Abstract:Objective: In many high-income countries, approximately half of all births are now planned regarding timing, either by elective Caesarean Section (CS) or induction of labour (IOL). To what degree this is explained by women's birth beliefs and preferences, and in turn, factors such as parity and ethnicity that may influence them, is contentious. Within a broader study on Timing of Birth by planned CS or IOL, we aimed to explore the association between demographic and pregnancy factors, with women's birth beliefs and experiences of planned birth decision-making in late pregnancy. Design: Survey study of women's birth beliefs and experiences of planned birth decision-making. Both univariate analysis and ordinal regression modelling was performed to examine the influence of; parity; cultural background; continuity of pregnancy care; CS or IOL; and whether CS was "recommended" or "requested", on women's stated birth beliefs and decision-making experience. Setting: 8 Sydney hospitals PARTICIPANTS: Women planned to have an IOL or CS between November 2018-July 2019. Measurement: The survey included four statements regarding birth beliefs and ten statements about experiences of decision-making on a 5-item Likert scale, as well as questions about demographic and pregnancy factors that might influence these beliefs. Findings: Of 340 included surveys, 56% regarded IOL and 44% CS. Women indicated strong belief both that they should be supported to make decisions about their birth and that their doctor/midwife knows what is best for them (over 90% agreement for both). Regarding decision-making, over 90% also agreed they had trust in the person providing information, understood it, and had sufficient time for both questions and decision-making. However only 58% were provided written information, 19% felt they "didn't really have a choice", and 9% felt pressure to make a decision. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, women having CS (versus IOL) expressed more positive views of their experience and involvement in decision-making, as did women experiencing a pregnancy continuity-of-care model. Women identifying as from a specific cultural or ethnic background expressed more negative experiences. On modelling, the studied factors accounted for only a small proportion of the variation in responses (3-19%). Conclusions: Continuity of pregnancy care was associated with positive decision-making experiences and cultural background with more negative experiences. Women whose planned birth was IOL versus CS also reported more negative decision-making experiences. Implications for practice: Attention to improving quality of information provision, including written information, to women having IOL and women of diverse background, is recommended to improve women's experiences of planned birth decision-making.

Women's reflections on induction of labour and birthing interventions and what they would do differently next time: a content analysis

Preferences for induction of labor methods in India: a qualitative study of views and experiences of women, clinicians, and researchers

Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study

Women's expectations about birth, requests for pain relief in labor and the subsequent development of birth dissonance and trauma

Role of mode of induction and delivery and women's satisfaction after induction of labour at term: An observational study

Motivations for and experience with labor induction at 39 weeks in women with obesity—A qualitative study

Induction of labor and cesarean birth in lower‐risk nulliparous women at term: A retrospective cohort study

Neonatal and maternal outcomes at early vs. full term following induction of labor; A secondary analysis of the OBLIGE randomized trial

Implementation and Clinical Impact of a Guideline for Standardized, Evidence-Based Induction of Labor

Induction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units

"We hear and we fear" - Insights of 1203 Women on Personnel Conversations During Cesarean Delivery

Women's experiences of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in labour: A qualitative study

The First Baby Study: What women would like to have known about first childbirth. A mixed‐methods study

Evidence Based Management of Labor

Obstetric interventions' effects on the birthing experience

Women's experiences of changes to childbirth and parenting education in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: The birth in the time of COVID-19 (BITTOC) study

Antenatal education incorporating complementary medicine techniques for labour and birth to reduce the rates of epidural in primiparous women: A randomised control trial

First-time mothers' expectations of the unknown territory of childbirth: Uncertainties, coping strategies and 'going with the flow'

Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population‐based, historical cohort study

Preference for cesarean section in young nulligravid women in eight OECD countries and implications for reproductive health education

Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor