Abstract:A social network confers benefits and advantages on individuals (and on groups); the literature refers to these benefits and advantages as social capital. An individuals social capital depends on its position in the network and on the shape of the networkbut positions in the network and the shape of the network are determined endogenously and change as the network forms and evolves. This paper presents a micro-founded mathematical model of the evolution of a social network and of the social capital of individuals within the network. The evolution of the network and of social capital are driven by exogenous and endogenous processesentry, meeting, linkingthat have both random and deterministic components. These processes are influenced by the extent to which individuals are homophilic (prefer others of their own type), structurally opportunistic (prefer neighbors of neighbors to strangers), socially gregarious (desire more or fewer connections) and by the distribution of types in the society. In the analysis, we identify different kinds of social capital: bonding capital refers to links to others; popularity capital refers to links from others; bridging capital refers to connections between others. We show that each form of capital plays a different role and is affected differently by the characteristics of the society. Bonding capital is created by forming a circle of connections; homophily increases bonding capital because it makes this circle of connections more homogeneous. Popularity capital leads to preferential attachment : individuals who become popular tend to become more and more popular because others are more likely to link to them. Homophily creates inequality in the popularity capital attained by different social categories; more gregarious types of agents are more likely to become popular. However, in homophilic societies, individuals who belong to less gregarious, less opportunistic, or major types are likely to be more central in the network and thus acquire a bridging capital. And, while extreme homophily maximizes an individuals bonding capital, it also creates structural holes in the network, which hinder the exchange of ideas and information across social categories. Such structural holes represent a potential source of bridging capital: non-homophilic (tolerant or open-minded) individuals can fill these holes and broker interactions at the interface between different social categories.

THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF DIVERSE GROUPS: INTEGRATING SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION AND NETWORK PERSPECTIVES

Structural Diversity and Homophily: A Study Across More than One Hundred Big Networks

How networks shape diversity for better or worse

An Experimental Study of Structural Diversity in Social Networks

Emerging Insights on the Role of Social Networks in Intergroup Friendship

Why understanding multiplex social network structuring processes will help us better understand the evolution of human behavior

Is Being Connected to Leaders Always Beneficial? Instrumental Interaction and the Development of Social Capital Within Organisational Networks

New Developments in Social Network Analysis

Network Structure shapes the Impact of Diversity in Collective Learning

The hidden architecture of connections: How do multidimensional identities shape our social networks?

Network Analysis in the Social Sciences

Intersectional inequalities in social networks

Effects of Network Connectivity and Functional Diversity Distribution on Human Collective Ideation

Status Fulfillment through Social Networks: Impact of Hierarchies on Social Differentiation and Well-being

Creating a Better World Together: How Different Groups Create, Maintain, and Utilize Their Networks

Time for Change: A Dynamic Perspective of Employee Social Networks

Beyond dark and bright: towards a more holistic understanding of inter-group networks

The Strength of Structural Diversity in Online Social Networks

A Micro-Foundation of Social Capital in Evolving Social Networks