Modulation of sleep/wake patterns by gephyrin phosphorylation status

Yuan‐Chen Tsai,Waleed ElGrawani,Christine Muheim,Andrea Spinnler,Benjamin F. N. Campbell,Denis Lasic,Mohammad Hleihil,Steven A. Brown,Shiva K. Tyagarajan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16464
IF: 3.698
2024-07-20
European Journal of Neuroscience
Abstract:Gabra1 KO shows changes in NREM sleep in the dark phase, whereas the Gabra2 KO shows NREM sleep changes only in the parietal cortex where α2 subunit expression is high. Targeted proteomics analysis using tissue from sleep and sleep‐deprived cortical tissue shows sleep‐specific gephyrin interactome and gephyrin phosphorylation changes. Consistent with our protein data, AAV transgene expression of gephyrin‐S268A/S270A mutant phenocopies NREM sleep changes observed in Gabra1 KO, whereas gephyrin‐S303A/S305A mutant does not impact NREM sleep. Sleep/wake cycles intricately shape physiological activities including cognitive brain functions, yet the precise molecular orchestrators of sleep remain elusive. Notably, the clinical impact of benzodiazepine drugs underscores the pivotal role of GABAergic neurotransmission in sleep regulation. However, the specific contributions of distinct GABAA receptor subtypes and their principal scaffolding protein, gephyrin, in sleep dynamics remain unclear. The evolving role of synaptic phospho‐proteome alterations at excitatory and inhibitory synapses suggests a potential avenue for modulating gephyrin and, consequently, GABAARs for sleep through on‐demand kinase recruitment. Our study unveils the distinctive roles of two prevalent GABAA receptor subtypes, α1‐ and α2‐GABAARs, in influencing sleep duration and electrical sleep activity. Notably, the absence of α1‐GABAARs emerges as central in sleep regulation, manifesting significant alterations in both non‐rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep during dark or active phases, accompanied by altered electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns across various frequencies. Gephyrin proteomics analysis reveals sleep/wake‐dependent interactions with a repertoire of known and novel kinases. Crucially, we identify the regulation of gephyrin interaction with ERK1/2, and phosphorylations at serines 268 and 270 are dictated by sleep/wake cycles. Employing AAV‐eGFP‐gephyrin or its phospho‐null variant (S268A/S270A), we disrupt sleep either globally or locally to demonstrate gephyrin phosphorylation as a sleep regulator. In summary, our findings support the local cortical sleep hypothesis and we unveil a molecular mechanism operating at GABAergic synapses, providing critical insights into the intricate regulation of sleep.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?