Tenofovir versus lamivudine followed by tenofovir in severe exacerbation of hepatitis B: a randomized controlled study

Chia-Ming Lu,Jin-Shiung Cheng,Wei-Chih Sun,Wen-Chi Chen,Feng-Woei Tsay,Huay-Min Wang,Tzung-Jiun Tsai,Sung-Shuo Kao,Yun-Da Li,Yuan-Rong Li,Huey-Shyan Lin,Chun-Hao Yin,Wei-Lun Tsai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01664-21
IF: 5.938
2021-11-24
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Abstract:Spontaneous severe acute exacerbation (SAE) is not uncommon in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Lamivudine (LAM) had the advantages of low price, quick onset, good efficacy and no drug resistance within 24 weeks. This study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and LAM for 24 weeks followed by TDF in the treatment of CHB with severe acute exacerbation. Consecutive patients of CHB with SAE were randomized to receive either TDF (19 patients) or LAM for 24 weeks followed by TDF (18 patients). The primary endpoint was overall mortality or receipt of liver transplantation by week 24. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (VGHKS12-CT5-10). The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. By week 24, seven (37%) and five (28%) patients in the TDF and LAM/TDF groups died or received liver transplantation (P=0.487). Multivariate analysis showed that albumin level, prothrombin time (PT), and hepatic encephalopathy were independent factors associated with mortality or liver transplantation by week 24. Early reductions in HBV DNA of more than or equal to 2 log at 1 and 2 weeks were similar between the two groups. The biochemical and virological responses at 12, 24 and 48 weeks were also similar between the two groups. TDF and LAM for 24 weeks followed by TDF achieved a similar clinical outcome in CHB patients with SAE.
pharmacology & pharmacy,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?