Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) in identifying benign and malignant renal masses and differentiating the histological types of renal masses. METHODS:Fifteen healthy volunteers and 46 patients with renal masses proven by pathology, including clear cell carcinomas (n = 18), papillary carcinomas (n = 8), chromophobe carcinomas (n = 7) and angiomyolipomas (n = 13), were examined with DWI and PWI scan at 3.0 T MRI. ANOVA was employed to compare the values of transfer constant (K(trans)), rate constant of backflux (Kep) and extra-vascular extra-cellular space fractional volume (Ve) proceeded by PWI and the value of ADC resulted from DWI between normal kidney and different histological types of renal masses. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of the methods of PWI and DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. RESULTS:The ADC value of normal renal parenchyma was (2.10 ± 0.24) × 10⁻³ mm²/s, which was statistically higher than benign and malignant renal masses (P < 0.05). The ADC value of benign masses was statistically higher than that of all histological types of malignant masses (P < 0.05). Among three histological types of malignancies, clear cell carcinoma showed the statistically highest ADC value (P < 0.05). But the difference between papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Values of K(trans), Kep and Ve between normal renal parenchyma and different histological types of renal masses had statistical differences.Values of K(trans) and Ve in three histological types of malignant renal masses were statistically higher than those of benign renal masses.Kep value of clear cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that of benign renal masses (P < 0.05).However, other histological types of malignant masses had no significant difference with benign masses.For three malignant masses, K(trans) of clear cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and chromophobe carcinoma were (0.85 ± 0.27), (0.51 ± 0.04) and (0.39 ± 0.05)/min respectively. All values gradually reduced. And the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The Ve value of renal clear cell carcinoma was statistically higher than that of papillary carcinoma (P < 0.05). ROC curve was used to analyze and compare the diagnostic value of PWI versus DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. The K(trans) of benign and malignant renal masses had the largest AUC (AUC = 0.937) at a threshold of 0.38/min. And there were a sensitivity of 87.9% and a specificity of 85.7%. The AUC of ADC was 0.823, sensitivity 72.7% and specificity 92.9%. The ADC threshold for differentiating benign from malignant masses was 1.40 × 10⁻³ mm²/s; AUC of Ve 0.803, sensitivity 78.8% and specificity 71.4%, a threshold of 0.29/min; Kep showed lower diagnostic value. CONCLUSION:3.0 T MRI DWI and PWI can effectively differentiate benign and different histological types of malignant renal masses. And PWI is superior to DWI in differentiating benign and malignant renal masses.K(trans) with the largest AUC showed the highest diagnostic value. And ADC is also irreplaceable in providing the information of cellular structural features and the movement of water diffusion.

The Influence of Anthropometric Factors on Renal mpMRI: Insights From Regional Analysis

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Kidneys: Effects of Regional, Side, and Hydration Variations on Functional Quantifications

Blood Oxygen Level Dependent MRI of Normal Kidney and Its Correlation with Physiological Indexes

Associations of MRI-derived kidney volume, kidney function, body composition, and physical performance in ∼38,000 UK Biobank participants: a population-based observational study

Feasibility of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging at 3T for Renal Masses: A Preliminary Study.

Renal mass imaging modalities: does body mass index (BMI) matter?

Quantitative assessment of renal structural and functional changes in chronic kidney disease using multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging

Multiparametric Renal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation, Interventions, and Alterations in Chronic Kidney Disease

Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Evaluate Kidney Structure, Function, and Pathology: Moving Toward Clinical Application

Evaluation of Early Renal Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Multiparametric MR Imaging

[Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Renal Masses on 3.0 T MRI].

MRI quantitative T1 and T2 mapping of the renal cortex: Assessment of normal values and potential usefulness for renal masses at 3 T

A preliminary study of renal function for renal artery stenosis using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Renal Oxygenation Characteristics in Healthy Native Kidneys: Assessment with Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Multiparametric Renal Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction and Annual Monitoring of the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease over Two Years

Multiparametric Aging Study Across Adulthood in the Leg Through Quantitative MR Imaging, 1H Spectroscopy, and 31P Spectroscopy at 3T

Investigating MRI‐Associated Biological Aspects of Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer for African American and White Men

3T-MRI-based age, sex and site-specific markers of musculoskeletal health in healthy children and young adults

Renal Adiposity Confounds Quantitative Assessment Of Markers Of Renal Diffusion With Mri A Proposed Correction Method

Renal Water Molecular Diffusion Characteristics In Healthy Native Kidneys: Assessment With Diffusion Tensor Mr Imaging

Concentric-object and equiangular-object methods to perform standardized regional analysis in renal mpMRI