Treatment of Skull Base Communicating Tumor with Endoscopeassisted Microneurosurgery and Diode Laser
Pan Jian-wei,Zhan Ren-ya,Tong Ying,Zheng Jie-sheng,Wan Shu,Huang Hong-guang,Ma Yue-hui,Zhou Yong-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200702020-00017
2007-01-01
Abstract:The skull base communicating tumor is characterized by simultaneous invasion of the intracranial and extracranial structures. The tumor may originate from the intracranial structures and invade extracranially, or vice versa. The total resection of the tumor is difficult, and a lot of complications may occur after the operation.1 From September 1998 to September 2002, 21 patients with skull base communicating tumors were treated in our hospital by endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery combined with diode laser through different operative approaches. CLINICAL DATA Manifestations Of the 21 cases, 12 were men and 9 were women, with a mean age of (39.8±10.7) years (9 to 68 years) and a mean course of the disease of (21.4±18.6) months (2 weeks to 5 years). The patients presented with headache and dizziness in 6 (28.6%), facial numbness in 3 (14.3%), exophthalmus in 6 (28.6%), ophthalmoplegia and diplopia in 5 (23.8%), visual regression in 5 (23.8%), rhinostegnosis in 6 (28.6%), somatasthenia in 1 (4.8%), temporal mass in 2 (9.5%), occipitocervical mass in 1 (4.8%), acoustic regression in 2 (9.5%), and multiple yellow papula in 1 (4.8%). Radiological features CT and MRI showed that the communicating tumors located at the anterior skull base in 10 patients, middle skull base in 6, posterior skull base in 2, and anterior-middle skull base in 3. Three-dimensional CT was performed in 7 patients to identify the tumor territory and the relationship between the tumor and the vessels. Nine tumors with abundant blood supply were evaluated by the digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and the ipsilateral external carotid arteries were embolized in 3 cases. Surgical treatment and prognosis All the patients underwent microsurgical operation through different operative approaches according to the nature and extent of the tumors (Table). During the operation, variously angled neuroendoscopes (ASCULP, Gemany) were used to observe the tumor and neurovascular structures in the region out of the microscopic field (Leica, Gemany). The diode laser (DioMED60, England) was utilized to liberate, vaporize and resect the tumor. The extracranial part of the tumor was removed before resecting the intracranial part. To the best of our abilities, vascular and malignant tumors were resected en bloc, and other benign tumors were removed bit by bit to reduce the injury of the normal structures (esp. brain tissue). Skull base was reconstructed after the tumor removal.Table: Pathology and extent of skull base communicating tumor and operative approachEach of the patients with squamous carcinoma at the anterior skull base, and osteochondroma, racemosum hemangioma, and meningioma at the middle skull base received subtotal resection; and each of the patients with esthesioneuroblastoma at the anterior skull base and osteosarcoma at the middle skull base underwent partial resection; the tumor of the other cases were totally resected. No operative mortality and severe complication occurred. The 6 patients received subtotal or partial resection resection and one patient with a totally resected squamous carcinoma were treated with radiotherapy or γ-knife after the operation. The patients were followed up for 2 to 5 years (mean 3.4±0.8). One of them who had an osteosarcoma at the middle skull base died, and two patients with a partially resected esthesioneuroblastoma or a subtotally resected squamous carcinoma had recurrence (Fig.).Fig.: Contrast enhanced MRI of a facial neurilemmoma. A: Before the operation, the tumor located at the middle cranial fossa. B: Before the operation, the tumor invaded into the petrous bone and subtemporal fossa.DISCUSSION The skull base communicating tumors invade several anatomical regions close to the neurovascular structures. The removal of these tumors is difficult and postoperative complications are frequent. The diagnosis of the tumor and the choice of operative approach and method depend on the results of CT, 3D-CT, MRI, and DSA. According to the location, size, property, and adjacent structures of the communicating tumors, the option of operative approach is varied.2 Our 21 cases were treated by transfrontal, pterion, transsphenoid, transoral, median suboccipital, paralateronasal, preauricular subtemporal, combined craniofacial approaches, respectively, and achieved satisfactory results. The paralateronasal, preauricular subtemporal and combined craniofacial approaches are rational when the extent and property of the tumor are uncertain. The incision can be extended along the upper orbital rim to the frontal region according to the extent of tumor when the paralateronasal approach is used.3 This approach is suitable for the communicating tumors at the anterior skull base, because the traction of the brain tissue is slight when the affected intraorbital tissues, ethmoid plate, and dura mater were resected, but the tumor invading the middle cranial fossa cannot be totally removed by the approach. Preauricular subtemporal approach4 can expose not only the middle and anterior skull base, but also the deep frontal and temporal structures and lesions by mildly tracting the frontal and temporal lobes. The approach prefer to the tumor in the cavernous sinus, petrous apex, upper and middle clivus, infratemporal fossa, pterygopalatine fossa, and nasopharyngeal region. It often results in satisfactory outcomes in patients with communicating tumors at the middle skull base (esp. epidural tumor) and mildly injured brain tissue. Combined craniofacial approach5 is helpful to determine the extent of the tumor and thoroughly remove the tumor invading the anterior and middle cranial fossa en bloc. By using the approach, the malignant tumor can be removed, and the important neurovascular structures (e.g. the brain tissues, cranial nerve, internal carotid artery, and cavernous sinus) can be protected, the skull base can be reconstructed, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage can be prevented. However, with this approach, the brain tissue is often pulled obviously, resulting in severe cerebral edema after the operation. The skull base communicating tumors have abundant blood supply and are always supplied by the external and internal carotid arteries simultaneously. Therefore, preoperative handling of the vessels supplying the tumor is crucial to reduce intraoperative bleeding. To the tumors with extensive invasion and abundant blood supply, endovascular embolization and the ligation of the external or common carotid artery should be done before the operation. Because the skull base communicating tumor has an extensive invasion (esp. the vascular and malignant tumors), it is hard to expose and remove it en bloc under a microscope, the residual tumor and injuries of the neurovascular structures caused by operation often affect the prognosis. Endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery can not only protect the important vessels and nerves at the skull base, but also reduce the incidence of other important structures injury,6 and thus can totally remove the tumor that was impossible to resect in the past. In this study, based on our knowledge on endoscopic microanatomy, variously angled endoscopes were used to observe the areas out of the microscopic field to avoid blind manipulation, especially for the resection of the intracranial part of the tumor. The angled endoscopes are able to uncover the important nerves and vessels (such as internal carotid artery, optic nerve etc.), improve the possibility of en bloc resection of vascular or malignant tumors, reduce the traction of the brain tissue and the unnecessary exposure during the operation. After the removal of the tumor, the endoscope was utilized to explore the areas behind the neurovascular structures and the traction of the nerves and vessels was not necessary when the residual tumor was vaporized and removed by diode laser.7 The diode laser can reduce the incidence of residue and recurrent of the tumor. Because the narrow endoscopic caliber limits the visual field and the variability of location after entering the cranium, the best operative approach should be adopted in terms of the position of the tumor. The diode laser can greatly increase the temperature of the irradiated tissues, resulting in protein denaturation, coagulation and necrosis, and even charing and vaporization. The laser is effective on the dissection, hemostasis, and vaporization of the tumor at the skull base, especially for those which had abundant blood supply and is hard to be excised, or located at the important regions (e.g. the vicinity of brainstem) that cannot be pulled. Diode laser can reduce bleeding and keep clear visual field, eliminate traction and shorten operative time.8 Low power laser (1−5 W) is useful to coagulate and shrink the tumor capsule and coagulate the blood vessels in the surface, while high power laser (5−10 W) can be used in intracystic excision. The power should be adjusted according to the blood supply, and property and location of the tumor. The high power laser is suitable for the tumor with abundant blood supply, but not for the tumor in the regions near the important structures. Thus elevating the power of laser within a safe extent can improve the velocity of dissection and shorten operative time. In addition, the effect of sterilization of the diode laser can provide a good sterile environment for operation, reduce the secondary infection, which is important for a skull base communicating tumor. In this study, all the patients except one survived without severe complications after the microsurgery with a high rate of total resection. The dural defect after resection of the communicating tumor at the skull base followed by intracranial infection may result in cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Therefore, the skull base reconstruction is very important. To prevent postoperative complications, dura mater must be repaired closely in skull base reconstruction. The free or pedicle graft should be put outside to strengthen the dura mater, and the skull base bone defect should be repaired if necessary.9 In all of our patients, the skull base was reconstructed, the dura mater was repaired by pericranium, temporal aponeurosis, and temporal muscle flap, and the bone was restored using titanium plate or self-bone if the diameter of the defect was over 3 cm. The extracranial tumor cavity was filled by temporal muscle or fat. No complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial infection occurred in our patients.