More than one shade of pink as a marker of early amelanotic/hypomelanotic

M. A. Pizzichetta,P. Corsetti,I. Stanganelli,G. Ghigliotti,S. Cavicchini,V. De Giorgi,R. Bono,S. Astorino,S. Ribero,G. Argenziano,Alaibac,J. Polesel,the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) and the Società Italiana di Dermatologia Chirurgica, Oncologica, Correttiva ed Estetica (SIDCO)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.17200
IF: 3.468
2024-03-26
The Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma (AHM) may be difficult to diagnose because of a lack of pigmentation. To evaluate whether dermoscopy can be useful for the diagnosis of early AHM, 133 digital dermoscopic images of lesions histopathologically diagnosed as amelanotic/hypomelanotic superficial spreading melanoma with ≤1 mm thickness (AHSSMs) (n = 27), amelanotic/hypomelanotic non‐melanocytic lesions (AHNMLs) (e.g., seborrhoeic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma) (n = 79), and amelanotic/hypomelanotic benign melanocytic lesions (AHBMLs) (e.g., compound and dermal nevi) (n = 27), were dermoscopically assessed by three blinded dermatologists. Using multivariate analysis, we found a significantly increased risk of diagnosing AHSSM versus AHNML and AHBML when the lesion was characterized by the presence of more than one shade of pink (odds ratio [OR] 37.11), irregular dots/globules (OR 23.73), asymmetric pigmentation (OR 8.85), and structureless pattern (OR 7.33). In conclusion, dermoscopy may improve early AHM detection, discriminating AHSSM from AHNMLs.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?