Quality Improvement of Urban Public Space from the Perspective of the Flâneur

Li Wang,Xiao Liu,Hao Zheng,Luca Caneparo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060808

IF: 3.905

2024-06-07

Land

Abstract:As the quality of public space has become significant for urban development, the creation of high-quality public spaces is becoming increasingly important. Since the implementation of urban renewal policies, an increasing number of buildings have emerged, creating new types of public spaces. Compared to original public spaces, new public spaces are more open, flexible, and diverse. The design of public spaces is closely related to users and the flâneur can precisely serve as a user and observer to conduct in-depth research. So, our study was conducted under the identity of the flâneur, focusing on two cases in Guangzhou. The flâneur completes the data collection through two methods. Static research involves observing and taking photos, whereas dynamic research involves interviews and questionnaires. This study analysed three aspects: the group category, behavioural diversity, and activity time and evaluated the public space using the NPS scale. The study found that the recommendation rate of new urban public spaces is higher than that of original public spaces. The study also found that original public spaces need to be improved in four ways: equipping furniture facilities, improving traffic congestion, increasing blue-green spaces, and establishing artistic spaces. New urban public spaces need to make efforts to create more interactive spaces and increase stagnation points.

environmental studies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the quality improvement of urban public spaces, especially the quality differences between the newly - emerged public spaces and the original ones after the implementation of urban renewal policies and their improvement methods. Specifically, the research focuses on two aspects:

1. **Quality assessment of new urban public spaces**: With the implementation of urban renewal policies, more and more new buildings have emerged, forming new types of public spaces. Although these new public spaces are open, flexible and diverse, are they truly of high quality? Are there actual problems, such as space idleness?

2. **Usage situation and improvement directions of the original urban public spaces**: How can the original public spaces better serve users? In which aspects need to be improved, such as equipping with furniture facilities, alleviating traffic congestion, increasing blue - green spaces, establishing art spaces?

In order to explore these problems, the research selected two cases in Tianhe South District, Guangzhou for comparative analysis:
- **Case A** (Tiyu Xilu urban public space): Representing the original public space.
- **Case B** (Zhujiang Xincheng urban public space): Representing the new public space.

From the perspective of "flâneur", the research combined static observation and dynamic research methods to conduct in - depth analysis of the public spaces in these two cases. Specific methods include:
- **Static research**: Selecting observation points, recording the behaviors of the crowd and taking pictures.
- **Dynamic research**: Collecting first - hand information through interviews, questionnaires and hand - drawn records, and continuously observing the behaviors of the objects.

The research analyzed from the following aspects:
- **Group categories**: The distribution of different types of users in public spaces.
- **Behavioral diversity**: The types of activities of users in public spaces.
- **Activity time**: The staying time and activity patterns of users in public spaces.
- **NPS satisfaction score**: Evaluating the quality of public spaces through NPS (Net Promoter Score) satisfaction score.

Finally, the research found that the recommendation rate of new urban public spaces is higher than that of the original ones, and put forward specific improvement suggestions, aiming to optimize the usage experience and attractiveness of both types of public spaces.