The Impact of Tele-Stewardship on Rural Antibiotic Prescribing Practices

Matthew Peworchik,Ritu Banerjee,Sophie E Katz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piae093.050

2024-11-04

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society

Abstract:BackgroundAntibiotic prescribing for children is highest in rural areas. Tele-stewardship allows for implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AS) via telecommunication with providers. There has been limited research on the effectiveness of tele-stewardship in the outpatient setting. In this study, we address the need for better AS in rural areas by developing, implementing, and evaluating AS interventions using tele-stewardship.MethodsWe employed bundled outpatient AS implementation strategies in rural pediatric primary care (PC) clinics and emergency departments (EDs) affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) using tele-stewardship. The bundle includes (1) patient/guardian educational materials, (2) antibiotic use commitment posters (3) provider education through quarterly teaching pearls on common pediatric infections, communication skills training (DART modules), app-based microlearning modules (QuizTime), and implicit/explicit bias education and (4) quarterly audit and feedback with peer comparison on guideline-concordant antibiotic use. Participants are pediatric prescribers (physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner). We compared antibiotic prescription data for children <18 years collected during the "baseline" period (Jan-Dec 2022) to the intervention period (Jan-Sept 2023). Two academic urban primary care clinics and one academic urban ED at which the interventions were not implemented were included as "control" sites. The primary outcome is percent of all encounters that result in an antibiotic prescription. Pre- and post-intervention data were analyzed in aggregate (not at the provider-level). Significance was determined via calculating a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference of proportions.ResultsTo date, there have been 140,077 PC patient encounters (98,409 baseline and 41,065 intervention) and 94,205 ED encounters (61759 baseline and 32,446 intervention) across all sites. Change from baseline to intervention periods in academic PC sites was 0.9 percentage points (95% CI 0.556 to 1.243; 6.6% baseline, 7.5% intervention) while change in rural intervention sites was -1.05 percentage points (95% CI -0.409 to -1.667; 11.8% baseline, 10.75% intervention; Figure 1a ). Only 1 of 3 rural EDs had a decrease in percent of encounters with an antibiotic prescription ( Figure 1b ). Overall the academic ED showed a 3.1 percentage point increase (95% CI 2.430 to 3.769; 18.0% baseline, 21.1% intervention) while the rural sites showed a 1.0 percentage point increase (95% CI -0.817 to 2.817; 24.2% baseline, 25.2% intervention).ConclusionInterim analysis shows that bundled implementation strategies using tele-AS led to significantly decreased overall antibiotic use in rural primary care clinics compared to urban academic control sites. The study is ongoing and will continue to evaluate outcomes over a longer intervention period to reduce seasonal bias.

pediatrics,infectious diseases