Multi-scale effects of behavioral movement deterrents on invasive carp metapopulations

Donald R. Schoolmaster,Aaron R. Cupp,Alison A. Coulter,Richard A. Erickson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03264-y
2024-04-17
Biological Invasions
Abstract:Behavioral deterrents of among-pool movement represent a promising tool for controlling invasive fish populations. To date, much of the research in this area has been focused on the direct effectiveness of different methods of deterrence. However, the effect of these structures on populations in spatially complex habitats is unknown. We combine a metacommunity model with movement data of two invasive species (bighead carp and silver carp) in a large river to assess local and river-wide scale population outcomes of deterrent locations. We calculated (1) which potential deterrent locations are most effective at reducing the growth at the invasion front (2) the river-scale population effects at each location, and (3) what, if any, are the risks imposed by altering the current spatial dynamics. We found that the effects on the population dynamics at the invasion front varied with the location of deterrents, ranging from near zero to effects equal to the reduction in an individual's movement across the deterrent. The river-scale population growth rate was slightly increased by all potential deterrent placements because the deterrents tended to concentrate more of the river-scale population into pools with the highest recruitment rates. The short-term, transient dynamics followed a strictly decreasing pattern after deterrent placement suggesting no additional short-term risk. These results suggest that deterrents can be an effective and low-risk intervention for the control of invasive carp, although the population level effect will depend on the interaction of the traits and behavior of the species with the physical character and spatial structure of the habitat.
biodiversity conservation,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the impact of behavioral movement deterrents in a multi-pool river system on the metapopulation dynamics of invasive carp (including bighead carp and silver carp). Specifically, the study focuses on the following questions: 1. **Determine the optimal deterrent locations**: Identify which potential behavioral deterrent locations are most effective in reducing population growth at the invasion front (e.g., Dresden Island). 2. **Evaluate whole-river scale effects**: Analyze the population effects at the whole-river scale after placing deterrents at each location, particularly whether these deterrents affect the population growth rate at the river scale or merely alter the spatial distribution of the population. 3. **Assess risks**: Investigate any potential risks associated with altering the current spatial dynamics, especially whether there are additional short-term risks. By combining a metapopulation model of the Illinois River with movement data of the two invasive species (bighead carp and silver carp) in the river, the research team evaluated the impact of different deterrent locations on local and whole-river scale population dynamics. The study found that the impact of deterrents on the population dynamics at the invasion front varied by location, ranging from almost no effect to significantly reducing the movement of individuals across the deterrents. However, the whole-river scale population growth rate slightly increased because the deterrents tended to concentrate more of the river-scale population in pools with the highest replenishment rates. The transient dynamics in the short term showed a strictly declining trend, indicating no additional short-term risks. Overall, the study suggests that behavioral deterrents can be an effective and low-risk means of controlling invasive carp, although the population-level effects depend on the interaction between species characteristics, behavior, and the physical and spatial structure of the habitat.