Abstract:Background: The poor-risk cytogenetic subgroup of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) includes various chromosomal aberrations and represents a heterogeneous population of patients with a dismal 10-year overall survival. While the success of genetic landscaping studies is encouraging, it is debatable whether genomics, or indeed any single-omics platform alone, is sufficient to capture the biology of a disease that continues to evade our existing treatments so effectively. Instead, we need to develop a much better understanding of the complexity of this subgroup of AMLs: the relationship and interdependencies across biochemical pathways, how these may differ between patients and their impact on the leukemia and normal stem cell compartments. To launch this process, we have completed a multi-omics profiling programme to shed new light on the genetic and biochemical features of poor-risk AML (https://poor-risk-aml.bham.ac.uk/). Aims: Application of multi-omics and integrative approaches to decipher the complexities of cytogenetically poor-risk AML Methods: Sample inclusion criteria were based on cytogenetics and availability of sufficient diagnostic bone marrow or peripheral blood material for analysis. The 50 primary AMLs included 17 cases with complex karyotype, 13 -7/del(7), 11 KMT2A rearrangements (with the exception of t(9;11)), 4 t(6;9), 3 -5/de(5), 1 del(17) and 1 inv(3). Profiles consisted of a combination of genomics (whole genome sequencing (WGS, 60X for tumour and 30X for germ-line controls), targeted sequencing of 54 myeloid loci, and total RNA-seq (100 million reads per bulk sample), mass spectrometry proteomics and phosphoproteomics (with >6,000 proteins and > 25,000 phosphorylation sites detected and quantified), mass cytometry (CyTOF, 39 markers), drug screening (ranging from 200-500 approved or investigational compounds) and the selective generation of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Results: Near complete datasets have been compiled on all 50 primary AMLs, with the exception of WGS analysis where profiling was restricted to cases where corresponding germline DNA was available. Integration of WGS and RNA-seq data identified 122 genes having notable allele-specific expression (ASE) in ≥ 5 samples supported by ≥ 3 SNPs and these included the transcription factor GATA2 and the DNA topoisomerase TOP1MT. Use of RNA fusion capture tools resolved novel inter- and intra- chromosomal gene rearrangements that were confirmed by WGS. The four t(6;9)(p23;q34)/DEK-NUP214 cases, with a mean age of diagnosis of 43.5 years and all harboring FLT3-ITD mutations, arose from the most immature hematopoietic compartment (CD34+CD117+ enrichment) and demonstrated a unique transcriptomic signature, which included upregulation of FOXO3 and GRP56. Collectively, t(6;9) primary samples also showed a selective drug sensitivity to XPO1 (selinexor and eltanexor) and JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, tofacitinib and momelotinib) compared to other cytogenetic risk groups. On the other hand, a comparison of in vitro drug sensitivity data with genomic data of our entire cohort of patients demonstrated that TP53 wt AMLs (n=37) were more sensitive to all four MDM2 inhibitors (AMG-232, idasanutlin, SAR405838 and NVP-CGM097) compared to TP53 mutated cases (n=13). Comparisons of transcriptomics with the in vitro sensitivity to drugs included in early/late phase AML clinical trials, identified signatures of response associated with MDM2 and Aurora B kinase (AZD1152-HQPA) inhibitors. Phosphoproteomics analysis and machine learning modeling separated KMT2A rearranged leukemias into 2 discrete groups (group A: MLLT4, MLLT10 and TET1; group B with MLLT6, ELL and SEP9 fusion partners). Functionally, group A presented with elevated HOXA10 protein expression and enhanced in vitro response to genotoxic drugs and cell cycle inhibitors when compared to group B leukemia. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of simultaneously generating omics data from several different platforms and highlights that a combination of genetic and proteomic profiles may help to inform the choice of therapies based on the underlying biology of a patient's AML. Disclosures Wennerberg: Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Heckman:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Research Funding; Orion Pharma: Research Funding; Innovative Mediicines Initiative project Harmony: Research Funding.

Prospective feasibility of a minimal BH3 profiling assay in acute myeloid leukemia

Mitochondrial Functional Profiling Links Apoptotic Sensitivity to Treatment Outcomes Based on Age and Cell Lineage in Acute Leukemia

Prognostic value of postinduction medullary myeloid recovery by flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia

Integration of Deep Multi-Omics Profiling Veals New Insights into the Biology of Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Postinduction Minimal Residual Disease Predicts Outcome and Benefit From Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With NPM1 Mutation: A Study by the Acute Leukemia French Association Group

Abstract 2532: Deciphering multiple protein complexes in BCL2 family to measure apoptotic dependencies in acute myeloid leukemia

Optimal prognostic threshold for measurable residual disease positivity by multiparameter flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

The baseline comorbidity burden affects survival in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving hypomethylating agents: Results from a multicentric clinical study

Prognostic value of multicenter flow cytometry harmonized assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloblastic leukemia

Relationship between Mitochondrial Oxphos Kinetics and Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Chromatin Profiles Are Prognostic of Clinical Response to Bortezomib-Containing Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the COG AAML1031 Trial

Abstract P27: Proteogenomic and metabolomic analysis of acute myeloid leukemia reveals molecular and functional underpinnings of cellular and clinical phenotypes

Complementary dynamic BH3 profiles predict co-operativity between the multi-kinase inhibitor TG02 and the BH3 mimetic ABT-199 in acute myeloid leukaemia cells

Abstract 3904: Multiplexed flow cytometry based immunophenotyping paired with functional ex vivo (MFLEX) drug profiling informs potential efficacy of therapeutic agents in acute myeloid leukemia

Proteomics for optimizing therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents versus conventional chemotherapy

The influence of BCL2, BAX, and ABCB1 gene expression on prognosis of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype patients

Importance of assessing cytogenetic and molecular risk factors in acute myeloid leukemia therapy

Genomic Landscape and Risk-Stratification for De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Normal Cytogenetics and No NPM1 or FLT3-itd Mutation

TMT-based Comprehensive Proteomic Profiling Identifies Serum Prognostic Signatures of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Diagnostic Bone Marrow Specimens Identifies Mutational Profiles Predictive of Relapse in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Undergo Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Integrated Bioinformatic Analysis of Mitochondrial Metabolism-Related Genes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.