Large HDL2 combined with inflammatory factors as superior predictors for coronary artery disease than small HDL3
Xiaoying Wu,Zhijian He,Runlu Sun,Xiangkun Xie,Qingqun Chen,Junjie Wang,Jinlan Bao,Jingjing Huang,Yuan Jiang,Yuling Zhang,Jingfeng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-948
IF: 3.616
2021-04-01
Annals of Translational Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether combinations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions and inflammatory markers would add value to coronary artery disease (CAD) prediction.METHODS: Non-CAD subjects (n=245) were stratified into low/moderate/high-Framingham risk (L/M/H-FR) groups and 180 CAD patients were enrolled. Levels of HDL-C, HDL<sub>2</sub>, HDL<sub>3</sub>, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured. Multivariable logistic models for CAD were estimated with a single parameter or all parameters together after adjustment for conventional risk factors (CRFs), and Z statistics, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to compare discrimination among different models.RESULTS: The results show that HDL-C, HDL<sub>2,</sub> and HDL<sub>3</sub> gradually decreased, while MCP-1 and hsCRP gradually increased from L/M/H-FR to the CAD group. When applying a single factor in the CRFs-adjusted models, HDL-C (OR 0.011, 95% CI, 0.002-0.071, P<0.05) and HDL<sub>2</sub> (OR 0.000072, 95% CI, 0.000001-0.004, P<0.05), but not HDL<sub>3</sub>, were significantly related to CAD risk. Only HDL<sub>2</sub> (OR 0.000072, 95% CI, 0.000001-0.004, P<0.001) remained significant when applying all HDL parameters. In the model including all HDL and inflammatory parameters, HDL<sub>2</sub> (OR 0.001, 95% CI, 0.000027-0.051), MCP-1 (OR 1.066, 95% CI, 1.039-1.094), and hsCRP (OR 1.130, 95% CI, 1.041-1.227) showed significant differences (all P<0.05). This combined model showed improved discrimination over the models with a single factor (P<0.05) or all HDL parameters (Z=3.299, NRI =0.179, IDI =0.081, P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Large HDL<sub>2</sub> is superior to small HDL<sub>3</sub> in the inverse association with CAD. The combination of HDL<sub>2</sub>, MCP-1, and hsCRP with CRFs provides an optimal prediction for CAD.
oncology,medicine, research & experimental