Abstract:Abnormality of fear memory is one of the important pathogenic factors leading to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorder, and other mental disorders. Clinically, although exposure therapy, which is based on the principle of fear memory extinction, has a certain effect on these diseases, it still relapses frequently in some cases. These troubles can be effectively solved by retrieving the memory in a certain time window before the extinction of fear memory. Therefore, it is generally believed that the extinction of fear memory is the result of forming new safe memory to competitively inhibit the original fear memory, while the retrieval-extinction operation is the updating or erasure of the original fear memory, thus, which has greater clinical therapeutic potential. However, what are the detailed molecular networks, specifically the circular RNAs (circRNAs), involved in fear memory updating, and the differences with fear extinction, are still unknown. In this study, we systematically observed the expression of mRNAs, microRNAs (miRNA), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circRNAs in the basolateral amygdala of mice after fear memory formation, extinction, and updating by whole-transcriptional sequencing, then a variety of inter-group comparison and bioinformatics analysis were used to find the differential expressed RNAs, enrich the function of them, and construct the molecular interaction networks. Moreover, competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) molecular networks and transcriptional regulatory networks for the candidate circRNAs were constructed. Through these analyses, we found that about 10% of molecules were both involved in the fear memory extinction and formation, but the molecules and their signaling pathways were almost completely different between fear memory extinction and updating. This study describes a relatively detailed molecular network for fear memory updating, which might provide some novel directions for further mechanism research, and help to develop a specific physical method for fear memory intervention, based on the regulation of these key molecules.

Altered fear engram encoding underlying conditioned versus unconditioned stimulus–initiated memory updating

Distinct engrams control fear and extinction memory

Engrams of Fear Memory Attenuation

Identification of the Similarities and Differences of Molecular Networks Associated With Fear Memory Formation, Extinction, and Updating in the Amygdala

Memory Trace for Fear Extinction: Fragile yet Reinforceable

Hippocampus and amygdala fear memory engrams re-emerge after contextual fear relapse

An Unconditioned Stimulus Retrieval Extinction Procedure to Prevent the Return of Fear Memory.

Distinct hippocampal engrams control extinction and relapse of fear memory

Amygdala Reward Neurons Form and Store Fear Extinction Memory

Extinction Training Suppresses Activity of Fear Memory Ensembles Across the Hippocampus and Alters Transcriptomes of Fear-Encoding Cells

Dynamic tripartite construct of interregional engram circuits underlies forgetting of extinction memory

Synaptic Encoding of Fear Extinction in mPFC-amygdala Circuits

Anterior basolateral amygdala neurons comprise a remote fear memory engram

Memory reconsolidation and extinction of fear conditioning induced different Arc/Arg3.1 expression

Predicting Aversive Events And Terminating Fear In The Mouse Anterior Cingulate Cortex During Trace Fear Conditioning

Fear renewal preferentially activates ventral hippocampal neurons projecting to both amygdala and prefrontal cortex in rats

Fear extinction relies on ventral hippocampal safety codes shaped by the amygdala

Fear Erasure Facilitated by Immature Inhibitory Neuron Transplantation

Interplay of Amygdala and Cingulate Plasticity in Emotional Fear