Abstract:265 Background: Studies reveal a mismatch between the goals of care (GOC) of cancer patients and actual care received. The 10 members of the Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers (ADCC) convened the Improving Goal Concordant Care (IGCC) initiative to address system gaps. IGCC was led by palliative care and oncology experts, with guidance from patient and family advisors. Uniquely, the advisors were identified from patient family advisory councils (PFAC) at each center, forming a collaborative Advisory Group (AG) with the lived experience of each center and the knowledge of advocating for the patient/family voice locally. Methods: PFAC members were recruited from each site to serve on the AG. The 19 member AG met quarterly, with minutes shared with the IGCC oversight group, the Implementation Workgroup (IWG). In September 2023, all AG members were surveyed about perceptions of PFAC engagement and local impact of IGCC. In May 2024, 20 IWG members were surveyed about implementation successes and barriers, including items related to PFAC engagement. Results: AG evaluation and recommendations altered IGCC planned core implementation and evaluation actions meaningfully; for example in 1) selection of structured fields in electronic health record (EHR) and universally accessible GOC documentation and in 2) centering patients in the GOC measure set, including incorporating “Heard & Understood” survey into IGCC evaluation. Other AG guidance around direct patient engagement readiness for GOC conversations and implementing patient GOC surveys was left to individual sites to consider with variable adoption. AG Survey: 63% response rate. 80% noted that the GOC program was discussed with their local PFAC and 92% experienced changed routine patient care after GOC implementation. IWG Survey: 100% response rate. 68% agreed that their center sought guidance from their PFAC during GOC implementation and that leadership presented to their PFAC about their GOC implementation. 26% indicated reporting data to their PFAC; of those that did, 80% agreed that this positively impacted their GOC implementation. Conclusions: While PFACs are occasionally included in quality interventions, this model centered the patient/family voice by supporting a PFAC stakeholder feedback loop working collaboratively and locally to support implementation and evaluation of IGCC objectives. While not all AG recommendations were formally integrated into IGCC, all were considered and many adopted at individual centers. Despite ongoing IGCC-level involvement, center-specific engagement of PFACs varied. Future efforts can track this during process evaluation as local PFAC engagement was highly valued. Consensus building for national best practice implementation and evaluation by recruiting local experts including PFAC members into national collaborative efforts is a successful model for local change.

Enhancing Primary Care and Community Health: A NAPCRG Report on 2 Conferences

Global Approaches to Integrated Care: Best Practices and Ongoing Innovation.

Primary Care Research: Looking Back and Moving Forward With Reflections on NAPCRG's First 50 Years

Fifty Years of Connection: Characterizing the Social Network of a Primary Care Research Organization

Population health in primary care

Improve Advance Care Planning: A Brief Report Discussing Goals of Care Interventions to Improve Communication Among Health Care Teams and Patients Maximizing the Use of the Electronic Health Record Tools

Improving health, eliminating disparities: finding solutions for better health care for all populations

Organizing Primary Care Clinicians to Expand Reproductive Health Access: A Qualitative Program Evaluation

Integrating Servant Leadership into the Fabric of NAPCRG

Primary Palliative Care Improves Uptake of Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Advanced Cancers

Advancing the Science of Palliative Care: Contributions of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group

Advance Care Planning Engagement Strategies for Primary Care Providers Seeing Diverse Patient Populations: A Scoping Review

Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study

Improving age‐friendly advance care planning in primary care: Outcomes from a Pacific Northwest learning collaborative

Community-Campus Partnership in Action: Lessons Learned from the Du Page County Patient Navigation Collaborative

Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: The views of members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe

Community Grand Rounds: Re-Engineering Community and Academic Partnerships in Health Education—A Partnership and Programmatic Evaluation

Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Multidisciplinary Intervention vs Usual Care on Advance Care Planning for Vulnerable Older Adults in an Accountable Care Organization: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Improving goal-concordant care via a uniquely collaborative and multi-site PFAC model.

What AHRQ Learned While Working to Transform Primary Care

Improving colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice: innovative strategies and future directions