Pregnancy outcomes following second‐trimester abortions: A comparison between medical and surgical management. A historic cohort study

Hanaa Abokaf,Elena Korytnikova,Shimrit Yaniv‐Salem,Ilana Shoham‐Vardi,Ruslan Sergienko,Boaz Sheizaf,Adi Y. Weintraub
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15958
2024-10-20
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Abstract:Objective To compare perinatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies following second‐trimester abortions, stratified by the method of abortion. Methods A historic cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary hospital, including women who had second‐trimester abortions between 12+0 and 24+0 weeks and subsequent documented pregnancies within 3–60 months. Data were collected from hospitalization and perinatal databases. Composite outcome variables were constructed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze associations, adjusting for confounders. Results Among 771 women meeting the inclusion criteria, 83% had surgical abortions and 17% had medical abortions. Medical abortion was associated with a higher incidence of placenta‐associated pregnancy complications compared with surgical abortion. No significant differences were found in other perinatal outcomes. Conclusion The study highlights the potential influence of the abortion method on subsequent pregnancy outcomes, particularly regarding placenta‐associated complications. This underscores the importance of considering the method of second‐trimester abortion in counseling women regarding potential risks to subsequent pregnancies. Adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies following second‐trimester abortion were associated with the medical method of abortion, warranting further research and careful counseling in clinical practice.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?