Impact of aging on the fracture strength of 3D‐printed fixed implant prostheses: A comparative analysis of monolithic and bi‐layer with or without fiber‐reinforced composite frameworks

Renata Moreira Cançado,Adilson Sakuno,Franciele Floriani,Amirali Zandinejad,Cintia Helena Coury Saraceni,Elcio Magdalena Giovani,Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13988
2024-11-30
Journal of Prosthodontics
Abstract:Purpose This study aims to evaluate the fracture strength of three‐unit, implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) constructed from 3D‐printed resin. It compares structures with and without fiber‐reinforced composite (FRC) frameworks under conditions that mimic artificial aging. Materials and Methods Forty FDPs were fabricated and divided into two groups: monolithic (n = 20) and bi‐layer (n = 20). The monolithic group (MG) consisted entirely of FDPs made from 3D‐printed resin for permanent restorations, while the bi‐layer group (BG) featured FDPs with an FRC framework veneered with the same 3D‐printed resin. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups: one subjected to artificial aging (MTG, n = 10; BTG, n = 10), and the other served as the baseline control (n = 10). All subgroups underwent a mechanical bending test, applying a single load to failure using a universal testing machine. Results There was a statistically significant difference in fracture strength due to the presence of the FRC framework (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?