Abstract:Background and purpose: Distant metastasis in bladder cancer is linked to poor prognosis and significant mortality. Machine learning (ML), a key area of artificial intelligence, has shown promise in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of bladder cancer. This study aimed to employ various ML techniques to predict distant metastasis in patients with bladder cancer. Patients and methods: Patients diagnosed with bladder cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2021 were included in this study. After a rigorous screening process, a total of 4,108 patients were selected for further analysis, divided in a 7:3 ratio into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort. In addition, 118 patients treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included as an external validation cohort. Features were filtered using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm. Based on the significant features identified, three ML algorithms were utilized to develop prediction models: logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The predictive performance of the three models was evaluated by obtaining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), the precision, the accuracy, and the F1 score. Results: According to the statistical results, the final probability of distant metastasis in the population was 12.0% ( n = 495). LASSO regression analysis revealed that age, chemotherapy, tumor size, the examination of non-regional lymph nodes, and regional lymph node evaluation were significantly associated with distant metastasis of bladder cancer. In the internal validation cohort, the prediction accuracy rates for logistic regression, SVM, and LDA were 0.874, 0.877, and 0.845, respectively. The precision rates were 0.805, 0.769, and 0.827, respectively, and the F1 scores were 0.821, 0.819, and 0.835, respectively. The ROC curve demonstrated that the AUC for all models was greater than 0.7. In the external validation cohort, the prediction accuracy rates for logistic regression, SVM, and LDA were 0.856, 0.848, and 0.797, respectively, with the ROC curve indicating that the AUC also exceeded 0.7. The precision rates were 0.877, 0.718, and 0.736, respectively, and the F1 scores were 0.797, 0.778, and 0.762, respectively. Among the algorithms used, logistic regression demonstrated better predictive efficiency than the other two methods. The top three variables with the highest importance scores in the logistic regression were non-regional lymph nodes, age, and chemotherapy. Conclusion: The prediction model developed using three ML algorithms demonstrated strong accuracy and discriminative capability in predicting distant metastasis in patients with bladder cancer. This might help clinicians in understanding patient prognosis and in formulating personalized treatment strategies, ultimately improving the overall prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.

Machine learning for predicting liver and/or lung metastasis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study based on the SEER database

Application of machine learning techniques in real-world research to predict the risk of liver metastasis in rectal cancer

Construction and validation of machine learning models for predicting distant metastases in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients: A large‐scale and real‐world cohort study

Prediction of lung metastases in thyroid cancer using machine learning based on SEER database

Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of distant metastasis from gastric cancer: a real world retrospective study

Risk Assessment of Liver Metastasis in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Using Multiple Models Based on Machine Learning: A Large Population-Based Study

Application of artificial intelligence in a real-world research for predicting the risk of liver metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer

Prediction of hepatic metastasis in esophageal cancer based on machine learning

Dynamic Predictive Models with Visualized Machine Learning for Assessing the Risk of Lung Metastasis in Kidney Cancer Patients

Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Brain Metastasis in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis in renal carcinoma

Use machine learning to predict pulmonary metastasis of esophageal cancer: a population-based study

A radiomics and genomics-derived model for predicting metastasis and prognosis in colorectal cancer

Predictive Models Based on Machine Learning for Bone Metastasis in Patients with Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer

Personalized Prediction of Postoperative Complication and Survival Among Colorectal Liver Metastases Patients Receiving Simultaneous Resection Using Machine Learning Approaches: A Multi-center Study

Predictive modeling algorithms for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the current literature

Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Distant Metastasis of T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer Based on SEER Database

Predicting distant metastasis of bladder cancer using multiple machine learning models: a study based on the SEER database with external validation

Multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics model for the prediction of rectal cancer metachronous liver metastasis

Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Prognostication of colorectal cancer liver metastasis by CE-based radiomics and machine learning