Antimicrobial efficacy of DJK‐5 peptide in combination with EDTA against biofilms in dentinal tubules: Primary irrigation, recovery and re‐irrigation

Mohamed Amhmed,He Liu,Lari Häkkinen,Markus Haapasalo,Ya Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14104
2024-06-07
International Endodontic Journal
Abstract:Aim To investigate the dynamic recovery of biofilms within dentinal tubules after primary irrigation with different protocols, and to evaluate the efficacy of various re‐irrigation protocols on recovered biofilm, considering factors such as smear layer, nutrient conditions, and primary irrigants. Methodology A total of 416 mono or multi‐species biofilms samples were prepared from human teeth and incubated for 3 weeks. After inducing a smear layer on half of the samples, all specimens were irrigated with one of the following irrigant sequences: (1) 6% NaOCl +17% EDTA, (2) 6% NaOCl +8.5% EDTA, (3) 6% NaOCl and (8.5% EDTA +10 μg/mL DJK‐5 antimicrobial peptide), or (4) sterile water. Thirty‐two samples were used to assess immediate effect, whilst the rest were re‐incubated to assess biofilms recovery. Nutrient conditions were defined based on whether culture media were changed (nutrient‐rich) or not (nutrient‐poor) during re‐incubation. After 16 weeks, recovered biofilms underwent re‐irrigation using four additional protocols, with or without DJK‐5 peptide, based on primary irrigants. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was employed to evaluate immediate irrigant effects, biofilms recovery intervals (1, 3, 5, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after primary irrigation), and re‐irrigation effects at the 16‐week. Statistical analysis included one‐way anova and two‐way mixed anova tests. Results The DJK‐5 peptide irrigation protocols demonstrated the highest killing rates during primary irrigation and resulted in a longer biofilms recovery time of 16 weeks compared to non‐peptide protocols (p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?