Abstract:The telegraph model is the standard model of stochastic gene expression, which can be solved exactly to obtain the distribution of mature RNA numbers per cell. A modification of this model also leads to an analytical distribution of the nascent RNA numbers. These solutions are routinely used for the analysis of single-cell data, including the inference of transcriptional parameters. However, these models neglect important mechanistic features of transcription elongation, such as the stochastic movement of RNA polymerases and their steric interactions. Here we construct a model of gene expression describing promoter switching between inactive and active states, binding of RNA polymerases in the active state, their stochastic movement including steric interactions along the gene, and their unbinding leading to a mature transcript that subsequently decays. We derive the steady-state distributions of the nascent and mature RNA numbers in two important limiting cases: constitutive expression and slow promoter switching. We show that RNA fluctuations are suppressed by steric interactions between RNA polymerases, and that this suppression can even lead to sub-Poissonian fluctuations; these effects are most pronounced for nascent RNA and less prominent for mature RNA, since the latter is not a direct sensor of transcription. We find a relationship between the parameters of our microscopic mechanistic model and those of the standard models that ensures excellent consistency in their prediction of the first and second RNA number moments over vast regions of parameter space, encompassing slow, intermediate, and rapid promoter switching, provided the RNA number distributions are Poissonian or super-Poissonian. Furthermore, we identify the limitations of inference from mature RNA data, specifically showing that it cannot differentiate between highly distinct RNA polymerase traffic patterns on a gene.

Quantifying and correcting bias in transcriptional parameter inference from single-cell data

Quantifying how post-transcriptional noise and gene copy number variation bias transcriptional parameter inference from mRNA distributions

Parameterizing Cell-to-cell Regulatory Heterogeneities Via Stochastic Transcriptional Profiles

Interpretable and tractable models of transcriptional noise for the rational design of single-molecule quantification experiments

Uncovering the effect of RNA polymerase steric interactions on gene expression noise: analytical distributions of nascent and mature RNA numbers

Gene expression model inference from snapshot RNA data using Bayesian non-parametrics

Cgcorrect: a Method to Correct for Confounding Cell-Cell Variation Due to Cell Growth in Single-Cell Transcriptomics

Single-cell Analysis of Transcription Kinetics Across the Cell Cycle

Stochastic Simulation And Statistical Inference Platform For Visualization And Estimation Of Transcriptional Kinetics

Quantitative comparison of single-cell RNA sequencing versus single-molecule RNA imaging for quantifying transcriptional noise

A mechanistic model for the negative binomial distribution of single-cell mRNA counts

Dissecting and improving gene regulatory network inference using single-cell transcriptome data

Global transcription regulation revealed from dynamical correlations in time-resolved single-cell RNA-sequencing

Deciphering transcriptional dynamics in vivo by counting nascent RNA molecules

Nascent RNA kinetics with complex promoter architecture: Analytic results and parameter inference

Accelerated Bayesian inference of gene expression models from snapshots of single-cell transcripts

Estimating intrinsic and extrinsic noise from single-cell gene expression measurements

Bayesian inference of gene expression states from single-cell RNA-seq data

Single-Molecule Analysis of Transcription Dynamics to Understand the Relationship Between Epigenetic Alterations and Transcriptional Variability

Joint distribution of nuclear and cytoplasmic mRNA levels in stochastic models of gene expression: analytical results and parameter inference

Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression