Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
Auemphon Mordmuang,Lunla Udomwech,Kulwadee Karnjana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S310862
2021-06-09
Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Auemphon Mordmuang, 1 Lunla Udomwech, 1, 2 Kulwadee Karnjana 1 1 School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand; 2 Walailak University Hospital, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand Correspondence: Kulwadee Karnjana School of Medicine, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand Tel +66 7567-2801 Fax +66 75 672-807 Email Purpose: The present study aimed to compare the existing soft contact lens (CL) materials regarding their influence on bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion susceptibility. Then, the study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions and evaluate the ability of cleaning regimens in terms of anti-bacterial adhesion and biofilm removal on different soft CL materials. Methods: Bacterial biofilm formation on CLs was evaluated by biomass assay. Adhesion assay and standard plate count were carried out at time-interval periods within 24 h. Various CL disinfecting procedures were assessed for their efficacy to remove biofilm and reduce bacterial adhesion. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed for the morphological assessment of bacterial biofilm. Results: Printed hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) CLs significantly demonstrated more biofilm staining and bacterial attachment when compared with non-printed HEMA CLs, while the Filcon II 3 and Nesofilcon A CLs possessed less biofilm biomass and adherent cells. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa represented the highest biofilm producing bacteria on HEMA-based materials in this study. The disinfecting regimen with the highest efficacy was the two-step system, first using multipurpose disinfecting solution containing edetate disodium and sorbic acid (MPDS+EDSA), followed by soaking in multipurpose solution (MPS). The regimen demonstrated the greatest effect against the pre-formed biofilm and the adhesion activity of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa on the soft CLs. The SEM micrographs confirmed the morphological changes of bacterial biofilm after disinfecting and revealed that the two-step system treated CLs displayed less adherent bacteria. Conclusion: HEMA-based soft CLs may facilitate bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion capability. The two-step system was the most effective regimen for biofilm removal, where the soaking period in the disinfecting solution of the no-rub regimen should last more than 6 h to remove pre-formed biofilm. Keywords: lens materials, bacterial adhesion, biofilm formation, disinfection, soft contact lens It is estimated that over 153 million people worldwide (2.67% of the world's population) are visually impaired from uncorrected refractive errors. 1 Although the most common method for correcting the refractive error is the use of spectacles, it was reported that 16.7% of adult Americans (40.9 million) wear CLs. 2 The prevalence of CL use observed in some population-based studies can be even greater in number; for example, a study among medical students from Saudi Arabia indicated 40.5% of the students wore CLs. 3 CLs have a greater advantage over glasses in many aspects, such as cosmetics, compatibility for anisometropia, shorter adjustment period, resolving weight issues in high refractive error, and treatment of choice for irregular astigmatism. They are widely available, especially soft CLs, which can be bought readily from pharmacies, optical stores, and even convenience stores in some countries. 4 However, the popularity of CLs also brought more CL-related complications, which are most frequently caused by inappropriate CL care routines. 5–8 A high proportion of CL users committed some mistakes in their CL care practice. 9 , 10 Nevertheless, adherence to an improper care habits is a risk factor for developing CL-related microbial keratitis, which can lead to permanent visual loss. 11 , 12 Then, several systems of CL cleaning and disinfection were developed to prevent these complications. Wearing CLs creates a barrier for corneal respiration, which restricts direct exposure to the atmosphere and reduces corneal oxygenation. A prolonged period of CL wear in conjunction with the less oxygen permeability, especially for CLs made of older generation materials such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), can result in corneal hypoxia. This can cause discomfort, dryness, corneal edema, and increased risks of serious ocular infection. <a -Abstract Truncated-