Sensorimotor Synchronization and Neural Entrainment to Imagined Rhythms in Individuals With Proficient Imagery Ability

Simon Andrew Whitton,Benjamin Sreenan,Canhuang Luo,Fang Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.25383
IF: 4.433
2024-09-19
Journal of Neuroscience Research
Abstract:We examined the contribution of imagery to sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) performance of proficient imagers, utilizing a synchronization–continuation paradigm that included an auditory or visual distractor task during the continuation phase. While the visual distractor task had minimal effect, SMS consistency was significantly impacted by the auditory distractor task. Our electroencephalography analysis revealed beat‐related (1.67 Hz) neural entrainment to the guiding visual stimulus during the synchronization phase (a) and during the continuation phase without guiding visual stimulus only when the visual (c) or auditory (d) distractor tasks were present. During continuation with the auditory distractor task (d), the neural entrainment showed an occipital electrode distribution, suggesting the involvement of visual imagery. Unique to SMS continuation with the auditory distractor task, neural and sub‐vocal (measured with electromyography) entrainment were found at the three‐beat pattern frequency. In this most difficult condition, proficient imagers employed both beat‐ and pattern‐related imagery strategies. Our results suggest that proficient imagers effectively utilized beat‐related imagery in one modality when imagery in another modality was limited. Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) is the temporal coordination of motor movements with external or imagined stimuli. Finger‐tapping studies indicate better SMS performance with auditory or tactile stimuli compared to visual. However, SMS with a visual rhythm can be improved by enriching stimulus properties (e.g., spatiotemporal content) or individual differences (e.g., one's vividness of auditory imagery). We previously showed that higher self‐reported vividness of auditory imagery led to more consistent synchronization–continuation performance when participants continued without a guiding visual rhythm. Here, we examined the contribution of imagery to the SMS performance of proficient imagers, including an auditory or visual distractor task during the continuation phase. While the visual distractor task had minimal effect, SMS consistency was significantly worse when the auditory distractor task was present. Our electroencephalography analysis revealed beat‐related neural entrainment, only when the visual or auditory distractor tasks were present. During continuation with the auditory distractor task, the neural entrainment showed an occipital electrode distribution, suggesting the involvement of visual imagery. Unique to SMS continuation with the auditory distractor task, we found neural and sub‐vocal (measured with electromyography) entrainment at the three‐beat pattern frequency. In this most difficult condition, proficient imagers employed both beat‐ and pattern‐related imagery strategies. However, this combination was insufficient to restore SMS consistency to that observed with visual or no distractor task. Our results suggest that proficient imagers effectively utilized beat‐related imagery in one modality when imagery in another modality was limited.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?