Disentangling the effects of metabolic cost and accuracy on movement speed
Garrick W. Bruening,Robert J. Courter,Shruthi Sukumar,Megan K. O’Brien,Alaa A. Ahmed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012169
2024-06-01
PLoS Computational Biology
Abstract:On any given day, we make countless reaching movements to objects around us. While such ubiquity may suggest uniformity, each movement's speed is unique—why is this? Reach speed is known to be influenced by accuracy; we slow down to sustain high accuracy. However, in other forms of movement like walking or running, metabolic cost is often the primary determinant of movement speed. Here we bridge this gap and ask: how do metabolic cost and accuracy interact to determine speed of reaching movements? First, we systematically measure the effect of increasing mass on the metabolic cost of reaching across a range of movement speeds. Next, in a sequence of three experiments, we examine how added mass affects preferred reaching speed across changing accuracy requirements. We find that, while added mass consistently increases metabolic cost thereby leading to slower metabolically optimal movement speeds, self-selected reach speeds are slower than those predicted by an optimization of metabolic cost alone. We then demonstrate how a single model that considers both accuracy and metabolic costs can explain preferred movement speeds. Together, our findings provide a unifying framework to illuminate the combined effects of metabolic cost and accuracy on movement speed and highlight the integral role metabolic cost plays in determining reach speed. How the brain implicitly controls movement speed remains unclear despite the prevalence of anomalous movement slowing in a range of movement and mental health disorders. Reaching speed has long been thought to be dictated by accuracy. Despite the predominant influence of metabolic cost on walking speed, any influence of effort on the control of speed in relatively low effort reaching movements has been underappreciated. Here we show that the implicit control of reaching speed is influenced by both the metabolic and accuracy requirements of the movement. We next propose a mathematical model that explains how accuracy, metabolic expenditure, and time costs, interact to determine the implicit choice of movement speed. Our results highlight that disease-related movement slowing can be modulated by factors beyond accuracy. Importantly, we show that movement costs such as metabolic cost have a strong influence, despite the relatively low cost of reaching. Economic variables such as time and subjective effort costs can also lead to movement slowing. Taken together, we present a unifying framework with which to interrogate the critical role accuracy, effort and time costs play in the implicit control of movement speed in health and disease.
biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology