Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs

Taylor Riley,Anna E. Fiastro,Lyndsey S. Benson,Anuj Khattar,Sarah Prager,Emily M. Godfrey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847

2024-05-30

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cohort study evaluates changes in abortion provision and delays to care after Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Impact of the Dobbs decision on abortion services from a large tertiary center in Oregon

Ava D Mandelbaum,Erin C Nacev,Megan F Fuerst,Alyssa Colwill,Shaalini Ramanadhan,Maria Rodriguez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110484

IF: 3.051

2024-05-12

Contraception

Abstract:Objective Evaluate the impact of the Dobbs vs Jackson decision on abortion volume and patient characteristics in Oregon, a state with no legal restrictions on abortion, at a single tertiary care hospital. Methods Electronic health records from patients who received an abortion at Oregon's largest tertiary health center were utilized comparing the year before and after Dobbs . Results Monthly average abortions increased from 57.8 pre- Dobbs to 77.1 post- Dobbs (p=0.001). This trend was associated with an increased proportion of out-of-state patients (14.3% vs 9.5%, p=0.004) presenting with gestational duration ≥ 26 weeks (23.6% vs 3.7% in-state, p<0.001). Conclusions The Dobbs decision resulted in increased utilization of hospital-based abortion care in a protective state, characterized by a greater prevalence of patients traveling from out-of-state and presenting at later gestational durations. These trends reflect the critical role of protective states in preserving access to abortion care.

obstetrics & gynecology
Longitudinal Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization on Abortion Service Delivery in Ohio, 2022‒2023

Mikaela H Smith,Michelle L McGowan,Courtney Kerestes,Danielle Bessett,Alison H Norris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307775

Abstract:Objectives. To assess the impact of Ohio's abortion policy changes on abortion provision following Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization. Methods. We analyzed quantitative and write-in responses from an ongoing survey of 6 abortion facilities in Ohio for 3 time periods: January‒June 2022 (pre-Dobbs), July‒September 2022 (6-week ban in effect), and October 2022‒June 2023 (post-Dobbs, ban blocked). We disaggregated counts by method, gestation, and state of residence. Results. Following Dobbs, Ohio banned abortions after detection of embryonic cardiac activity, and monthly abortion provision decreased 56%. Several months after the ban was lifted, monthly abortion means exceeded pre-Dobbs means. The percentage of patients from out of state increased over time. Conclusions. The post-Dobbs enactment of a restrictive abortion ban drastically reduced availability of reproductive health care in Ohio. Nevertheless, Ohio remained an important destination for patients from surrounding states with abortion restrictions. Public Health Implications. Gestational bans decrease access to necessary health care; instead, states like Ohio should work to eliminate barriers to abortion care to support the health and well-being of people in their own and surrounding states. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1034-1042. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307775).
Post- Dobbs Abortion Restrictions and the Families They Leave Behind

Nigel Madden,Emma Trawick,Katie Watson,Lynn M Yee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792

Abstract:The June 24, 2022 US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization resulted in an expansive restriction on abortion access that had been constitutionally guaranteed for nearly half a century. Currently, 14 states have implemented complete bans on abortion with very limited exceptions, and an additional 7 states have implemented abortion bans at 6 to 18 weeks' gestation. It has been well demonstrated that restrictive policies disproportionately limit abortion access for minoritized people and people of low socioeconomic status; the financial and geographic barriers of these post-Dobbs restrictions will only exacerbate this disparity. Proponents of abortion restrictions, who identify as pro-life, assert that these policies are essential to protect children, women, and families. We examine whether the protection of these groups extends past conception by evaluating the association between state abortion legislation and state-based policies and programs designed to provide medical and social support for children, women, and families. We found that states with the most restrictive post-Dobbs abortion policies in fact have the least comprehensive and inclusive public infrastructure to support these groups. We suggest further opportunities for advocacy. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1043-1050. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307792).
Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization Decision

Abigail R. A. Aiken,Elisa S. Wells,Rebecca Gomperts,James G. Scott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.4266

IF: 11.816

2024-03-25

JAMA

Abstract:Importance The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned the right to choose abortion in the US, with at least 16 states subsequently implementing abortion bans or 6-week gestational limits. Prior research indicates that in the 6 months following Dobbs , approximately 32 360 fewer abortions were provided within the US formal health care setting. However, trends in the provision of medications for self-managed abortion outside the formal health care setting have not been studied. Objective To determine whether the provision of medications for self-managed abortion outside the formal health care setting increased in the 6 months after Dobbs . Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional study using data from sources that provided abortion medications outside the formal health care setting to people in the US between March 1 and December 31, 2022, including online telemedicine organizations, community networks, and online vendors. Using a hierarchical bayesian model, we imputed missing values from sources not providing data. We estimated the change in provision of medications for self-managed abortion after the Dobbs decision. We then estimated actual use of these medications by accounting for the possibility that not all provided medications are used by recipients. Exposure Abortion restrictions following the Dobbs decision. Main Outcomes and Measures Provision and use of medications for a self-managed abortion. Results In the 6-month post- Dobbs period (July 1 to December 31, 2022), the total number of provisions of medications for self-managed abortion increased by 27 838 (95% credible interval [CrI], 26 374-29 175) vs what would have been expected based on pre- Dobbs levels. Excluding imputed data changes the results only slightly (27 145; 95% CrI, 25 747-28 246). Accounting for nonuse of medications, actual self-managed medication abortions increased by an estimated 26 055 (95% CrI, 24 739-27 245) vs what would have been expected had the Dobbs decision not occurred. Conclusions and Relevance Provision of medications for self-managed abortions increased in the 6 months following the Dobbs decision. Results suggest that a substantial number of abortion seekers accessed services despite the implementation of state-level bans and restrictions.

medicine, general & internal
Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After Dobbs Decision

Dima M. Qato,Rebecca Myerson,Andrew Shooshtari,Jenny S. Guadamuz,G. Caleb Alexander

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620

2024-06-27

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This cohort study evaluates the association between the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision and fills for oral and emergency contraceptives in states that enacted the most restrictive abortion policies after the decision.

medicine, general & internal
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review

David T. Zhu,Lucy Zhao,Tala Alzoubi,Novera Shenin,Teerkasha Baskaran,Julia Tikhonov,Catherine Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288947

IF: 3.7

2024-03-29

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Introduction On June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v . Jackson reversed the precedent set forth by Roe v . Wade , empowering individual states to regulate abortion care. This aftermath of this ruling has given rise to widespread bans, limiting the accessibility of abortion services for patients and impeding providers’ ability to deliver a comprehensive spectrum of reproductive health services. Of particular concern is the disproportionate impact on medically underserved groups, further heightening existing social and structural disparities in reproductive health. Methods We conducted a scoping review to broadly evaluate the clinical and public health impact of Dobbs on patients’ access to abortion care and related reproductive health services, in addition to the training and clinical practice of healthcare providers. We searched eight bibliographic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Science Direct, JSTOR, and Web of Science) and three preprint servers (medRxiv, bioRxiv, and Europe PMC) using various combinations of keywords related to ‘abortion’, ‘Dobbs’, and ‘Roe’ on March 22, 2023. Four reviewers independently screened the studies based on pre-specified eligibility criteria and one reviewer performed data extraction for pre-identified themes. The search was conducted based on PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRSIMA-ScR) guidelines. Results Eighteen studies, comprising 12 peer-reviewed articles and 6 study abstracts, met the inclusion criteria. The studies demonstrated that Dobbs increased demand for contraception, magnified existing travel- and cost-related barriers to access, further polarized views on abortion and complex family planning on social media (e.g., Twitter), and evoked substantial concerns among medical trainees regarding their scope of practice and potential legal repercussions for providing abortion care. Conclusion In the wake of Dobbs v . Jackson , further public health and clinical interventions are urgently needed to bridge disparities in abortion care and reproductive health, mitigating the deleterious consequences of this emerging public health crisis.

multidisciplinary sciences
Beyond the decision: Reproductive justice and cervical cancer care in a post-Dobbs era

Emily A Miller,Bhoomika Chowdhary,Eloise Chapman-Davis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.08.013

2024-08-29

Abstract:Cervical cancer is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers in pregnancy and for some patients, abortion may be desired or recommended. The Dobbs v Jackson decision has the potential to limit choice while exacerbating disparities in cervical cancer care. We highlight the necessity of employing a reproductive justice framework to both clinical care and research for cervical cancer care in pregnancy to increase access to reproductive choice and to address inequities.
Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision

Claire D Brindis,Melissa H Laitner,Ellen Wright Clayton,Susan C Scrimshaw,Barbara J Grosz,Lisa A Simpson,Sara Rosenbaum,Corale L Brierley,Melissa A Simon,Yvette Roubideaux,Bruce N Calonge,Paula A Johnson,Laura DeStefano,Ashley Bear,Kavita S Arora,Victor J Dzau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6

2024-06-22

Abstract:The Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, which revoked the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, has impacted the national medical workforce. Impacts vary across states, but providers in states with restrictive abortion laws now must contend with evolving legal and ethical challenges that have the potential to affect workforce safety, mental health, education, and training opportunities, in addition to having serious impacts on patient health and far-reaching societal consequences. Moreover, Dobbs has consequences on almost every facet of the medical workforce, including on physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and others who work within the health-care system. Comprehensive research is urgently needed to understand the wide-ranging implications of Dobbs on the medical workforce, including legal, ethical, clinical, and psychological dimensions, to inform evidence-based policies and standards of care in abortion-restrictive settings. Lessons from the USA might also have global relevance for countries facing similar restrictions on reproductive care.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications After Abortion Access Changes

Maya M. Hammoud,Helen K. Morgan,Karen George,Arthur T. Ollendorff,John L. Dalrymple,Dana Dunleavy,Min Zhu,Erika Banks,Bukky Ajagbe Akingbola,AnnaMarie Connolly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55017

2024-02-08

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:his cross-sectional study assesses changes in the percentage of applicants to gynecology residency programs in states that implemented abortion restrictions after the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.

medicine, general & internal
Access to Safe Abortion for Survivors of Rape

Deborah Grady,Sharon K. Inouye,Mitchell H. Katz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0019

2024-03-05

JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract:The US Supreme Court's decision in the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization case allows individual states to determine access to abortion. Since the decision, 14 states have prohibited abortion at any gestational age.

medicine, general & internal
189. Young People's Knowledge and Understanding of Abortion Laws in a Non-Restrictive State Following the Dobbs Decision

Courtney L. Franceschi,Molly Richards,Jeanelle Sheeder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.11.388

IF: 7.898

2024-02-01

Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract:Increased discourse about abortion following the Supreme Court vs. Dobbs decision in June 2022, complicated by different state laws and regulations, could complicate adolescent and young adult (AYA) understanding of abortion legality, leading to confusion for young people who may be misinformed about abortion laws and restrictions even if living in a permissive state. This creates health inequities for people who experience barriers to reproductive healthcare access. Our objective was to assess

pediatrics,public, environmental & occupational health,psychology, developmental
Abortion policy, politics, and mental health: evidence from the Dobbs decision

Sankar Mukhopadhyay,Aina Katsikas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-024-09711-y

2024-05-26

Review of Economics of the Household

Abstract:After the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization , abortion regulations are subject to state jurisdiction. Therefore, individuals in different states face very different levels of restrictions. We compare self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression among individuals living in states with limited or no access to abortion care to individuals in states with relatively few or no restrictions before and after the Dobbs decision using high-frequency, nationally representative data from the Household Pulse Survey and Difference in Difference regressions. Estimates suggest that respondents in the restricted states are 7.4% more likely to experience moderate to severe anxiety compared to unrestricted states. We show that trends in anxiety were similar in restricted and unrestricted states before the Dobbs decision, suggesting that the estimates may have a causal interpretation. Robustness checks rule out alternative explanations, such as the ending of the Emergency Allotment of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

economics
Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision

Mary D. Willis,Molly N. Hoffman,Tanran R. Wang,Erika L. Sabbath,Andrea S. Kuriyama,Amelia K. Wesselink,Lauren A. Wise

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13080

2024-04-28

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Abstract:Background On June 24th, 2022, the United States (US) Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson, et al. (hereafter, the Dobbs decision) removed federal‐level protections for induced abortion, sparking concerns about reproductive rights and health privacy. Although other pregnancy outcomes (e.g. spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy) are not explicit targets of post‐Dobbs abortion bans, study participants may be worried about how their reproductive health data are used by researchers in the post‐Dobbs era. Objective To evaluate the extent to which the Dobbs decision influenced participant's engagement in a preconception cohort study. Methods We leveraged data spanning 20 weeks before and after the Dobbs decision (4 February 2022, to 11 November 2022) from US participants in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), an internet‐based prospective preconception cohort study of couples attempting conception. We categorised participants' state‐level abortion access by residential location: banned or restricted rights; limited access; and protected rights. We evaluated three participant engagement outcomes: follow‐up questionnaire completion; report of a pregnancy; and clicking on the invitation link for a fertility‐tracking app. We fit separate linear regression models and restricted cubic splines to compare outcome prevalence before and after the Dobbs decision by state‐level abortion category. Results A total of 585 newly enrolled participants and 1247 already‐enrolled participants received 2802 invitations to complete a follow‐up questionnaire. In states with limited or protected abortion rights, we observed little change in participant engagement. In states with banned or restricted abortion rights, however, we observed a 27.12 percentage point reduction (95% confidence interval −43.68, −10.51) in the prevalence of clicking on the invitation link for the fertility‐tracking app comparing the post‐ versus pre‐Dobbs periods. Conclusions There was some evidence of reduced participant engagement after the Dobbs decision in states with banned or restricted abortion rights, indicating potentially deleterious effects on the conduct of reproductive health studies.

pediatrics,public, environmental & occupational health,obstetrics & gynecology
Navigating the Impact of the Dobbs Decision: Perspectives from Pediatric Surgeons on Reproductive Health Care

Amanpreet Brar,Sindhu V Mannava,Utsav M Patwardhan,Veronica F Sullins,Elizabeth A Berdan,Cole D Greves,Kenneth W Gow,Erica Carlisle,KuoJen Tsao,Catherine Hunter,Joanne E Baerg,J Leslie Knod

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000001092

2024-04-05

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract:SUMMARY: Nationwide abortion restrictions resulting from the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) decision have generated confusion and uncertainty among healthcare professionals, with concerns for liability impacting clinical decision-making and outcomes. The impact on pediatric surgery can be seen in prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly cases, counseling for fetal intervention, and recommendations for pregnant children and adolescents who seek termination. It is essential that all physicians and healthcare team members understand the legal implications on their clinical practices, engage with resources and organizations which can help navigate these circumstances, and consider advocating for patients and themselves. Pediatric surgeons must consider the impact of these changing laws on their ability to provide comprehensive and ethical care and counseling to all patients.

surgery
Navigating the post- Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective

Alaina Pyle,Shannon Y. Adams,DonnaMaria E. Cortezzo,Jessica T. Fry,Natalia Henner,Naomi Laventhal,Matthew Lin,Kevin Sullivan,C. Lydia Wraight

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-01884-9

2024-01-30

Journal of Perinatology

Abstract:Restrictive abortion laws have impacts reaching far beyond the immediate sphere of reproductive health, with cascading effects on clinical and ethical aspects of neonatal care, as well as perinatal palliative care. These laws have the potential to alter how families and clinicians navigate prenatal and postnatal medical decisions after a complex fetal diagnosis is made. We present a hypothetical case to explore the nexus of abortion care and perinatal care of fetuses and infants with life-limiting conditions. We will highlight the potential impacts of limited abortion access on families anticipating the birth of these infants. We will also examine the legally and morally fraught gray zone of gestational viability where both abortion and resuscitation of live-born infants can potentially occur, per parental discretion. These scenarios are inexorably impacted by the rapidly changing legal landscape in the U.S., and highlight difficult ethical dilemmas which clinicians may increasingly need to navigate.

pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Considerations for future violence research.

Kelly Cue Davis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000530

2024-11-21

Psychology of Violence

Abstract:Objective: For decades, research has supported linkages among reproductive health factors and interpersonal violence, including sexual violence and intimate partner violence. However, much of this research occurred before June 2022, when the U.S. Supreme Court reversed almost 50 years of federally legal abortion in the United States in their landmark decision of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case. Given the relative recency of this decision, it is unclear how the previously demonstrated intersections of violence and reproductive health may be influenced by this momentous change in reproductive rights and access to care. Method: In this perspective, I consider the current empirical evidence regarding the intersections of reproductive health and interpersonal violence, with particular emphasis on future research needed in this area due to the changes in reproductive health legislation across the United States. Results: Several potential research directions were identified, including (a) the impact of unacknowledged rape, rape myths, stigma, victim credibility, and legal gray areas on the utilization of "rape exceptions" to abortion bans; (b) elevated risks during pregnancy such as recovery from trauma and intimate partner violence; (c) reproductive coercion issues; and (d) potential new forms of perpetrator abuse. Conclusions: Because interpersonal violence and reproductive health are inextricably linked, future violence research conducted in the United States would benefit from consideration of the nation's changing reproductive health care landscape in order to inform prevention efforts, clinical considerations, and policy decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, clinical,family studies,criminology & penology
Institutional leadership after Dobbs : a mixed methods analysis of US medical schools' public statements regarding abortion

Sarah M McNeilly,Vivian E Kim,Carmen Conroy,Antoinette Danvers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013641

IF: 8.056

2024-01-01

BMJ Global Health

Abstract:Introduction Medical schools, as significant and influential organisations within their communities, have the potential and the capacity to impact abortion policy. Organisations often engage in advocacy by issuing public statements that clarify their stance on specific policies. This study analyses the quantity and quality of publicly discoverable statements that US medical schools issued regarding Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization . Methods We conducted a mixed methods study using an explanatory sequential design. Using qualitative analysis, an inductive thematic approach was used to identify themes from public statements made within 6 months of 2 May 2022, Dobbs leak. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association between themes and institutional characteristics. Results Most institutions (n=124/188, 65.96%) did not issue public statements regarding Dobbs . Among all 188 US medical schools, allopathic institutions (OR=12.19, 95% CI (2.83 to 52.57), p=0.001), schools in protective states (OR=3.35, 95% CI (1.78 to 6.29), p<0.0001) and those with family planning divisions (OR=4.60, 95% CI (2.33 to 9.08), p<0.0001) were at increased odds of issuing statements. Of the 64 medical schools with statements, 64.06% (n=41/64) espoused pro-choice views, 34.37% (n=22) were neutral/non-committal and 1.56% (n=1) expressed antiabortion views. Those in protective states were at 3.35 times increased odds of issuing pro-choice statements (95% CI (1.16 to 9.72), p=0.03) compared with restrictive counterparts. Conclusion Medical schools largely did not take a public stance on Dobbs . By refraining from actively engaging in this critical discourse, medical schools are foregoing a leadership opportunity to affect meaningful sociopolitical change, particularly in states with restrictive abortion laws.

public, environmental & occupational health
"I Went Into This Field to Empower Other People, and I Feel Like I Failed": Residents Experience Moral Distress Post- Dobbs

Jema K Turk,Emily Claymore,Nafeesa Dawoodbhoy,Jody E Steinauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00582.1

Abstract:Background The 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization nullified the constitutional right to abortion, which led to effective bans in at least 14 US states and placed obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents in dilemmas where they may have to withhold care, potentially causing moral distress-a health care workforce phenomenon less understood among resident physicians. Objective To identify and explore moral distress experienced by OB/GYN residents due to care restrictions post-Dobbs. Methods In 2023, we invited OB/GYN residents, identified by their program directors, training in states with restricted abortion access, to participate in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews via Zoom about their experiences caring for patients post-Dobbs. We used thematic analysis to analyze interview data. Results Twenty-one residents described their experiences of moral distress due to restrictions. We report on 3 themes in their accounts related to moral distress (and 4 subthemes): (1) challenges to their physician identity (inability to do the job, internalized distress, and reconsidering career choices); (2) participating in care that exacerbates inequities (and erodes patient trust); and (3) determination to advocate for and provide abortion care in the future. Conclusions OB/GYN residents grappled with moral distress and identified challenges from abortion restrictions.
Pregnancy Complications After Dobbs: The Role of EMTALA

Kimberly Chernoby,Brian Acunto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.61457

2024-01-06

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:In June 2023, the Supreme Court declared that there was no longer a right to abortion under the federal constitution. This decision has allowed states to promulgate different restrictions on abortion, many of which implicate the practice of emergency medicine. An abortion is defined as a "medical intervention provided to individuals who need to end the medical condition of pregnancy" and includes care such as termination of an ectopic pregnancy and induction of labor for previable preterm premature rupture of membranes—interventions that emergency physicians either perform or rely on the assistance of consultants to perform. State bans on abortion must be evaluated against duties under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, a federal law that preempts state law. In this paper we examine the conflict between state and federal law as it applies to emergency abortion care and describe how emergency physicians can continue caring for patients.

emergency medicine
Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision

Caila Brander,Jessica Nouhavandi,Terri-Ann Thompson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.34675

2024-10-05

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Importance Online pharmacies have emerged as stakeholders in abortion care since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relaxed in-person dispensing requirements in 2020. The role of online pharmacies in dispensing abortion medications following the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on June 24, 2022, is understudied. Objective To describe medication abortion prescription fulfillment patterns for 1 online pharmacy 1 year before and after the Dobbs v Jackson decision, considering patient, prescriber, and state policy characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study assesses deidentified medication abortion prescription fulfilment data from 1 online pharmacy. Prescribers sent prescription requests to the online pharmacy, which dispensed abortion medications to patients by mail. The study sample included prescription requests fulfilled by the online pharmacy between June 20, 2021, and June 24, 2023, for patients aged at least 18 years who received the combined medication abortion regimen. Data were analyzed from July 2023 to July 2024. Exposures The US Supreme Court Dobbs v Jackson decision on June 24, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient and prescriber characteristics are described, including patient age, state to which the prescription was sent, medications prescribed, and prescribing prescriber's clinic care modality (in-person only, hybrid [in-person and virtual], and virtual only). States were grouped according to the Guttmacher Institute classification of policy support for abortion (most or very supportive, somewhat supportive, and somewhat restrictive). Fulfillment trends were disaggregated by prescriber modality and state policy environment; 2 states with similar telehealth but differing coverage policies (Illinois and Colorado) were compared. Results The dataset included 87 942 observations. Most prescriptions were sent to individuals younger than 30 years (57.1%), with a mean (SD) age of 28.7 (6.4) years. Throughout the study period, the greatest volume of prescription requests came from states with most or very supportive policies and from prescribers at virtual-only platforms. More prescriptions were sent in the year after Dobbs v Jackson (daily mean [SD], 88.5 [47.2] prescriptions in March 2022 vs 201.5 [97.5] prescriptions in March 2023) with fulfillment spikes following the Dobbs v Jackson leak on May 2, 2022, and decision on June 24, 2022. State policy contexts mirrored the overall trends, while prescriber modality trends were unique, with a big spike in fulfillment at 12 weeks after the Dobbs v Jackson decision for hybrid clinics compared with in-person-only clinics and telehealth-only platforms, which saw their largest spikes in mean daily prescription fulfillment the week immediately after Dobbs v Jackson . Illinois and Colorado had similar fulfillment trends, with spikes immediately following the Dobbs v Jackson decision and overall higher fulfillment after Dobbs v Jackson , with a daily mean (SD) of 10.5 (7.0) prescriptions in Illinois and 8.8 (5.7) prescriptions in Colorado in March 2022 versus 26.6 (13.6) prescriptions in Illinois and 16.7 (10.1) prescriptions in Colorado in March 2023. Conclusions and Relevance These findings illustrate the increasingly critical role online pharmacies play in direct-to-patient abortion care provision in the US and the strong linkages between virtual-only prescribers and online pharmacies. These findings suggest that barriers to accessing online pharmacies for abortion care should be removed.

medicine, general & internal

Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs

Impact of the Dobbs decision on abortion services from a large tertiary center in Oregon

Longitudinal Impact of Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization on Abortion Service Delivery in Ohio, 2022‒2023

Post- Dobbs Abortion Restrictions and the Families They Leave Behind

Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization Decision

Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After Dobbs Decision

Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review

Beyond the decision: Reproductive justice and cervical cancer care in a post-Dobbs era

Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision

Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications After Abortion Access Changes

Access to Safe Abortion for Survivors of Rape

189. Young People's Knowledge and Understanding of Abortion Laws in a Non-Restrictive State Following the Dobbs Decision

Abortion policy, politics, and mental health: evidence from the Dobbs decision

Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision

Navigating the Impact of the Dobbs Decision: Perspectives from Pediatric Surgeons on Reproductive Health Care

Navigating the post- Dobbs landscape: ethical considerations from a perinatal perspective

The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Considerations for future violence research.

Institutional leadership after Dobbs : a mixed methods analysis of US medical schools' public statements regarding abortion

"I Went Into This Field to Empower Other People, and I Feel Like I Failed": Residents Experience Moral Distress Post- Dobbs

Pregnancy Complications After Dobbs: The Role of EMTALA

Online Medication Abortion Direct-to-Patient Fulfillment Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Decision