Identifying carers in general practice (STATUS QUO): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England

Sarah Lawton,Christian Mallen,Zarish Hussain,Ram Bajpai,Sara Muller,Cath Holmstrom,Clare Jinks,Toby Helliwell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083816

IF: 3.006

2024-04-17

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives To determine General Practice (GP) recording of carer status and the number of patients self-identifying as carers, while self-completing an automated check-in screen prior to a GP consultation. Design A descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting 11 GPs in the West Midlands, England. Recruitment commenced in September 2019 and concluded in January 2020. Participants All patients aged 10 years and over, self-completing an automated check-in screen, were invited to participate during a 3-week recruitment period. Primary and secondary outcome measures The current coding of carers at participating GPs and the number of patients identifying themselves as a carer were primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included the number of responses attained from automated check-in screens as a research data collection tool and whether carers felt supported in their carer role. Results 80.3% (n=9301) of patients self-completing an automated check-in screen participated in QUantifying the identification Of carers in general practice (STATUS QUO Study) (62.6% (n=5822) female, mean age 52.9 years (10–98 years, SD=20.3)). Prior to recruitment, the clinical code used to denote a carer was identified in 2.7% (n=2739) of medical records across the participating GPs. 10.1% (n=936) of participants identified themselves as a carer. They reported feeling supported with their own health and social care needs: always 19.3% (n=150), a lot of the time 13.2% (n=102), some of the time 40.8% (n=317) and never 26.7% (n=207). Conclusions Many more participants self-identified as a carer than were recorded on participating GP lists. Improvements in the recording of the population's caring status need to be actioned, to ensure that supportive implementation strategies for carers are effectively received. Using automated check-in facilities for research continues to provide high participation rates.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main objective of this paper is to determine the extent to which General Practitioners (GPs) in general practice in England record the identity of carers and the number of patients who self-identify as carers through automated check-in screens. The study employed a cross-sectional research design and was conducted in 11 GP practices in the West Midlands region of England.

Specifically, the aims of the study are:
1. To determine the current coding of carer identity in the participating GP practices.
2. To understand how many patients attending appointments self-identify as carers by collecting data through automated check-in screens.
3. To investigate whether these patients who self-identify as carers feel supported in their role as carers.

The study results indicate that more participants self-identified as carers, and this number was significantly higher than the number of carers recorded by GPs. This suggests a need to improve the recording of carer identities among the public to ensure that support strategies for carers can be effectively implemented. Additionally, the study found that using automated check-in facilities for research can consistently achieve high participation rates.