Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">The spatial interaction model is an effective way to explore the geographical disparities inherent in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by simulating spatial flows. The traditional gravity model implies the hypothesis of equilibrium points without any reference to when or how to achieve it. In this paper, a dynamic gravity model was established based on the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) theory to estimate and monitor the interconnection intensity and dynamic characters of bilateral relations. In order to detect the determinants of interconnection intensity, a Geodetector method was applied to identify and evaluate the determinants of spatial networks in five dimensions. The empirical study clearly demonstrates a heterogeneous and non-circular spatial structure. The main driving forces of spatial-temporal evolution are foreign direct investment, tourism and railway infrastructure construction, while determinants in different sub-regions show obvious spatial differentiation. Southeast Asian countries are typically multi-island area where aviation infrastructure plays a more important role. North and Central Asian countries regard oil as a pillar industry where power and port facilities have a greater impact on the interconnection. While Western Asian countries are mostly influenced by the railway infrastructure, Eastern European countries already have relatively robust infrastructure where tariff policies provide a greater impetus.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the spatiotemporal evolution and its determining factors under the spatial interaction model of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The authors use the Maximum Entropy Gravity Model to estimate and monitor the strength of interconnectedness and its dynamic characteristics in bilateral relations. Through this method, the research reveals the heterogeneity and non-cyclical spatial structure of inter-country connectivity under the BRI.
The paper points out that the implementation of the BRI faces multiple challenges, including environmental degradation, China's own predicaments, and the capability gap in complex situations in Central Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East. However, the initiative is also seen as part of global sustainable development, reflecting the principles of the United Nations Charter, and is gradually becoming a common responsibility of various countries.
The study finds that foreign direct investment, tourism, and railway infrastructure construction are the main driving forces behind the spatiotemporal evolution under the BRI. However, these driving factors show significant spatial differences in different subregions. For example, in Southeast Asian countries, aviation infrastructure plays a more important role; in North and Central Asian countries, the oil industry is considered a pillar industry, and electricity and port facilities have a greater impact on connectivity; West Asian countries are more influenced by railway infrastructure; Eastern European countries already have solid infrastructure, and tariff policies provide a greater impetus.
To analyze the determinants of the strength of interconnectedness, the study applied the geographical detector method, identifying and assessing the determinants of the spatial network from five dimensions. Empirical research clearly demonstrates the heterogeneity and non-cyclical spatial structure, as well as the significant spatial differences in determinants between different subregions.
In summary, the paper aims to explore the strength of connectivity, spatial differences, and their dynamic mechanisms among the countries involved in the BRI, providing in-depth analysis and insights for promoting the development and enhancement of regional relations.