Apatinib combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus PLD for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (APPROVE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase II trial

Tiantian Wang,Ning Li,Jie Tang,HongYing Yang,Rutie Yin,Jingru Zhang,Qi Zhou,Ziling Liu,Lanqin Cao,Li Li,Yi Huang,Kui Jiang,Wei Wang,Fenglin She,Zhiguo Hou,Lingying Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-8258(21)00724-1
IF: 5.304
2021-08-01
Gynecologic Oncology
Abstract:Objectives: Anti-angiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy could improve survival in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC). APPROVE was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits VEGFR-2, in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory recurrent OC. Methods: Eligible patients were histologically confirmed non-mucinous ovarian, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian-tube cancer who had experienced disease progression during, or within 6 months of discontinuing, any prior line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with at least 1 lesion (measurable and/or nonmeasurable) that could be accurately assessed at baseline by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive PLD alone (Arm PLD, 40mg/m2 IV every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles) or with apatinib 250mg orally once daily (Arm A-PLD) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Patients were stratified according to prior platinum-sensitive relapsed (yes vs no) and platinum-free interval (less than 3 vs 3 to 6 months from last platinum therapy to subsequent progression). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST 1.1 in the intent-to-treat population (ITT population). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Between Mar 22, 2018, and Nov 16, 2020, 152 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive A-PLD (n=78) or PLD (n=74). Median follow-up was 8.1months (IQR 3.7-12.8). Median PFS was 5.8 months with A-PLD therapy versus 3.3 months with PLD alone (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.64, P=0.0001). In patients with evaluable disease (Arm A-PLD, n=61; Arm PLD, n=63), the ORR was 37.7% (23/61) versus 9.5% (6/63) for A-PLD and PLD, respectively (P=0.0002). The DCR of A-PLD and PLD arms were 82.0% (50/61) and 58.7% (37/63), respectively (P=0.0050). Overall survival data are immature. Hypertension and hand-foot syndrome were more common with apatinib. No adverse events beyond expectation were reported. Conclusions: Apatinib in combination with PLD statistically significant prolonged PFS in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory recurrent ovarian cancer. ORR and DCR were also significantly improved. Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of apatinib and PLD.
oncology,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?