Abstract:Objective: The optimal degree of proximal thoracic endograft oversizing when aiming for durable sealing in prosthetic grafts is unknown. The aim of the present study was to create an in vitro model for testing different oversized thoracic endografts in a reproducible and standardized manner and, subsequently, determine the optimal oversizing range when planning procedures with a proximal landing in prosthetic zones in the descending thoracic aorta or aortic arch. Methods: An in vitro model consisting of a fixed 24-mm polyethylene terephthalate (Dacron; DuPont) graft sutured proximally and distally to two specifically designed 40-mm rings, with four force sensing resistors attached at four equally distant positions and a USB camera attached proximally for photographic and video documentation was used for deployment of Zenith TX2 (Cook Medical Inc) dissection platform endografts with diameters between 24 and 36 mm. After deployment, ballooning with a 32-mm compliant balloon was performed to simulate real-life conditions. The assessment of oversizing included visual inspection, calculation of the valley areas created between the prosthetic wall and the stent graft fabric, distance between the stent graft peaks, the radial force exerted by the proximal sealing stent, and the pull-out force necessary for endograft extraction. Results: A total of 70 endografts were deployed with the oversizing ranging from 0% to 50%: 10 × 24 mm, 10 × 26 mm, 10 × 28 mm, 10 × 30 mm, 10 × 32 mm, 10 × 34 mm, and 10 × 36 mm. Two cases of infolding occurred with 50% oversizing. The valley areas increased from 8.79 ± 0.23 mm2 with 16.7% oversizing to 14.26 ± 0.45 mm2 with 50% oversizing (P < .001). A significant difference was found in the pull-out force required for endografts with <10% oversizing vs ≥10% oversizing (P < .001). The difference reached a plateau at ∼4 N with oversizing of >15%. The mean radial force of the proximal sealing stent was greater after remodeling with a compliant balloon (0.55 ± 0.02 N vs 0.60 ± 0.02 N after ballooning; P < .001). However, greater oversizing did not lead to an increase in the radial force exerted by the proximal sealing stent. Conclusions: The findings from the present study offer additional insight into the mechanics of oversized stent grafts in surgical grafts. In endografts with the Zenith stent design (TX2), oversizing of <16.7% resulted in reduced resistance to displacement forces, and oversizing of >50% was associated with major infolding in 20% of cases. Long-term in vitro and in vivo testing is required to understand how these mechanical properties affect the clinical outcomes of oversizing.

Effective orifice diameter: a new sizing parameter of surgical valve prostheses to inform valve selection

An Approach for Designing Patient-Specific Prosthetic Aortic Valves Based on CTA Images Using Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) Method.

Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves

[Comparison of Aortic Annular Diameter Defined by Different Measurement Mordalities Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation].

Preprocedural computed tomography planning for surgical aortic valve replacement

Assessing the Impact of Valve Sizing and Orientation on Bioprosthetic Pulmonary Valve Hemodynamics Using In Vitro 4D-Flow MRI

Development of a Simple Analytical Model to Facilitate Preoperative Surgical Planning in Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement

Comparison of Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) and Standard Annulus Sizing Strategy in Type 0 Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Rationale and Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial

The perfect prosthesis/patient match: pursuit of the Holy Grail

Morphology Optimization of Leaflet for Surgical Reconstruction of the Aortic Valve: in Vitro Test and Simulation-Based DOE Study.

Pledget-Armed Sutures Affect the Haemodynamic Performance of Biologic Aortic Valve Substitutes: A Preliminary Experimental and Computational Study

In vitro evaluation of the optimal degree of oversizing of thoracic endografts in prosthetic landing areas: a pilot study

Predicting flow diverter sizing using the AneuGuideTM software: a validation study

Thrombogenic Risk Assessment of Transcatheter Prosthetic Heart Valves Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach

Challenging the Chronic Perverse Bias in Prosthetic Valve Design: A Pathway Opens for Advanced Mechanical Valves.

Intentional Oversizing of Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Is Bigger Better? A Large, Single-Center Experience

Comparison of the effective orifice area of prosthetic mitral valves using two-dimensional versus three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Novel Perceval Sizing Technique: Single Center Experience

Comparable efficacy and safety for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves using Wei's sizing method

Finite element modeling with patient‐specific geometry to assess clinical risks of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation

In Vivo Computed Tomography Sizing for Redo–Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Evolut Valves: Impact on Sizing, Feasibility, and Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch