Characterization of sixteen endometrial cancer cell lines

Xun Zhou,K. Podratz,Shi-Wen Jiang,Zhaoyu Wang,Ying-Ling Zhao
2007-05-01
Abstract:3870 Objectives: This study aimed to examine in vitro and in vivo properties of sixteen endometrial cancer cell lines, including cell proliferation, morphology, hormone receptor expression, PTEN, hMLH1 expression, p53 mutation, karyotype and tumorigenicity. Methods: Twelve type I endometrial cancer cell lines (AN3, ECC-1, EN, EN-1, EN-11, HEC-1A, HEC-1B, Ishikawa, KLE, MFE-280, MFE-296, MFE-319) and four type II endometrial cancer cell lines (ARK1, ARK2, HEC-155/180, SPEC-2) were studied. Cell proliferation and morphology were assayed using cell growth curves and light microscopy. Molecular profiling was assessed with real-time PCR, methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), denaturing high-frequency liquid chromatography (DHPLC)-directed mutational analysis and conventional karyotyping. Tumorigenicity was evaluated using the mouse xenograft model. Results: The population doubling time of the cell lines ranged between 19-41 hours, and did not differ significantly between type I and II cell lines. Estrogen receptor (ER-α and ER-β) expression profiling showed that Ishikawa, ECC-1 and MFE-280 have high ER expression for both isoforms. Progesterone receptor (PR-B) expression is uniformly decreased in type II cell lines, but only decreased in selective type I cell lines (AN3, HEC-1A, HEC-1B, KLE, EN-1). PR-B methylation was detected in only one type II cell line (ARK1). PTEN expression was more uniformly suppressed in type II than type I cells, while hMLH1 did not show this pattern. P53 mutational analysis revealed at least one mutation in exons 5-8 in nine of the sixteen cell lines (56%). Multiple karyotypic abnormalities were detected in the cell lines, and aided to confirm the independent clonalities of these cell lines. Mouse xenograft identified cell lines with potent tumorigenic activities: ARK1, ARK2, HEC-1A, HEC-1B and EN-1. Conclusions: Type II compared to type I endometrial cancer cell lines uniformly exhibit more suppression of PR-B and PTEN expression. Promoter methylation accounts for PR-B silencing in type II much less frequently than in type I cell lines. In addition, this study also provides valuable information about endometrial cancer cell lines commonly used in the laboratory. The investigator can choose the cell lines with the desired characteristics for a specific study based on the above data.
Biology,Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?