Abstract:Loorits (2014) identifies the solution to the hard problem of consciousness in the possibility of fully analyzing seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness in structural terms. However, research on consciousness conducted in recent decades has failed to bridge the explanatory gap between the brain and conscious mind. One reason why the explanatory gap cannot be filled, and consequently the problem remains hard, is that experience and neural structure are too different or "distant" to be directly compatible. Conversely, structural aspects of consciousness can be found in phenomenal experience. One possible alternative, therefore, is to seek the structure of seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness not in the neural substrate, but within consciousness itself, through a phenomenal analysis of the qualitative aspects of experience, starting from its simplest forms. An essential premise is to reformulate the explanandum of consciousness, which is usually attributed to qualia and what it is like to be in a certain state. However, these properties do not allow us to identify the fundamental aspects of phenomenal experience. Sensations such as the redness of red or the painfulness of pain are inseparable from the context of the experience to which they belong, making qualia appear as phenomenal artifacts. Furthermore, the simplest qualitative aspects can be found in early vision. They are involved in perceptual organization and necessarily have relational significance. The unitary set of qualities found in early vision—such as those related to being an object, background or detail—constitutes the explanandum of the simplest forms of consciousness and seems to imply a justifying structure. Although early vision is characterized by interdependent qualitative components that form a unitary whole, we cannot find in it the structure of seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness. Phenomenal appearance alone does not seem sufficient to identify a unitary structure of consciousness. However, the closeness of these characteristics to a unitary structure prompts us to delve into less explored territory, using the components of experience also as possible explanans.

Two types of qualia theory

Sensing Qualia

The Conscious and the Unconscious:A Theory of Duplex Vision

The importance of a consideration of qualia to imagery and cognition

Qualia and Phenomenal Consciousness Arise From the Information Structure of an Electromagnetic Field in the Brain

Towards a Neuroidentity Theory of Qualia

An adjunction hypothesis between qualia and reports

The purpose of qualia: What if human thinking is not (only) information processing?

Qualia as physical measurements: a mathematical model of qualia and pure concepts

Inattentive Perception, Time, and the Incomprehensibility of Consciousness

Qualia are Quantum Leaps

Unique hues: an old problem for a new generation

What about synesthesia? A phenomenological analysis of a perceptual phenomenon

Are Colors Quanta of Light for Human Vision? A Quantum Cognition Study of Visual Perception

The meta-problem and the transfer of knowledge between theories of consciousness: a software engineer's take

Replies to E. J. Green, Zoe Jenkin, and Jack Lyons

The ALARM Theory of Consciousness: A Two-Level Theory of Phenomenal Consciousness

Qualia and the Formal Structure of Meaning

Approaching the nature of consciousness through a phenomenal analysis of early vision. What is the explanandum?

What is it Like to Be a Bot: Simulated, Situated, Structurally Coherent Qualia (S3Q) Theory of Consciousness

Attention, consciousness, and the semantics of questions