Reducing unnecessary outpatient group and screen testing at a regional cancer center

Heather VanderMeulen,Akash Gupta,Rena Buckstein,James A. Kennedy,Connie Colavecchia,Jami‐Lynn Viveiros,Yulia Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18020
2024-10-05
Transfusion
Abstract:Background Unnecessary group and screens (G&S) can lead to unnecessary antibody investigations, use of technologist time, and laboratory resources. Local Problem A baseline audit at our institution identified that 25% of G&S from the cancer center were unnecessary. We aimed to reduce the ratio of monthly G&S to CBC samples processed from the cancer center by 10% (from 0.034 to 0.031) by January 2024. Methods This represents an interrupted time series design from November 2022 to January 2024. Using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles, we aimed to increase the use of an existing reflex testing system, termed "do not test." When this option is selected, the blood bank will only process the G&S sample if specific CBC criteria are met (e.g., hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL). Educational sessions increased awareness of this feature and sought feedback from end‐users on its usability. With feedback, the design was updated to include a modifiable hemoglobin threshold for G&S testing, automatic re‐selection of the "do not test" feature for future G&S orders, and aesthetic changes to make the feature more visible. Results The percentage of samples with "do not test" selected increased from 7.2% to 63.0% (p
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?