Value of electron microscopy as perceived by nephrologists in Flanders, Belgium

Laura Desnerck Laure-Anne Kerckhaert Steven Van Laecke Amélie Dendooven a Faculty of Medicine,University of Ghent,Ghent,Belgiumb Department of Nephrology,University Hospital of Ghent,Ghent,Belgiumc Department of Pathology,University Hospital of Ghent,Ghent,Belgiumd Faculty of Medicine,University of Antwerp,Wilrijk,Belgium
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01913123.2024.2423083
2024-11-06
Ultrastructural Pathology
Abstract:Electron microscopy (EM) is an important complementary tool in biopsy diagnosis of kidney disease. However, EM is a costly technique and not universally available. In order to understand nephrologists' perspectives on EM, a survey among Flemish nephrologists was conducted. The survey explores nephrologists' knowledge and satisfaction with EM, the barriers in its use, and its role in decision-making. A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch-speaking nephrologists in Belgium (Flanders) via the professional organization NBVN (Nederlandstalige Belgische Vereniging voor Nefrologie) . The average satisfaction of EM accessibility in nephrologists, was 4.0 on a scale from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). The main barrier in ordering EM appeared to be the long turnaround time, indicated by 32.5% of nephrologists. The reports were found mostly understandable by 61.0% of the nephrologists. The impact of EM on diagnosis of kidney disease was estimated higher than its impact on the treatment: 24.4% of respondents estimated diagnosis changes in less than 5% of cases, versus 68.3% estimated treatment changes in less than 5% of cases. This study provides key insights into nephrologists' perception on EM services, revealing high overall satisfaction. However, there is potential for improvement, especially regarding turnaround times.
microscopy,pathology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?