What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve revolve around the definition, application, and ethical controversies of continuous palliative sedation in hospice care. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Describe the experiences of clinicians using continuous sedation in different palliative care settings**: By understanding the actual operations of clinicians, it reveals how they make decisions and implement sedation measures when faced with patients' severe and difficult - to - control symptoms. 2. **Explore the impact of the legalization of euthanasia on palliative sedation practice**: Analyze how the legalization of euthanasia has changed clinicians' attitudes and practices regarding continuous sedation, especially in terms of patients' and families' awareness and needs for these two options. ### Background and the Importance of the Problem Continuous palliative sedation is a method used in the terminal stage to relieve patients' unbearable symptoms (such as delirium, pain, dyspnea, etc.), which is achieved by reducing the patient's level of consciousness until death. However, this practice has extensive medical and ethical controversies, resulting in a lack of consistency in its definition and indications in the literature. Moreover, existing guidelines are not always applicable to actual clinical practice, especially in the home - care environment. ### Research Methods To better understand these problems, the researchers adopted a qualitative research method and collected data through discussions in six focus groups, which included 28 palliative care clinicians (15 nurses, 12 doctors, and 1 name - end - of - life counselor) from across Canada. Through Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), the researchers sorted out six key themes, covering multiple aspects from dealing with patients' pain to handling uncertainties. ### Main Findings The research results show that continuous palliative sedation is not only a means to relieve patients' pain but also involves the emotional support of family members and the cooperation of multidisciplinary teams. The main challenges faced by clinicians in practice include: - **Coping with Uncertainty**: Accurately predicting the patient's prognostic time (usually within two weeks) is a key factor in deciding whether to perform continuous sedation, but this prediction is often uncertain. - **Ethical Dilemmas**: Clinicians need to find a balance between relieving patients' pain and avoiding accelerating death and deal with value conflicts from patients, families, and within the team. - **Adapting to Changing Needs**: Clinicians must flexibly adjust the sedation plan according to specific situations to ensure high - quality care, especially during the epidemic, when family members cannot participate in the decision - making process due to visitation restrictions. ### Conclusions Despite many challenges, clinicians show strong reflective and adaptive abilities and can adjust sedation measures according to the actual situation to provide better hospice care. At the same time, the study emphasizes the importance of clearly defining and standardizing continuous palliative sedation to ensure its safe and effective application. ### Key Formulas (None) This research mainly involves qualitative analysis and does not involve specific mathematical, physical, or chemical formulas.

Continuous palliative sedation until death: a qualitative study of palliative care clinicians' experiences

Controversies surrounding continuous deep sedation at the end of life: the parliamentary and societal debates in France

Palliative sedation – revised recommendations

Continuous Deep Sedation Until Death of Children at the End of Life: French Physicians' Opinions

Sedation practices in palliative care services across France: a nationwide point-prevalence analysis

Tension between continuous and deep sedation and assistance in dying: a national survey of intensive care professionals' perceptions

Terminological Confusion About Sedation in Palliative Care: Results of an International Online Vignette Survey

Continuous palliative sedation in terminally ill patients with cancer: a retrospective observational cohort study from a Chinese palliative care unit

Revised European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework on palliative sedation: An international Delphi study

Intentional Sedation as a Means to Ease Suffering: A Systematically Constructed Terminology for Sedation in Palliative Care

Report on palliative sedation medication usage: a survey of palliative care experts in Eight European countries

The Attitudes and Experiences of Hospice Nurses Regarding Palliative Sedation: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

Expanding the Use of Continuous Sedation Until Death and Physician-Assisted Suicide

Cross-cultural comparison of continuous deep sedation for advanced cancer patients in East Asian countries: prospective cohort study

The Decision-Making Process for Palliative Sedation for Patients with Advanced Cancer–Analysis from a Systematic Review of Prospective Studies

Sedation from analgesics: patient preference survey

[New recommendations on palliative sedation]

General practitioners and palliative care practices: a better knowledge of specific services is still needed

Sedation Experiences of Pediatric Intensive Care Nurses: Exploring PICU Nurse Perspectives on Sedative Management and Communication

Sedation indicated?—rethinking existential suffering: a narrative review

Optimizing Patient Comfort: Palliative Pain Management for Nurses in Critical Care Settings