Abstract:Abstract Background Endoscopic resection is the standard of care for the management of colorectal polyps. Larger and more complex polyps require endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). While complications have been low, EMR is often piecemeal, resulting in indeterminant margins and often a higher recurrence rate. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic resection technique with a higher rate of en bloc resection. While more data exist for the resection of gastric lesions with ESD, ESD is becoming more widely used in western countries for the resection of colorectal lesions. Purpose The purpose of this study is to report on the outcomes and rates of complications for colorectal ESD completed in a tertiary centre in British Columbia. Method All colorectal ESD was completed by a senior therapeutic endoscopist who has previously received training in Japan. Retrospective data were collected on all colorectal ESD procedures done in St. Paul’s Hospital from July 11th, 2016, when the procedure first became available, to Aug 30th, 2022. Inclusion criteria were all adults who have undergone ESD for resection of a colorectal lesion. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18. Data collected included demographic variables, polyp characteristics, procedural outcomes, and complications. Result(s) A total of 39 ESD procedures were completed. The mean size of the resected lesion was 30.4 mm (range: 5 – 60 mm). Technical success, defined as successful resection of all polypoid tissue, was achieved in 35/39 procedures (89.7%). En-bloc resection was achieved in 27/35 (77.1%) of the completed ESD. The rate of R0 resection was 22/35 (62.9%). Curative resection, defined as technically successful ESD with R0 margin and no lymphovascular invasion, was achieved in 23/39 (59.0%) of the cases and the majority of the patients with non-curative resection that underwent endoscopic surveillance had no recurrence on follow-up. In our cohort, 3/39 (7.7%) patients had adenocarcinoma. None of the ESD resulted in any intra-procedural or delayed perforation. 3/39 (7.7%) patients had clinically significant post-endoscopic resection bleeding. Out of 24 patients that completed follow-up, 4 (16.7%) had recurrence at the resection site that was managed endoscopically. 4/39 (10.3%) of patients required surgery post-ESD. Conclusion(s) In our cohort, ESD is an effective endoscopic resection modality for the management of colorectal adenomas and early adenocarcinoma with a high rate of technical success and low rates of complications. Although the rate of curative resection was low, most were the result of R1 or Rx resection and a majority of the follow-ups in this subgroup demonstrated no further recurrence. The rate of en bloc resection is high, especially given the average size of adenomas in this cohort. Although ESD requires high technical proficiency, its favorable outcomes and low complication rates make ESD highly feasible for the resection of colorectal lesions. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Recurrences of advanced sessile and lateral spreading colorectal adenoma after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) thermal ablation versus no adjuvant therapy (RESPECT): a protocol of an international randomized controlled trial

Mesenteric excision surgery or conservative limited resection in Crohn’s disease: study protocol for an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial

Standardised training for endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps to reduce recurrence (*STAR-LNPCP study): a multicentre cluster randomised trial

Endoscopic Mucosal Resectionvsendoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Carcinoid Tumours: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cold versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps (Randomized-controlled German CHRONICLE-trial)

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas

Long-term outcomes for Advanced Colorectal Polyps in the BowelScreen Programme

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial

Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection: the different endoscopic techniques for colorectal tumors

Impact of margin thermal ablation after endoscopic mucosal resection of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colonic polyps on long-term recurrence

Rates of Recurrent Intestinal Metaplasia and Dysplasia After Successful Endoscopic Therapy of Barrett's Neoplasia by EMR vs ESD and Ablation: A Large North American Multicenter Cohort

Immediate Results of Colonic Flat Epithelial Neoplasms Removal Using Diathermic Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Mucosectomy Combined with Dissection in the Submucosal Layer: Comparative Assessment

A131 ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF COLORECTAL ADENOMAS AND EARLY ADENOCARCINOMAS: OUTCOMES FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors: a Meta-Analysis.

Effectiveness of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 to 20 Mm Colorectal Polyps

A30 RECURRENCE RATES AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection for large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments

Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis