Patient preferences, regret, and health-related quality of life among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A pilot longitudinal study

Marissa LoCastro,Ying Wang,Chandrika Sanapala,Marielle Jensen-Battaglia,Marsha Wittink,Sally Norton,Jane Liesveld,Eric Huselton,Kah Poh Loh,Heidi D. Klepin,Daniel R. Richardson,Jason H. Mendler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101529
IF: 3.929
2023-05-27
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
Abstract:Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes and is generally incurable. Therefore, understanding preferences of older adults with AML is critical. We sought to assess whether best-worst scaling (BWS) can be used to capture attributes considered by older adults with AML when making initial treatment decisions and longitudinally, as well as assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and decisional regret over time. Materials and Methods In a longitudinal study for adults ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML, we collected: (1) attributes of treatment most important to patients using BWS, (2) HRQoL using EQ-5D-5L, (3) decisional regret using the Decisional Regret Scale, and (4) treatment worthiness using the "Was it worth it?" questionnaire. Data was collected at baseline and over six months. A hierarchical Bayes model was used to allocate percentages out of 100%. Due to small sample size, hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10 (2-tailed). We analyzed how these measures differed by treatment choice (intensive vs. lower intensity treatment). Results Mean age of patients was 76 years ( n = 15). At baseline, the most important attributes of treatment to patients were response to treatment (i.e., chance that the cancer will respond to treatment; 20.9%). Compared to those who received lower intensity treatment ( n = 7) or best supportive care ( n = 2), those who received intensive treatment ( n = 6) generally ranked "alive one year or more after treatment" ( p = 0.03) with higher importance and ranked "daily activities" ( p = 0.01) and "location of treatment" (p = 0.01) with less importance. Overall, HRQoL scores were high. Decisional regret was mild overall and lower for patients who chose intensive treatment ( p = 0.06). Discussion We demonstrated that BWS can be used to assess the importance of various treatment attributes considered by older adults with AML when making initial treatment decisions and longitudinally throughout treatment. Attributes of treatment important to older patients with AML differed between treatment groups and changed over time. Interventions are needed to re-assess patient priorities throughout treatment to ensure care aligns with patient preferences.
oncology,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?