Abstract:Purpose - In forecasting unknown quantities, risk and finance decision makers often rely on one or more biased experts, statistical specialists representing parties with an interest in the decision maker's final forecast. This problem arises in a variety of contexts, and the decision maker may represent a corporate enterprise, rating agency, government regulator, etc. The purpose of the paper is to assist decision makers, experts, and others to have a better understanding of the dynamics of the problem, and to adopt strategies and practices that enhance efficiency.Design/methodology/approach - The problem is formulated as a two-person, non-cooperative Bayesian game with the decision maker and one expert as players, and perfect Bayesian equilibrium solutions are identified. Then the analysis is extended to variations of the game in which the expert's loss function is not common knowledge, and in which there are multiple experts.Findings - In the struggle for information between the decision maker and the experts, the experts generally benefit from greater uncertainty about the parameters of the model. Thus, in attempting to elicit as much information as possible from the experts, the decision maker must strive to minimize all sources of uncertainty.Research limitations/implications - As in most Bayesian games, the analysis requires that a variety of process assumptions and model parameters be common knowledge. These conditions may be difficult to satisfy in real-world applications.Practical implications - The principal finding of the study is that there is truly a struggle for information between the decision maker and the experts. This generally encourages the experts to inject as much uncertainty as possible into the process. To counter this effect, the decision maker might: provide incentives for the experts to increase their sampling information; try to mitigate specific uncertainties regarding the model parameters; and try to increase the number of experts.Originality/value - This is the first paper to apply the framework of signaling games to the problem of eliciting information from biased experts. It is of value to decision makers, experts, and economic researchers.

Information encryption in the expert management of strategic uncertainty

Synergistic Information Processing Encrypts Strategic Reasoning in Poker

Models of Strategic Decision-Making under Informational Control

Is Knowledge Power? On the (Im)possibility of Learning from Strategic Interactions

Making Money from What You Know - How to Sell Information?

Games Under Network Uncertainty

Bayesian Persuasion With Complementary Information

Asymmetric Battlefield Uncertainty in General Lotto Games

Explaining Predictive Uncertainty with Information Theoretic Shapley Values

Information Aggregation Under Ambiguity: Theory and Experimental Evidence

Strategic Ambiguity in Global Games

Forecasts From Biased Experts: A "Meta-Credibility" Problem

Strategy Under Uncertainty: International Conflict and Variation in Information

Partial Information: Equivalent to Complete Information

Cryptographically Blinded Games: Leveraging Players' Limitations for Equilibria and Profit

Asymmetry of Risk and Value of Information

Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic Sophistication

Gambling under unknown probabilities as a proxy for real world decisions under uncertainty

An Adversarial Interpretation of Information-Theoretic Bounded Rationality

False Consensus, Information Theory, and Prediction Markets

Playing it safe: information constrains collective betting strategies