Abstract:Self-report questionnaires play a crucial role in healthcare for assessing disease risks, yet their extensive length can be burdensome for respondents, potentially compromising data quality. To address this, machine learning-based shortened questionnaires have been developed. While these questionnaires possess high levels of accuracy, their practical use in clinical settings is hindered by a lack of transparency and the need for specialized machine learning expertise. This makes their integration into clinical workflows challenging and also decreases trust among healthcare professionals who prefer interpretable tools for decision-making. To preserve both predictive accuracy and interpretability, this study introduces the Symbolic Regression-Based Clinical Score Generator (SymScore). SymScore produces score tables for shortened questionnaires, which enable clinicians to estimate the results that reflect those of the original questionnaires. SymScore generates the score tables by optimally grouping responses, assigning weights based on predictive importance, imposing necessary constraints, and fitting models via symbolic regression. We compared SymScore performance with the machine learning-based shortened questionnaires MCQI-6 (n = 310) and SLEEPS (n = 4257), both renowned for their high accuracy in assessing sleep disorders. SymScore questionnaire demonstrated comparable performance (MAE = 10.73, R2 = 0.77) to that of the MCQI-6 (MAE = 9.94, R2 = 0.82) and achieved AUROC values of 0.85-0.91 for various sleep disorders, closely matching those of SLEEPS (0.88-0.94). By generating accurate and interpretable score tables, SymScore ensures that healthcare professionals can easily explain and trust its results without specialized machine learning knowledge. Thus, Sym-Score advances explainable AI for healthcare by offering a user-friendly and resource-efficient alternative to machine learning-based questionnaires, supporting improved patient outcomes and workflow efficiency.

Scoring systems developed by machine learning: intelligent but simple to use?

Development of scoring system for risk stratification in clinical medicine: a step-by-step tutorial.

Predicting the Outcome of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Machine-Learning-Guided Scorecard

Learning Optimized Risk Scores

Designing optimal mortality risk prediction scores that preserve clinical knowledge

A novel hyperparameter search approach for accuracy and simplicity in disease prediction risk scoring

A New Approach for Interpretability and Reliability in Clinical Risk Prediction: Acute Coronary Syndrome Scenario

Perioperative risk scores: prediction, pitfalls, and progress

Bringing Modern Machine Learning into Clinical Practice Through the Use of Intuitive Visualization and Human–Computer Interaction

Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions

Fast and Interpretable Mortality Risk Scores for Critical Care Patients

Explainable AI for clinical risk prediction: a survey of concepts, methods, and modalities

Probabilistic Scoring Lists for Interpretable Machine Learning

SymScore: Machine Learning Accuracy Meets Transparency in a Symbolic Regression-Based Clinical Score Generator

Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice

An interpretable machine learning method for risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndrome

An Interpretable Intensive Care Unit Mortality Risk Calculator

Machine learning models' assessment: trust and performance

Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms

Predicting Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications through a Graph-Based Risk Scoring System

A Machine-Learning-Guided Scorecard