Abstract:As advances in medicine have progressed, the development of medical science faces the challenge of significant separation between basic medical research and medical clinical practice. As the bridge between medicine and science, physicians-scientists have a unique potential to combine clinical perspectives with scientific insights. They are defined as doctors with professional degrees who have training in clinical care and are engaged in independent biomedical research. Physician-scientists continue the great pace of recent biomedical research, translate scientific findings to clinical applications and play a vital role in promoting the development of medical science. Without supporting efforts of physician-scientists who have been systematically trained in medicine and science, pressing challenges cannot be met at the forefront of biomedicine. Given the importance of developing the physician-scientist workforce, well-known MD-PhD training programs started in the 1950s. These programs expanded significantly when the Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) was launched in 1964 by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) at the National Institutes of Health. MSTP has supported over 10000 students who have successfully trained outstanding biomedical scientists and top talents for the United States. In China, the era of health promotion driven by innovation is upon us, and a large number of physician-scientists are needed to meet the development of medical science. Some practices provide preliminary exploration for training physician-scientists, such as MD-PhD programs supported by famous medical schools and the inception of a research hospital. However, physician-scientists have become an “endangered species”. It has been reported that physician-scientists are less likely to play a major role in biomedical research than they were in the past in the United States. This article examines the barriers of physician-scientists with regard to participation in clinical research, such as physician-, research subject-, and institution- and research hospital-related barriers. The future viability and vitality of the physician-scientist workforce pose unique challenges. To encourage physician-scientist participation, strategies are proposed to provide a new path for cultivating excellent physician-scientists. These strategies include proper understanding of the role of physician-scientists in medical innovation, scientific training systems at critical stages of career development, adequate research support from institutions and hospitals, reasonable evaluation and incentive systems, encouraging innovative academic culture, and personal active participation and effort. The great potential of translating scientific achievements into clinical practice and the complex challenges facing the development of medical science suggest the importance and necessity of physician-scientists. A variety of potential approaches should be taken to ensure physicians-scientists’ participation in clinical trials and basic research as well as the sustainable development of the physician-scientist team.

Challenges for trainee physician–scientists during their PhD candidature: a cross‐sectional study

What will it take? Pathways, time and funding: Australian medical students' perspective on clinician-scientist training

Exploring intentions of physician-scientist trainees: factors influencing MD and MD/PhD interest in research careers

"Luck of the draw really": a qualitative exploration of Australian trainee doctors' experiences of mandatory research

Transitions in general practice training: quantifying epidemiological variation in trainees’ experiences and clinical behaviours

Research training during radiology residency: findings from the ESR Radiology Trainee Forum survey

To Train the Qualified Physician-Scientists

Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature

The first nationwide survey of MD-PhDs in the social sciences and humanities: training patterns and career choices

Institutional Training Opportunities for PhD Students in Laboratory Medicine: An Unmet Career Development Need?

Perspectives on Academic Training in Clinical Oncology in the United Kingdom: A National Cross-Sectional Analysis

Graduate education in the biomedical sciences: critical observations on training for research careers

Less than full-time training, barriers and future needs. A UK-wide online survey of doctors in training

Profile of Sport and Exercise Physician trainee's clinical practice within Australasia in 2019: a cross-sectional study

Clinical scientists’ early career choices and progression: an exploratory mixed methods study

A qualitative investigation into perceptions of scientist-practitioner competence within supervision during psychology training programmes

The Art and Science of Securing an Anaesthesiology Training Job: A Survey of the Key Factors in Two Australian Tertiary Hospitals

The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective

Australian surgeon attitudes and experiences towards completing a higher degree by research

A mixed methods analysis of experiences and expectations among early-career medical oncologists in Australia

Transitioning From Trainee to Practicing Pathologist: A Prospective Multi-institutional Survey of the Challenges Early Career Anatomic Pathologists Encounter When Entering Independent Practice