Treatment of patients with BRAF V600E -mutated metastatic colorectal cancer after progression to encorafenib and cetuximab: data from a real-world nationwide dataset

M.M. Germani,G. Vetere,F. Santamaria,R. Intini,F. Ghelardi,M. Bensi,A. Boccaccino,A. Minelli,M. Carullo,P. Ciracì,A. Passardi,S. Santucci,R. Giampieri,M. Persano,E. Fenocchio,A. Puccini,S. Lonardi,F. Pietrantonio,L. Salvatore,C. Cremolini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102996
IF: 6.883
2024-04-13
ESMO Open
Abstract:Little evidence is available regarding treatments and determinants of outcome after progressive disease (PD) to encorafenib + cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E - mutated mCRC. About 47% and 18% of patients received one or more and two or more lines of therapy after encorafenib + cetuximab, respectively. Receiving encorafenib + cetuximab after the second line and the presence of ascites at PD were independently associated with shorter survival. After PD, combinatory chemotherapy ± anti-VEGF was the most efficacious treatment regimen. Targeted therapy (TT) with encorafenib and cetuximab is the current standard for patients with BRAF V600E - mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who received one or more prior systemic treatments. However, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) is ∼4 months, and little is known about the possibility of administering subsequent therapies, their efficacy, and clinicopathological determinants of outcome. A real-world dataset including patients with BRAF V600E - mutated mCRC treated with TT at 21 Italian centers was retrospectively interrogated. We assessed treatments after progression, attrition rates, and outcomes. Of the 179 patients included, 85 (47%), 32 (18%), and 7 (4%) received one, two, or three lines of treatment after TT, respectively. Those receiving TT in the second line were more likely to receive at least one subsequent therapy (53%), as compared with those treated with TT in the third line or beyond (30%; P < 0.0001), and achieved longer postprogression survival (PPS), also in a multivariate model ( P = 0.0001). Among 62 patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors receiving one or more lines of treatment after second-line TT, combinatory chemotherapy ± anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) was associated with longer PFS and PPS as compared with trifluridine–tipiracil or regorafenib (mPFS: 2.6 versus 2.0 months, P = 0.07; PPS: 6.5 versus 4.4 months, P = 0.04). Our real-world data suggest that TT should be initiated as soon as possible after the failure of first-line treatment in BRAF V600E -mutated mCRC. Among patients with pMMR/MSS tumors, combinatory chemotherapy ± anti-VEGF appears the preferred treatment choice after TT failure.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?