Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Measuring the condylar volume changes after treatment with skeletally anchored type IV Herbst appliance vs. Twin Force Bite Corrector (TFBC) in class II malocclusion in young adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty class II malocclusion participants were randomly involved in our randomized clinical study. They are divided equally into two groups: group I (10 patients with an age range of 16 to 18 years and a mean age of (17.15 ± 0.62) (five males and five females) with a mean Angle formed between (A) point and (Nasion) point and (B) point, to determine anteroposterior relation between maxilla and mandible (ANB) of 6.20 (1.03) and a mean mandibular length of 106.1 (1.7), who were treated by a skeletally anchored type IV Herbst appliance, supported at the mandible by two mini-plates fixed bilaterally at the mandibular symphysis; group II (10 patients with an age range of 15 to 18 years and a mean age of (16.85 ± 0.33) (six males and four females) with a mean ANB of 6.80 (0.89) and a mean mandibular length of 107.3 (2.36), who were treated by a TFBC that was installed just mesial to the tube of the maxillary first permanent molar and distal to the bracket of the lower canine for 4 months. According to the Index of Orthognathic Functional Treatment Need (IOFTN) index, the participants in both groups have grade 4 (great need for treatment) as they have excessive overjet (6–9 mm). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken just before installing fixed functional appliances and after the removal. The condylar volume was measured using Dolphin software. Parametric measurements were performed by the independent t -test, while non-parametric variables (percent change) were compared by the Mann-Whitney U–test. RESULTS: On the right side, the Herbst group recorded a percent increase (median = 1.23%), while TFBC recorded a median percent decrease (-7.85%). This change is statistically significant ( P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The difference in the condylar volume was significantly higher with the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance than with the dentally anchored TFBC group.

Evaluation of occlusal force in Class II subdivision malocclusion

Archform Comparisons Between Skeletal Class Ii and Iii Malocclusions

[Occlusal Force and Its Distribution in the Position of Maximum Intercuspation in Individual Normal Occlusion: a Cross-Sectional Study].

Effects of Removable Functional Appliances on the Dentoalveolar Unit in Growing Patients

A Primary Study of the Occlusal Force on Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusal Patients Before and after Orthognathic Surgery

Dental and Alveolar Arch Widths in Normal Occlusion and Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

A comparison of dental arch forms between Class II Division 1 and normal occlusion assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.

Comparison of Dentoskeletal Changes In Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using two Different Fixed Functional Appliances: A 2 Case Report

Analysis of Mandibular Position of Patients with Angles Class I and ClassII,Di Vision 1 Malocclusion

Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion

Analysis of the Mandibular Position in Malocclusion Patients.

Comparative Morphometric Study of the Occipital Condyle in Class III and Class I Skeletal Malocclusion Patients

Comparison of condylar position in normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2 and Class III malocclusions using CBCT imaging

Evaluation of pre- and post-treatment masticatory and bite force efficiency in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery using T-Scan Novus occlusal analysis: A factorial randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of Mandibular protraction appliance IV versus PowerScope in treatment of class II malocclusion; A comparative, randomized clinical trial

Analysis and comparison of dental arch symmetry between different Angle's malocclusion categories and normal occlusion

A Case-Control Split-Mouth Study of Comparison of Maximum Occlusal Forces in Endodontically Treated Teeth and Vital Counterparts

[A Study of Consistency of Occlusal Type with Skeletal Pattern and Integumental Profile].

Dentoskeletal morphology of adult Class II division 1 and 2 severe deep overbite malocclusions

Assessment of the condylar response of two differently anchored fixed functional appliances in class II malocclusion in young adult orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial

Comparative evaluation of the dentoalveolar effects of three Class II correctors: A finite element analysis study