Taxation as an instrument of stimulation of innovation-active business entities

Andrey Nechaev

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.2746

2014-12-07

ECONOMICS

Abstract:The analysis of the theoretical material revealed the lack of consensus on defini-tion of the tax stimulation of innovation-active business entities within the re-gional taxation. The definition tax stimulation of innovation-active business en-tities is specified.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Stimulating innovation in Russia: Limitations and opportunities of tax policy

Т. A. Loginova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-4-116-132

2022-04-08

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Abstract:The purpose of the study is to identify institutional and regulatory restrictions and the possibilities of using instruments of tax policy in Russia to stimulate innovative activity of enterprises. The article examines the importance of institutional constraints and factors of innovative development. The factor of international tax competition in the sphere of innovation is investigated, and the data of international trade in innovative services are analyzed. Based on the data of tax and statistical reports in Russia and data from the financial statements of the largest Russian companies, the analysis of the actual demand for key instruments of tax regulation of R&D in Russia has been carried out. It is concluded that there are shortcomings that do not allow to fully use the potential of existing measures on income tax to stimulate innovative activity. Among the main shortcomings we identify: the lack of focus, complex regulation and administration, a limited scope of the applied incentives to R&D on corporate income tax. This makes the current tax incentives inaccessible to a wide range of taxpayers and leads to an outflow of resources from Russia to foreign countries with better regulatory conditions.
Corporate Income Tax Preferences as a Tool to Stimulate Innovation

Valentina Mikhailovna Avdeeva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065x.2023.1.39552

2023-01-01

Налоги и налогообложение

Abstract:The level of economic growth in Russia at the moment is largely determined by such factors as the number of scientific achievements and the general level of technology development in the country. The Russian Federation does not lag behind in terms of scientific and technological achievements, and it can be said with confidence that at the moment the country has a sufficient number of innovative developments. However, among the weaknesses it should be noted the sector of tax incentives for innovation, which in Russia is developing at a relatively slow pace. In this regard, the purpose of this study is to identify and develop practical recommendations on the issue of stimulating innovation through the application of corporate income tax preferences. The subject of the study is corporate income tax preferences as one of the tools to encourage organizations to invest in innovation and digital development. The main conclusion of the study is that corporate income tax preferences currently do not play such a significant role in stimulating innovative organizations and innovative projects. In order to increase the effectiveness of stimulating innovative enterprises with the help of income tax preferences, it is necessary to pay attention to the problematic aspects indicated in the article, which are often the cause of tax disputes. In addition, this article indicates possible directions for solving these problematic issues, which in the future can generally improve the state of the tax system of the Russian Federation.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tax Incentives in Order to Create a Modern Tax Mechanism Innovation Development

U.A. Rumina,A.S. Balandina,K.A. Bannova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.502

2015-01-01

Abstract:This article examines the current state of the system of tax incentives in the Russian Federation (RF), aimed at promoting innovation. It is noted that over the past five years, the significant changes have been introduced into the Tax Code of the Russian Federation (the Tax Code) to stimulate innovation. However, so far, the efforts of the State have not given any tangible results, and the system of tax incentives is still not self-sufficient and effective for controlling of the innovation process. At the moment, the measures in the main lines of the tax policy of the Russian Federation for 2014 and for the planning period of 2015 and 2016 are less diverse than those, realized in the previous period, since the efficiency level on innovation is not quite known. The main emphasis, now, is put on the monitoring program of tax benefits as the existing problem of low efficiency is recognized by all levels of government, and the particular changes in the system of tax incentives for innovation can not solve it by themselves. The authors analyze the advantages and disadvantages of existing tax benefits from the viewpoints of both business entities and the state. The necessity and possibility of evaluation of the effectiveness of tax incentives is considered, and, in this regard, it is proposed to develop a system of evaluation criteria allowing, firstly, the assessment of the degree of relief influence on the tax burden of business entities, engaged in innovative activities, and, secondly, determination of the benefits influence on the level of budget revenues.

English Else
Tax regulation of enterprise R&D expenditures: special aspects and problems of regulation

T. A. Loginova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(1).111-123

2022-03-24

Law Enforcement Review

Abstract:The subject of the research is a corporate income tax regime of tax accounting of intangible assets and R&D spending. The working hypothesis is that realization of the regulative potential of tax policy in relation to stimulating R&D activity and creation of intangibles assets shall be streamlined and adapted to increase the effectiveness of innovations. Authors suggest that the key tax policy goal of the mechanism is the widening of the volumes of commercialized R&D results and intangibles, lowering the tax risks, and increasing the legal certainty. The aim of this research is formulation of tax policy proposals for subsequent reforming this mechanism of direct taxation of transactions related with R&D. To achieve the aim of the research the following research approach was employed by the authors. As a first step authors present a literature review on the issue. As a second step authors are performing the analysis of current rules related to tax accounting of R&D costs and intangibles in accordance with Tax Code of Russian Federation. As a third step authors delineate the barriers and legal obstacles in the performance of tax incentives for R&D by reviewing the judicial cases and analytical reports on the issue. Finally, authors formulate their tax policy proposals for the subsequent tax reforms in relation to tax accounting of R&D. The results and the scope of the study . Author’s working hypothesis is based on the idea that the effective application of tax policy instruments can contribute to success of the jurisdiction in winning in global tax competition game. This is particularly important in context of digitalization and for attracting investments and parts of activities of multinational enterprises to the territory of the state. Intangible assets and key people which coordinate the processes of the creation of intangibles can be regarded as the crucial value-added factors in the modern economy where technological MNEs are increasingly dominating. Countries compete internationally for these talented people and favorable and certain tax regime can positively impact on MNE decisions to make a profit center in any jurisdiction, while tax uncertainty can negatively impact this decision. Conclusions. One of the key results of this research is that R&D tax incentives in Russia remain rather unpopular instrument in corporate practice. Authors explain this with the existing legal barriers and legal uncertainty. This uncertainty leads to tax risks for taxpayers which impacts their decisions for using the incentives. Review of judicial cases related to tax accounting of R&D costs when calculating corporate income tax base showed that there are many different areas of disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities. It is important to note that some of this uncertainty is already addressed in recent amendments to Article 262 of Tax Code. Authors propose to reduce uncertainty by extending the scope of R&D tax incentives to all types of R&D activity. The goal of the research is therefore can be considered as achieved.
Tax Incentives for R&D and Innovation: Demand versus Effects

Leonid Gokhberg,Galina Kitova,Vitaliy Roud,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2014.3.18.41

2014-09-01

Abstract:Tax incentives have proven to be an efficient tool of state support for science, technology and innovation, and are used by many countries on their way towards sustainable development and enhancing global competitiveness. Fiscal stimuli are increasingly combined in a more flexible manner, thus contributing to attaining wider spectrum of objectives; means of international comparison and evaluating impact of these tools are actively evolving. However, despite the fact that for many countries the tax incentives are demandable and work effectively, Russia's situation is different.Based on the results of a specialized survey, the paper estimates the demand for R&D tax breaks from Russian manufacturing enterprises, research organizations and universities performing R&D. The study demonstrated that such a demand is generally low for all types of surveyed organizations, probably due to both the imperfection of the Russian tax legislation, which makes the considered tool inefficient, and low share of the organizations engaged in R&D and innovation. Among the most frequently noted demotivating factors were mismatch of organization’s activity to the terms of using a specific tax break, as well as unwarranted costs associated with the need to prove the right to use these breaks. When using a specific tax incentive, the research institutions typically seek exemption from VAT for R&D activities and patent licensing operations, as well as benefit to mainstream targeted grants. Universities engaged in R&D are more likely to turn to the benefits for grants and accelerated depreciation of fixed assets used for scientific and technological activities.The analysis showed that in Russia the public sector dominates among all categories of recipients of tax incentives for research and innovation. This situation is contrary to best practices and global trends in supporting research activities, which involve betting on strong national players (including startups and SMEs). It hardly allows STI tax incentives to be an efficient mean and provides a basis for the revision and optimization of these tools. This paper indicates possible further directions in the studying tax incentives, their classification, performance assessment and optimization to meet best practices, global trends, and the forefront of research in this area.
Corporate income tax as a Tool for regulating the Russian Economy

Н.Д. Стеба

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34925/eip.2022.147.10.055

2023-02-21

Экономика и предпринимательство

Abstract:В статье проведен анализ показателей взимания налога на прибыль организаций в РФ и Оренбургской области, сделаны соответствующие выводы о причинах отклонения в динамике. Проведенный анализ позволил определить роль налога на прибыль организаций в регулировании экономики России, сформулировать предложения по повышению значимости налога в ее инвестиционном характере развитии. Результаты исследования представляют практическую значимость при определении направлений развития налогообложения прибыли организаций в целях стимулирования инвестиционной направленности экономики России. The article analyzes the indicators of corporate income tax collection in the Russian Federation and the Orenburg region, and makes appropriate conclusions about the reasons for the deviation in dynamics. The analysis made it possible to determine the role of corporate income tax in regulating the Russian economy, formulate proposals to increase the importance of the tax in its investment character development. The results of the study are of practical importance in determining the directions of development of corporate profit taxation in order to stimulate the investment orientation of the Russian economy.
Tax Incentives in the System of State Financial Support of Economic Entities

Larysa Sidelnykova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4.2022.31

2022-09-25

Economic Affairs

Abstract:In crisis conditions of economic development, it is the state’s assistance to economic entities that can improve the economic situation both in the regions and in the country as a whole. The taxation system of business entities should simultaneously stimulate business development and further fill the state and local budgets at the expense of tax revenues. Tax incentives are one of the leading elements of tax policy, which in turn pursue social and economic goals. The research aims to analyze the impact of tax incentives on business entities’ functioning and develop options that improve their efficiency and competitiveness. A detailed and comprehensive analysis of the best foreign practices allowed the authors to propose a mechanism for tax incentives in the system of state financial support for business entities. The authors also provided more detailed recommendations regarding individual instruments of state tax incentives and highlighted the most important practical aspects. The proposed recommendations can contribute to the development of business and the growth of innovative activity of economic entities, which will improve the economic situation in the regions and social progress in general through filling the state and local budgets with tax revenues.

English Else
TAX INCENTIVE SYSTEM FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY: STATE AND PROSPECTS

Nataliia Havrilenko,Olena Hryshchenko,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/171-13

2021-01-01

Economic scope

Abstract:The article examines the mechanisms of tax incentives for innovation of economic entities, which should focus on the development of national production and ensure sustainable macroeconomic growth. It was found that the main problems of the domestic economy, which create barriers to its innovative renewal, are the weak links between science and industry, lack of demand from industry and research and development, very low level of technical equipment of the economy, lack of market motivation for the development of knowledge-intensive production, worn-out equipment and, as a result, low efficiency of the economy as a whole. It is proved that among the main reasons for the reduction of budget revenues in the economy of Ukraine, in addition to the crisis, there are also tax benefits. For certain areas of business, this is one of the most attractive types of government support, as it means that some businesses are starting to pay less taxes. The rest, respectively, must be paid by other business structures or the state receives less money to finance its expenditures. As a result, inequality between taxpayers and a simultaneous reduction in the amount of funds that can be collected by the Ministry of Finance. Thus, in 2019 alone, due to the provision of tax benefits, the state budget did not receive budget revenues equivalent to 1.3 billion US dollars. Total budget losses from this source during 2015-2019 amounted to 6.4 billion dollars. It was found that in Ukraine there is almost no system for monitoring the impact of tax benefits, and this does not allow to assess the future effect of the introduction of such measures. Of course, this has important negative consequences for both public finances and the economy as a whole. The influence of granting tax benefits on the loss of state budget revenues is analyzed. Specific measures aimed at tax incentives for the development of innovation in Ukraine, the introduction of innovations by economic entities of all sizes are proposed. The need to rethink the criteria for granting tax benefits is noted. Foreign practice of tax incentives for innovation and investment activities, the cost of innovation is time-tested and quite diverse. Undoubtedly, it can be useful in the development of this area of tax incentives in Ukraine.
IMPROVEMENT OF TAXATION TO STRENGTHEN THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ENTERPRISES

Людмила ХОМЕНКО

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2024-328-54

2024-04-25

Abstract:One of the leading tax incentives that the state can provide to industrial enterprises in difficult times to improve their business efficiency is a full or partial waiver of profit taxation, namely a portion of tax revenues to the budget. At the same time, the provision of even targeted tax incentives sets a precedent for their effective use. The process of reproduction to stabilize the equilibrium of the current stage requires a transition to a new level of economic relations, including the use of the tax regulation mechanism. Approaches to the use of the tax regulation mechanism are outlined in relation to: investment tax credit, as from the timing of tax payments in the part of expenses from profit on innovation; tax holidays for the payment of tax on income obtained from the implementation of innovative projects within the term of several years; reduction of the tax on the growth of innovation expenses; preferential taxation of profit obtained through the use of intellectual property. The necessity to track the usage of the received benefits in the form of a tax credit for the innovative development of industrial production in the conditions of accelerated implementation of the achievements of scientific and technical progress is justified. A conclusion was made regarding the provision of tax benefits for innovative investment projects based on compliance with established special criteria regarding investment volumes, their compliance with priority areas of investment activity and expected socio-economic results. In order to provide such a benefit, a reasonable step is to keep a separate record of the results of the implementation of the investment project and related expenses. A special adjustment of the value of assets for compensation of the underestimation of real depreciation in inflationary conditions in case of introduction of innovations is detailed. Using Tereshchenko's model, the probability of bankruptcy of an investment-innovative steel factory was calculated. It is proposed to create an anti-crisis headquarters consisting of a group of specialists in the main areas, including a financial specialist for substantiating calculations for obtaining a tax credit for future innovative improvements.
DIRECTIONS OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE TAX COMPONENT OF THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE

L.S. SHATALOVA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2021.23.3(80).379-390

2021-08-20

Economic innovations

Abstract:Topicality. The question of how to stimulate innovation processes in the Ukrainian economy is natural. On the one hand, budget opportunities in our country at this stage of development are very limited, on the other hand,  objective pattern is the reduction of state involvement in innovation as we approach the stage of commercialization in the life cycle of innovation. In this regard, when building an effective model of innovation development and state innovation policy, the focus should not be on direct budget financing, but on indirect methods that correspond to the essence of a market economy and competition, are more predictable and transparent for business entities. relatively lower administrative costs, help reduce the impact of the corruption component. The traditional tool of indirect methods of state regulation of innovation processes is tax regulation, the definition of directions of transformation of which are the most relevant for the development of the market of innovative technologies.Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to identify problems and areas for improving the tax component of the business environment for the development of the market of innovative technologies in Ukraine.Research results. The main trends in the use of tax instruments to stimulate research and development (R&D) by economically successful countries are identified. The global trends in the distribution of tax benefits for R&D depending on the size and type of economic activity of business entities are presented. The main problems that hinder the development of the market of innovative technologies in Ukraine are identified. Based on a comparative analysis of the structural elements of the price of products manufactured using traditional and innovative technologies, the prevalence in the structure of the price of products manufactured using innovative technologies, the newly created value is identified. It is proposed to reduce the tax burden on the social security contributions and profits of businesses that implement innovative technologies by reducing the rate of single social contribution to the payroll of employees who implement innovative technologies, to establish an investment tax credit and the tax regime of the Patent Box. The comparative characteristics of the volume and incremental schemes of investment tax credit are presented and the expediency of introduction of the volume scheme of investment tax credit in Ukraine is substantiated, which will stimulate the increase of qualified expenses of entrepreneurs for R&D.Conclusion. The tax instruments that will help reduce the tax burden on entrepreneurs, who implement innovative technologies, are described in this article. The introduction of tax incentives will help reduce the costs of entrepreneurs until they make a profit, will stimulate the reinvestment of profits in new innovative technologies and patent activity of business entities.

English Else
MODERN PROBLEMS OF TAXATION OF LEGAL ENTITIES AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES OF TAX REGULATION

Avazkhon Agzamov,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/18881

2024-06-30

International Journal of Advanced Research

Abstract:This study analyzes the current taxation system in Russia, reveals the main sources of tax revenue to the countrys budget, lists successful projects of the Federal Tax Service of Russia, implemented recently and bringing additional profit to the consolidated budget. At the same time, the author also identifies the basic shortcomings and shortcomings in the modern taxation system in Russia, separately noting the fact that in Russia accruals differ significantly from revenues, and therefore there is an increase in economic crimes in the country. In addition, this work notes the need to develop measures aimed at minimizing taxes for small and medium-sized businesses or switching to a single tax with exemption from it for newly created organizations for the first three years. In the article, the author notes the need to create a simplified taxation system not only for small and medium-sized businesses, in particular at the regional level, but also for the entire population of the country. At the end of the study, conclusions and a number of recommendations are provided aimed at improving the effectiveness of the implementation of the main functions of the taxes studied here.
Taxation Instruments for the Support of Research and Advanced Development Expenses in the Manufacturing Sector of the Economy

R G Akhmadeev,O A Bykanova

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/666/6/062140

2021-03-01

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

Abstract:Abstract The goal of this research is studying the results achieved by using the existing taxation instruments regulating the creation of R&D expenses during the profits tax calculation and payment in the manufacturing sector of the economy of the Russian Federation. The main methods of this research are the analysis and the generalization of regulatory documents, as well as the mathematical representation based on the extrapolation of empiric data on the structure of R&D expenses incurred within 2012-2018 on the profit tax base. In terms of expense tracking, Russian tax legislation prescribes complicated procedures for R&D expenses accounting taking into consideration such limitation as using a minimum of 75% of the labor costs. The mechanism of fiscal expansion for the innovative activities in terms of R&D is separate from the methods of innovation process implementation, including the product life cycle phases and innovation process stages. Due to this, it is important to treat manufacturing enterprises as a separate category, because their operations are innovation-active. In practice, we suggest expanding the existing list of innovative activities in strategic areas of the country’s economic safety in order to increase the rates of high-end technology introduction in manufacturing.
Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development

Christof Ernst,Katharina Richter,Nadine Riedel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-014-9315-2

2014-05-04

International Tax and Public Finance

Abstract:This paper examines the impact of tax incentives on corporate research and development (R&D) activity. R&D tax incentives are commonly provided as special tax allowances or tax credits. In recent years, several countries also reduced their income tax rates on R&D output with the purpose to foster R&D activity. Previous papers have shown that all three tax instruments are effective in raising the quantity of R&D related activity. We in turn assess the impact of corporate tax incentives on the quality of R&D projects, i.e., their innovativeness and earnings potential. Using rich data on corporate patent applications to the European patent office, we find that a low tax rate on patent income raises the average profitability and innovation level of the projects undertaken in a country. The effect is statistically significant and economically relevant and prevails in a number of sensitivity checks. Generous R&D tax credits and tax allowances are in contrast found to exert a negative impact on project quality.

economics
FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF STATE SUPPORT OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES (MACRO- AND MICROECONOMIC ASPECTS)

Nina Yarovа,Olha Vorkunova,Vira Baryshnikova,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31375/2226-1915-2023-2-05-18

2023-01-01

Development of Management and Entrepreneurship Methods on Transport (ONMU)

Abstract:The foreign experience of state support for innovative activities of enterprises at both the macro and micro levels is discussed in the article.An important condition for the dynamic development of the country at the macro level is the accelerated introduction of modern innovative technologies in the economic, social and other spheres with the wide use of the achievements of science and technology.All rapidly developing spheres of public and state life of the country require close support of the reforms on the basis of modern innovative ideas, developments and technologies that ensure a quick and high-quality breakthrough of the country in this area of activity.State regulation of the economy and innovation processes on the macro level,according to scientists, is one of the main conditions for transferring the functioning of the economy to market relations. The main function of the state in the conditions of market relations is the protection of individual freedom, property and entrepreneurship. The government is obliged to work with the market in one harness.To overcome the crisis on the macro level, it is necessary to develop a strategy for maintaining and developing the scientific, technical and innovative potential of the country in the following areas: restructuring the scientific and technical potential in various sectors of the economy, taking into account the concentration of material, financial and intellectual resources; creation of a science and innovation property fund; development of a system for the use of leasing as an effective market mechanism for subjects of innovative activity; improving the mechanisms of the system for attracting bank loans to expand innovation and create conditions for the development of the capital market; creation in financial and industrial groups along with the system of consolidation of financial and production potentials of special innovation centers coordinating and implementing innovative projects; formation of an institute of developers of innovative projects from among scientific and technical workers, scientists and specialists; formation on the basis of funds supporting innovative activity, associations of funds with developed financial capital to help innovative projects; formation of a system for the targeted use of depreciation fund funds to finance activities related to R&D, experimental and other types of work, development of innovations, patenting of new solutions; improvements in tax legislation, which will increase innovation activity.In recent years, in the economically developed countries of the world, there has been a trend towards the widespread use of indirect stimulation methods on a par with direct ones. This is due to the fact that tax benefits involve much less intervention by the state in the economic life of an enterprise and they encourage already embodied actions, while subsidies only those that have yet to be implemented.An important role on the macro and micro level is played by tax incentives, which are used to develop the activities of enterprises that are aimed at stimulating scientific and technological progress and innovation.Some foreign countries use both types of tax discounts at the same time – both volumetric and incremental, but in relation to different types of expenses:in the USA, for private sector expenditures on fundamental research funding, the general incremental discount was supplemented by a volume discount of 20%;in France, newly established small and medium-sized companies are temporarily exempted from paying income tax or have a «tax holiday» with a reduction of 50% of the income tax they pay for the first five years of their activity;in Great Britain, the tax for innovative startups has been reduced from 20%to 1%.The experience of the USA, where the state encourages the interaction of enterprises and higher education institutions in the field of scientific and research work by providing tax benefits, should be used in Ukraine.Businesses provide necessary equipment to universities free of charge and are able to deduct the cost of this equipment from their gross income. This will make it possible to create powerful research centers on the basis of higher educational institutions of the country.In France, the state encourages personnel training:25% of the increase in personnel training costs are exempt from taxes;personnel training costs are not taxed at all if there is high unemployment.One of the methods that has the greatest value as a benefit is the accelerated depreciation method:in Germany, accelerated depreciation is applied in agriculture (up to 50% of the cost of equipment is written off in the first year, up to 80% in the first three years).Among the indirect economic measures of state regulation of innovative activity in the EU countries is the policy of industrial protectionism for the protection and implementation of innovations in the country.Keywords: state support, micro-macroeconomic aspect, innovation activity, strategy, world economy.

English Else
Features and Problems of Tax Incentives for Small Software Companies in Russia

Vladimir V. Gromov,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2022-1-8-25

2022-02-01

Financial Journal

Abstract:Since 2021, Russian IT companies have been stimulated by enhanced tax incentives, which allow one to pay corporate income tax only to the federal budget as well as pay social security contributions at a heavily reduced rate. While medium and large businesses get benefits from the new government support, small enterprises are traditionally supported through the simplified taxation system, which offers alternative tax measures. For this reason, the purpose of the article is to identify problems which could arise when new incentives are distributed in the economy. Based on the structure of the IT industry and the conditions of reducing taxes, it is argued that fairness of taxation is broken as small IT (software) companies constitute the majority and, at the same time, have little chance to be included in the tax incentive scope. The new privileges addressed to IT companies actually favor some businesses with high turnovers, and even the favorable simplified taxation system cannot completely eliminate distortions in the tax burden level. Along with this, sub-central governments have a strong motivation to raise their tax revenues within the framework of vertical tax competition. There is a need to make the tax system more neutral as well to harmonize tax regimes, and the article provides relevant proposals.
Tax policy for business entities under the conditions of association with the European Union: features and optimization directions

George Abuselidze,Inga Gogitidze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613013

2020-01-01

E3S Web of Conferences

Abstract:Under the conditions of EU association, one of the important for Georgia is to create such tax policy that shall be agreeable and settled with the economic systems of developed countries. The efficiency of the tax system depends on the optimal tax policy, according to which highly available and modern standard-oriented business environment is created. In 2017, the Parliament of Georgia passed the reform of profit tax that is aimed to free the business entities from profit tax during the reinvestment process. All the above mentioned maintains the topicality of ongoing reforms in Georgia. The goal of the research is to identify the impact of the new tax system on the Gross Domestic Product, the stream of investments, stimulation of business, and the period, after which the results of the reform will be favourable for the economic. There are various researches and scientific publications on the given issue. According to the study, the reform will produce a long-term macroeconomic effect that will mainly aim to favour small and middle scale businesses. Liberal tax approaches are advancing Georgia’s investment attractiveness, reflecting an increase of investments. This work is based on Estonian experience presented in statistics and international studies. The information processed by experts and researchers helps us to evaluate the impact of this reform on Georgia.

English Else
The system of tax incentives in regional tax policy

Andrey Glotko,Gennady Lyaskin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112801010

2021-01-01

SHS Web of Conferences

Abstract:The article analyzes the problem of optimization of tax benefits in formation of tax policy at the regional level. The application of a systematic approach in improving the regional tax regime has been substantiated. The content and functions of tax benefits have been determined. The classification of tax incentives is presented. The characteristic of the tax policy of the Altai Republic is given on the basis of the recommendations of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. The structure and dynamics of tax expenditures in the budget of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation are analyzed. The orientation of the tax policy of the Altai Republic towards improving regional legislation with the continuation of the course towards creating favorable conditions for development of entrepreneurship and stimulating the investment attractiveness of the region is revealed. A number of offers for improving the tax policy of the Altai Republic in terms of optimizing the system of tax incentives have been substantiated.
Analysis of foreign practice of tax incentives for the development of high-tech industry

Semyon Borisovich Razu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065x.2024.3.70683

2024-03-01

Налоги и налогообложение

Abstract:The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budget funds under the state assignment of the Financial University. The subject of the study is specific measures in the field of tax regulation of industrial development by the leading industrial powers of the world. The purpose of the work is to explore the use of tax instruments to influence the manufacturing sector of various countries and the areas of their application, considering their evolution and development. The result of the work is the identification of the most promising methods of tax incentives for high-tech industry enterprises, which in the future can be introduced into taxation practice in the Russian Federation in order to stimulate the achievement of the country's technological sovereignty. The main methods used in this study are comparison, classification, statistical and retrospective analysis, as well as economic and mathematical calculations. The result of the work is the identification of the most promising methods of tax incentives for high-tech industry enterprises. The novelty of the study lies in the systematization of tax mechanisms for high-tech industry in industrialized countries, general trends in the development of such mechanisms, as well as justifying the feasibility of using their experience in the Russian Federation. In addition, the novelty lies in making proposals for the adaptation and modification of these mechanisms to Russian economy. The scope of the work is the tax system of the Russian Federation. The main conclusions are the identification among the analyzed instruments the most suitable ones for our country in the current conditions, which in the future can have a stimulating effect on the formation of the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation, as well as calculation of the potential tax benefits for high-tech industry enterprises.
VALID TAX LIABILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS ON INCOME TAX. ISSUES OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

Andrei V. Il’in,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6304-2023-4-100-125

2023-01-01

Abstract:The subject of the study is the mechanism used by tax authorities to charge income tax to organizations. The relevance of the study is due to the systematic incomplete accounting by the tax authorities in the implementation of tax control of expenses incurred by organizations that overestimate their financial results, leading to the economically unjustified and excessively high direct taxation in all types of economic activity. The purpose of the study is to form a direction for improving the mechanism for calculating corporate income tax used by tax authorities in the implementation of tax control and changing tax practices. The study used an analysis of the legal and regulatory framework, tax practice and economic publications on the mechanism of calculating corporate income tax by tax authorities. The result of the study is the conclusion that in the Russian tax systemwhen exercising tax control there is a constant presence of incomplete accounting by tax authorities of expenses incurred by organizations. Such an approach on the part of the state entails an artificial overestimation of profits and economically unjustified excessively high direct taxation. The practice of tax control contradicts the theory of taxation, the conclusions made in economics, the name and economic essence of the income tax. Changes in the practice of profit taxation should exclude arbitrary manipulation with expenses of organizations for tax authorities. The conclusion is made about the need to change the practice of taxation, the importance of the formation by the tax authorities of the actual tax obligations of organizations for income tax based on the actual profit received using the calculation method for the full determination and accounting of all expenses incurred by the taxpayer
Taxation and Innovation in the 20th Century

Ufuk Akcigit,John Grigsby,Tom Nicholas,Stefanie Stantcheva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3250767

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper studies the effect of corporate and personal taxes on innovation in the United States over the twentieth century. We use three new datasets: a panel of the universe of inventors who patent since 1920; a dataset of the employment, location and patents of firms active in R&D since 1921; and a historical state-level corporate tax database since 1900, which we link to an existing database on state-level personal income taxes. Our analysis focuses on the impact of taxes on individual inventors and firms (the micro level) and on states over time (the macro level). We propose several identification strategies, all of which yield consistent results: i) OLS with fixed effects, including inventor and state-times-year fixed effects, which make use of differences between tax brackets within a state-year cell and which absorb heterogeneity and contemporaneous changes in economic conditions; ii) an instrumental variable approach, which predicts changes in an individual or firm’s total tax rate with changes in the federal tax rate only; iii) a border county strategy, which exploits tax variation across neighboring counties in different states. We find that taxes matter for innovation: higher personal and corporate income taxes negatively affect the quantity, quality, and location of inventive activity at the macro and micro levels. At the macro level, cross-state spillovers or business-stealing from one state to another are important, but do not account for all of the effect. Agglomeration effects from local innovation clusters tend to weaken responsiveness to taxation. Corporate inventors respond more strongly to taxes than their non-corporate counterparts.

Taxation as an instrument of stimulation of innovation-active business entities

Stimulating innovation in Russia: Limitations and opportunities of tax policy

Corporate Income Tax Preferences as a Tool to Stimulate Innovation

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tax Incentives in Order to Create a Modern Tax Mechanism Innovation Development

Tax regulation of enterprise R&D expenditures: special aspects and problems of regulation

Tax Incentives for R&D and Innovation: Demand versus Effects

Corporate income tax as a Tool for regulating the Russian Economy

Tax Incentives in the System of State Financial Support of Economic Entities

TAX INCENTIVE SYSTEM FOR INNOVATIVE ACTIVITY: STATE AND PROSPECTS

IMPROVEMENT OF TAXATION TO STRENGTHEN THE FINANCIAL STABILITY OF ENTERPRISES

DIRECTIONS OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE TAX COMPONENT OF THE ENTREPRENEURIAL ENVIRONMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARKET OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE

MODERN PROBLEMS OF TAXATION OF LEGAL ENTITIES AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES OF TAX REGULATION

Taxation Instruments for the Support of Research and Advanced Development Expenses in the Manufacturing Sector of the Economy

Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development

FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF STATE SUPPORT OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES (MACRO- AND MICROECONOMIC ASPECTS)

Features and Problems of Tax Incentives for Small Software Companies in Russia

Tax policy for business entities under the conditions of association with the European Union: features and optimization directions

The system of tax incentives in regional tax policy

Analysis of foreign practice of tax incentives for the development of high-tech industry

VALID TAX LIABILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS ON INCOME TAX. ISSUES OF THEORY AND PRACTICE

Taxation and Innovation in the 20th Century