Security & Privacy in Federated Learning

Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning

Issues in federated learning: some experiments and preliminary results

Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Challenges and future directions of secure federated learning: a survey

Threats to Federated Learning: A Survey

Security and Privacy Issues of Federated Learning

Advancements in Federated Learning: Models, Methods, and Privacy

Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challenges

Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses

Security and Privacy Threats to Federated Learning: Issues, Methods, and Challenges

Linkage on Security, Privacy and Fairness in Federated Learning: New Balances and New Perspectives