Comparison of Detection Methods of Microplastics in Landfill Mineralized Refuse and Selection of Degradation Degree Indexes
Ying Zhang,Yawen Peng,Chu Peng,Ping Wang,Yuan Lu,Xiaosong He,Lei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02772
2021-09-29
Abstract:A landfill is an important sink of plastic waste and potential sources of microplastics (MPs) when mineralized refuse is reused. However, limitations are still present in quantifying MPs in mineralized refuse and assessing their degradation degree. In this study, laser direct infrared spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were used to identify MPs of mineralized refuse from a landfill. Although 25–113 items/g MPs were detected in particles subjected to flotation, 37.9–674 μg/g polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and 0.0716–1.01 μg/g polycarbonate (PC) were detected in the residual solids by LC-MS/MS, indicating a great amount of plastic polymers still presented in the residue. This suggests that the commonly used flotation-counting method will lead to significant underestimation of MP pollution in mineralized refuse, which might be due to the aging and aggregation process caused by the long-term landfill process. The ratio of "bisphenol A/PC" and "plasticizer/MPs" was found to be positively correlated and negatively correlated with the landfill age, respectively. Therefore, in addition to the spectral index such as the carbonyl index, new indexes based on the concentrations of polymers, free monomers, and plasticizers were proposed to characterize the degradation degree of MPs in a landfill.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c02772.Text S1, detail procedure of mineralized refuse sample pretreatment; Text S2, methods of microbial diversity analysis; Table S1, information of mineralized refuse and leachate sample collection in target landfill; Tables S2–S4, instrument performance and MS/MS parameters; Table S5, flotation efficiency of fresh polymers spiked in mineralized refuse; Tables S6 and S7, potential concentration index for evaluating degradation degree of landfill MPs in mineralized refuse and leachate from different zones, respectively; Figure S1, layout of sampling points; Figure S2, abundance of suspected MP (A) and PET polymers (B) in mineralized refuse; Figure S3, size distribution (A) and morphology (B) of MPs in mineralized refuse obtained by digestion and salinity flotation; Figure S4, infrared spectra of main MPs in fibers and films; Figure S5, relationship between CI of PE in mineralized refuse of different zones and the corresponding landfill age; Figure S6, PCoA plots of bacterial community structure in four landfill zones; Figure S7, concentration of MP polymers and monomers in mineralized refuse and leachate; Figure S8, abundance of suspected MP (A) and PET polymers (B) in leachate; Figure S9, size distribution of suspected MPs in leachate; Figure S10, RDA analysis between environmental factors and MP characteristics (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental