Abstract:Floodplains provide numerous ecosystem services that depend on the spatial heterogeneity, or patchiness, of the floodplain. Direct and indirect human alterations of rivers can reduce floodplain heterogeneity and function, but relatively little is known of patterns of floodplain heterogeneity in natural, fully functional floodplains. We quantify floodplain heterogeneity at four sites in the United States with the objectives of (i) developing a method of combining field measurements and remote sensing data products to calculate integrative landscape‐scale metrics of floodplain spatial heterogeneity and (ii) demonstrating which metrics from landscape ecology are likely to be useful for identifying qualities of natural floodplains, differentiating floodplains, and inferring processes, based on a case study of three prairie floodplains and one beaver‐modified floodplain in the continental United States. We developed a new unsupervised classification workflow that combines field data, topography, and Sentinel‐2A imagery to create classified floodplains for all four field sites that could be used to calculate heterogeneity metrics. We identified six heterogeneity metrics for characterizing natural floodplain heterogeneity: aggregation index, interspersion and juxtaposition index, largest patch index, patch density, percentage of like adjacencies, and Shannon's evenness index, and these metrics capture both intermetric (variation in spatial heterogeneity between the floodplains) and intrametric variation (variation in the patterns of the metrics). Results show that natural floodplains have high evenness and interspersion and juxtaposition of classes, and we attribute this to natural flow and sediment regimes driving channel migration, erosion, deposition, vegetation succession, and active beaver modifications. Colorado floodplains show higher aggregation and lower fragmentation than the Oklahoma floodplain. We attribute this to the greater incision and lower hydrologic variability at the Oklahoma site.

Developing more useful equity measurements for flood-risk management

Socioeconomic distributional impacts of evaluating flood mitigation activities using equity-weighted benefit-cost analysis

Exposing Disparities in Flood Adaptation for Equitable Future Interventions

Trade-offs in the design and communication of flood-risk information

Integrating irrational behavior into flood risk models to test the outcomes of policy interventions

Moving from total risk to community-based risk trajectories increases transparency and equity in flood risk mitigation planning along urban rivers

The developing flood rich period: Science evidence and policy evolution for England. Is it time for place‐based socio‐ecological solutions?

Quantifying floodplain heterogeneity with field observation, remote sensing, and landscape ecology: Methods and metrics

Index insurance and climate risk management: Addressing social equity

Exposing disparities in flood adaptation for equitable future interventions in the USA

Public Attitudes Toward Policy Instruments for Flood Risk Management

Enhancing resilience: Integrating future flood modeling and socio-economic analysis in the face of climate change impacts

Earth Observation to Address Inequities in Post‐Flood Recovery

Flooding is Not Like Filling a Bath

Toward an adequate level of detail in flood risk assessments

Weaving Equity into Infrastructure Resilience Research and Practice: A Decadal Review and Future Directions

Urban Flood Resilience Assessment of Zhengzhou Considering Social Equity and Human Awareness

Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross‐country comparison of flood risk management

Does flood risk affect the implied cost of equity capital?

Urban Flood Risk Management Needs Nature-Based Solutions: a Coupled Social-Ecological System Perspective

A Blueprint for Full Collective Flood Risk Estimation: Demonstration for European River Flooding