Accuracy of Three‐Dimensional Neo Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Simulations With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Different Mitral Phenotypes

Mark M. P. van den Dorpel,Lucas Uchoa de Assis,Jenna van Niekerk,Rutger‐Jan Nuis,Joost Daemen,Claire Ben Ren,Alexander Hirsch,Isabella Kardys,Ben J. L. van den Branden,Ricardo Budde,Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31287
IF: 2.3
2024-11-08
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Background Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is emerging in the context of annular calcification (valve‐in‐MAC; ViMAC), failing surgical mitral annuloplasty (mitral‐valve‐in‐ring; MViR) and failing mitral bioprosthesis (mitral‐valve‐in‐valve; MViV). A notorious risk of TMVR is neo left ventricular outflow tract (neo‐LVOT) obstruction. Three‐dimensional computational models (3DCM) are derived from multi‐slice computed tomography (MSCT) and aim to predict neo‐LVOT area after TMVR. Little is known about the accuracy of these neo‐LVOT predictions for various mitral phenotypes. Methods Preprocedural 3DCMs were created for ViMAC, MViR and MViV cases. Throughout the cardiac cycle, neo‐LVOT dimensions were semi‐automatically calculated on the 3DCMs. We compared the predicted neo‐LVOT area on the preprocedural 3DCM with the actual neo‐LVOT as measured on the post‐procedural MSCT. Results Across 12 TMVR cases and examining 20%–70% of the cardiac phase, the mean difference between predicted and post‐TMVR neo‐LVOT area was −23 ± 28 mm2 for MViR, −21 ± 34 mm2 for MViV and −73 ± 61 mm2 for ViMAC. The mean intra‐class correlation coefficient for absolute agreement between predicted and post‐procedural neo‐LVOT area (throughout the whole cardiac cycle) was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82–0.94, p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?