Abstract:BackgroundOur group conducted a cluster-randomised trial in 100 villages of Orissa, India to measure the impact of a rural sanitation intervention implemented under the government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, on diarrhoea and soil-transmitted helminth infections. This paper reports on a process evaluation conducted in the context of the trial.MethodsProcess evaluation data were collected through review of key documentation, quantitative surveys, direct observations, and semi-structured interviews with staff from implementing NGOs and community members. Between March 2011 and March 2012, trained enumerators recorded observations on latrine construction status every 6–8 weeks in the 50 intervention villages and noted activities reported to have taken place based on NGO staff interviews and review of NGO records. A survey among 10% of households in intervention and control villages was conducted to compare levels of awareness of key intervention components. In addition, 10% of village water and sanitation committee (VWSC) members were interviewed to measure their level of involvement in the intervention delivery.ResultsThe percentage of households with a latrine (completed or under construction) increased from 8% at baseline to 66% one year after the start of the intervention in March 2012. Almost none of the intervention households recall any form of participatory community-level activities at the start of the programme, although intervention households were generally more aware of the Total Sanitation Campaign (91% versus 49%, p < 0.001), VWSCs (51% versus 9%, p < 0.001), adolescent girls groups (23% versus 8%, p < 0.01), wall paintings (44% versus 7%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to report a household visit on sanitation during the past three months (65% versus 3%, p < 0.001). We found no strong evidence of an association between levels of awareness of or participation in mobilisation activities and levels of latrine coverage in intervention villages.ConclusionsThe levels of coverage achieved and the levels of awareness of the mobilisation process in our intervention villages were lower than planned, but similar to those reported elsewhere in India under the TSC. Our process evaluation highlights important gaps between the TSC guidelines and their implementation on the ground.Trial registrationNumber on clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01214785

Community matters: Heterogeneous impacts of a sanitation intervention

Sanitation and work time: Evidence from the toilet revolution in rural China

Benefit–Cost Analysis of Community-Led Total Sanitation: Incorporating Results from Recent Evaluations

Poor awareness and attitudes to sanitation servicing can impede China's Rural Toilet Revolution: Evidence from Western China

Impact of an Urban Sanitation Intervention on Enteric Pathogen Detection in Soils

Impact Evaluation of Training Natural Leaders during a Community-Led Total Sanitation Intervention: A Cluster-Randomized Field Trial in Ghana

Spillovers without Social Interactions in Urban Sanitation

Comprehending practitioners' assessments of community-led total sanitation

Benefits and Costs of a Community-Led Total Sanitation Intervention in Rural Ethiopia—A Trial-Based Ex Post Economic Evaluation

Effects of a community-driven water, sanitation and hygiene intervention on water and sanitation infrastructure, access, behaviour, and governance: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Democratic Republic of Congo

Social setting, gender, and preferences for improved sanitation: Evidence from experimental games in rural India

Do Sanitation Marketing Activities Increase Households' Likelihoods of Reaching Improved Sanitation or Involving Women in Decision Making?

Valuing Open Defecation Free Surroundings: Experimental Evidence from a Norm-Based Intervention in India

Evaluation of a district-wide sanitation programme in rural Malawi: does it include people living with disabilities?

Evidence on designing sanitation interventions

Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India

Promotion of toilet construction and usage in rural Tamil Nadu: A mixed-methods evaluation study

Building Cross-Sector Collaboration to Improve Community Health

Do Sanitation Improvements Reduce Fecal Contamination of Water, Hands, Food, Soil, and Flies? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh

Effect of a Low-Cost Behaviour Change Intervention on Latrine Use and Safe Child Faeces Disposal in Rural Odisha, India: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Influence of social factors on adoption of sanitation practices in rural areas: a mixed methods study in Nzaui, Kenya