Abstract:Research on the association between rural households’ livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies has long been of interest in geography, management, economics, ecology and other disciplines. However, the existing micro-empirical studies are mostly small-scale surveys of rural households; there are much fewer large-scale investigations at the national level. Meanwhile, few empirical studies have analyzed the sensitivity of rural households’ livelihood strategies to various types of livelihood capitals in different types of villages, from the perspective of village type. This study uses survey data from 8031 rural households in 226 villages from 27 provinces (cities) of China; the villages were divided into three types: plain villages, hilly villages and mountainous villages. The livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies of rural households in different types of villages were examined, and ordinal logistic regression models were construed to explore the sensitivity of rural households’ livelihood strategies to various types of livelihood capitals in different types of villages. The results revealed that: (1) the sample of rural households had similar livelihood asset structures and livelihood strategy selections across the different types of villages. Among them, human capital was the most important livelihood asset for rural households, while rural households had the lowest dependence on natural capital; off-farm work was the main livelihood strategy for rural households, followed by on-farm work, while the proportion of households engaged in part-time work was the smallest. (2) Rural households’ livelihood strategies had different sensitivities to various types of livelihood capitals, and there were also differences in the sensitivities among different types of villages. For the total sample, as well as the hill and mountain village sub-samples, human and financial capitals had significant positive impacts on livelihood strategy, while nature and social capitals had significant negative impacts on livelihood strategy; physical capital had no significant impact on livelihood strategy. For the plain village sub-sample, human and physical capitals had significant positive impacts on livelihood strategy, while nature capital had a significant negative impact on livelihood strategy; financial and social capitals had no significant impacts on livelihood strategy. This study enhances our understanding of the characteristics of rural households’ livelihood capital structures and livelihood strategy selections as well as the sensitivity of rural households’ livelihood strategies to various types of livelihood capitals among different types of villages in China. These findings provide reference for the formulation of policies related to the improvement of rural households’ livelihoods in different types of villages.

How do livelihood capital affect farmers' energy-saving behaviors: Evidence from China

The Impact of Family Life Cycle on Farmers' Living Clean Energy Adoption Behavior-Based on 1382 Farmer Survey Data in Jiangxi Province

The impact of livelihood capital on sustainable livelihood capacity of farmers: evidence from Yunnan Province, China

Exploring the effects of livelihood capital on clean cooking of rural households in the Tibetan region of China

Sustainable land use in central China: the effects of different livelihood capital configurations on farmers' ecological production behaviors

Livelihood Capital, Ecological Cognition, and Farmers’ Green Production Behavior

Determinants of the Behavioral Lock-in of Rural Residents' Direct Biomass Energy Consumption in China

Influence of Livelihood Capital on Adaptation Strategies: Evidence from Rural Households in Wushen Banner, China

The Impact of Livelihood Capitals on Farmers' Adoption of Climate-smart Agriculture Practices: Evidence from Rice Production in the Jianghan Plain, China

Livelihood Capital and Land Transfer of Different Types of Farmers: Evidence from Panel Data in Sichuan Province, China

Effects of social capital on farmers’ choices of climate change adaptation behavior in Dazu District, China

Sensitivity of Livelihood Strategy to Livelihood Capital: an Empirical Investigation Using Nationally Representative Survey Data from Rural China

Gender differences in farmers’ livelihood capital in Dazu District, China

Impact of Livelihood Capital on the Adoption Behaviour of Integrated Agricultural Services among Farmers

Influence of livelihood capital on herdsmen's willingness to reduce the livestock in Inner Mongolia

Influence of Livelihood Capitals on Landscape Service Cognition and Behavioral Intentions in Rural Heritage Sites

Influence of social capital on the livelihood strategies of farmers under China’s rural revitalization strategy in poor mountain areas: A case study of the Liangshan Yi autonomous prefecture

Sensitivity of Rural Households’ Livelihood Strategies to Livelihood Capital in Poor Mountainous Areas: an Empirical Analysis in the Upper Reaches of the Min River, China

The Effect of Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs on the Relationship of Livelihood Capital and Livelihood Strategy among Rural Communities in Northwestern China

The differentiation characteristics of farmers' livelihood capital and their influences on the livelihood strategy in rapid urbanization area: A case study of Qingpu District of Shanghai

Does the Livelihood Capital of Rural Households in National Parks Affect Intentions to Participate in Conservation? A Model Based on an Expanded Theory of Planned Behavior