Dyadic practice for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills (DALS)—A randomized controlled trial

Angus M. A. Ritchie,Noor Chaudhry,Samuel J. A. Robinson,Maurizio Pacilli,Ramesh M. Nataraja
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12074
IF: 3.282
2024-01-20
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Background Laparoscopic simulation is integral to surgical education but requires significant resources. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of dyadic practice (DP), involving two individuals working together, to individual practice (IP) for novices acquiring laparoscopic skills and assess their learning experience. Methods We conducted a Randomized Controlled Trial comparing DP and IP for novice medical students who completed a laparoscopic simulation workshop. Participants were assessed individually pre‐course (test 1), post‐course (test 2), and 8‐week retention (test 3) using a validated quantitative method. A post‐course questionnaire and interview, analyzed with thematic analysis, assessed the learning experience. Results In total, 31 DP and 35 IP participants completed the study. There was no difference in mean scores between DP and IP groups in all three tests: test 1 (p = 0.55), test 2 (p = 0.26), test 3 (p = 0.35). In trend analysis, the DP group improved post‐course (test 1 vs. 2: p = 0.02) and maintained this level at the retention test (2 vs. 3: p = 0.80, 1 vs. 3: p = 0.02). Whilst the IP group also improved post‐course (test 1 vs. 2: p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?