Discourse Analysis of Job Interview Conversation: what and how to proceed in interaction

F. Jiang
Abstract:Job interview is widely used as gatekeeping in human resources selection and recruitment by companies and institutions, helping interviewer or employer concerned to judge and assess the competence and suitability of candidates. It has been believed that interviewee’ communicative skills, engaging expression of work desire and good display of stance and evaluation are not less important than information regarding candidate’s employable skills and work experience (Fox & Spector, 2000; Schuh, 1973). Consequently, as Prazak (1969) comments, it is not surprising that skilled interpersonal communication in the job interview setting may give the candidate an upper hand and a better chance to succeed in the interview. However, the importance of interpersonal interaction at job interview has been studied under such global and conceptual terms as communication strategies, which are not pedagogically desirable and concrete for both EFL teachers and students. Therefore, there is a need to take a linguistic turn to linguistically evidence how interpersonal and pragmatic meaning function in job interview conversation. This study is going to make discourse analysis of a video clip of job interview between a job applicant (interviewee) and the director (interviewer) of human resources department of Procter & Gamble Company. The analyses are based on appraisal system and generic structure (Martin & White, 2005) under Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and politeness theory and cooperative principles in pragmatics domain and the study sets out to make an analysis of the interpersonal and pragmatic meaning and force of interactive communication in job interview conversation. It endeavors to find out how attitudinal evaluation and generic structure help build solidarity between the interviewer and interviewee and how the interactants give respect to positive politeness considerations and cooperative principle. The findings are expected to offer us a better understanding of ontological discoursal features of a job interview and possible pedagogical implications.
Linguistics,Sociology,Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?