Abstract:CONSPECTUS: All-atom methods treat solute and solvent at the same level of electronic structure theory and statistical mechanics. All-atom computation of acidity constants (pKa) and redox potentials is still a challenge. In this Account, we review such a method combining density functional theory based molecular dynamics (DFTMD) and free energy perturbation (FEP) methods. The key computational tool is a FEP based method for reversible insertion of a proton or electron in a periodic DFTMD model system. The free energy of insertion (work function) is computed by thermodynamic integration of vertical energy gaps obtained from total energy differences. The problem of the loss of a physical reference for ionization energies under periodic boundary conditions is solved by comparing with the proton work function computed for the same supercell. The scheme acts as a computational hydrogen electrode, and the DFTMD redox energies can be directly compared with experimental redox potentials. Consistent with the closed shell nature of acid dissociation, pKa estimates computed using the proton insertion/removal scheme are found to be significantly more accurate than the redox potential calculations. This enables us to separate the DFT error from other sources of uncertainty such as finite system size and sampling errors. Drawing an analogy with charged defects in solids, we trace the error in redox potentials back to underestimation of the energy gap of the extended states of the solvent. Accordingly the improvement in the redox potential as calculated by hybrid functionals is explained as a consequence of the opening up of the bandgap by the Hartree-Fock exchange component in hybrids. Test calculations for a number of small inorganic and organic molecules show that the hybrid functional implementation of our method can reproduce acidity constants with an uncertainty of 1-2 pKa units (0.1 eV). The error for redox potentials is in the order of 0.2 V.

π‐Conjugation as a Direct Estimate of Lewis Acidity

What Distinguishes the Strength and the Effect of a Lewis Acid: Analysis of the Gutmann–Beckett Method

Functional Assessment of the Lewis Acid Strength of Structurally Complex Solid Acids

How to Deal with Charge in the Ranking of Lewis Acidity: Critical Evaluation of an Extensive Set of Cationic Lewis Acids

Predicting Lewis Acidity: Machine‐Learning the Fluoride Ion Affinity of p‐Block‐Atom‐based Molecules

Are Strong Bronsted Acids Necessarily Strong Lewis Acids?

Single-Center, but Multipotent Lewis acids: Illuminating the Multiple Lewis Acidity of Triaryl-Boranes via Atropisomeric Dative Adducts

Quantification and Application of Lewis Acidity and Basicity of Benzene and Its Derivates

An Approach to the Estimation of Solute Hydrogen-Bond Donor Acidity

ChemInform Abstract: Redox Potentials and Acidity Constants from Density Functional Theory Based Molecular Dynamics

In silico calculation of acidity constants of carbonic acid conformers.

Illuminating the Multiple Lewis Acidity of Triaryl-Boranes via Atropisomeric Dative Adducts

Theoretical Quantification of the Lewis Acidity of N‐Heterocyclic iodonium salts

A Benchmark Study of DFT‐Computed p‐Block Element Lewis Pair Formation Enthalpies against Experimental Calorimetric Data

Redox potentials and acidity constants from density functional theory based molecular dynamics.

Quantification of the Activation Capabilities of Lewis/Brønsted Acid for Electrophilic Trifluoromethylthiolating Reagents†

Role of Non‐Covalent Interactions on Acid Strength Measurement of Liquid Acids using Phosphine Oxide NMR Probe

Structure-Constraint Induced Increase in Lewis Acidity of Tris(ortho-carboranyl)borane and Selective Complexation with Bestmann Ylides

The Ether‐Adduct of a Lewis Superacidic, Dicoordinate Aluminum Hydride Cation and the Ion Affinities of Solvent‐Adducts

Standard pK(a) scales of carbon-centered indicator acids in ionic liquids: effect of media and structural implication.

Theoretical Study of Lewis Acid Activation Models for Hypervalent Fluoroiodane Reagent: the Generality of “F-Coordination” Activation Model